Merged Newtown (Sandy Hook) Shooting Conspiracy Theories In 3..2..1....

Missing backpack?

Edited by jhunter1163: 
Edited by member's request.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
what are you a saying?

That bit of stream of conciousness you wrote doesn't mean anything.

I don't like guessing what Clayton's point is, but I think I've got this one.

Maybe the conspirators behind the fake shooting at Sandy Hook prepared by halting classes at the school for some number of years prior to the incident. Maybe they did so in such a way that the neighbors of the school somehow didn't notice there were no classes, or maybe all of the neighbors are co-conspirators.

But they forgot one thing! They forgot to have a website up for the school! Oh, my, what are the odds that they forgot to fake the easiest thing? Well, no matter, because Clayton has found them out.

There's absolutely no other explanation for the fact that the Wayback machine didn't archive the Sandy Hook website more than once over a three year period. None. Had to be that there was no website (at that address) and hence there were no classes because the perps were preparing to fake a mass shooting.

Honestly, it's all kinda obvious once you spell it out, Clayton. Not sure why you didn't do so.
 
"Some woman" on YouTube? Why is she a reliable source exactly?

Because she supports the conspiracy theory.

I have a feeling we are about to cycle around to the debunked "facebook page memorial creation date" crap.
 
I happened upon a youtube of some woman talking about Sandy Hook was unoccupied.

I pulled the following link up.


http://www.newtown.k12.ct.us/

I then used the wayback machine and what do you know 2008, 2009, 2010 were noticeably pretty much absent.

http://archive.org/web/web.php

The Internet Archive often doesn't archive small websites because they don't get many hits or links towards them. That was the case for the Sandy Hook school website up until the shooting. When the shooting happened, suddenly there was a massive influx of hits and links towards that website, which caused the Internet Archive crawlers to pay more attention to the previously unassuming and unknown website.
 
Last edited:
"This individual believes that Dr. Carver is part of a cover-up or conspiracy of some type," police said in the arrest warrant application.

I love the way they phrased that. You can just imagine the confused shrug that goes with it.
 
While the guy certainly seems to have harassed, I don't think the he was necessarily threatening. Unless the news article left something out, the only threatening thing he said was that the callee was "in trouble". He could have meant "I'm going to make trouble for you, trouble of a physical variety", he could just as likely have meant "I'm going to expose you as one of the conspirators".

From the article:

He told her he had "proof" that Carver did not perform autopsies on the Newtown victims and that he was covering up the incident.

What sort of evidence could one have that would show this?
 
*snip*

What sort of evidence could one have that would show this?

Dont even ask. Had a argument via YouTUbe with a Sandy Hook truther,his arguent was there was no evidence Carver was telling the truth. You cant argue with stupid.
 
What sort of evidence could one have that would show this?

My guess is that it would be some real or imagined inconsistency with the autopsy. Something like how the temperature of burning jet fuel proves the towers couldn't have collapsed. The autopsy describes some detail incorrectly, proving that it wasn't actually done.
 
My guess is that it would be some real or imagined inconsistency with the autopsy. Something like how the temperature of burning jet fuel proves the towers couldn't have collapsed. The autopsy describes some detail incorrectly, proving that it wasn't actually done.
Knowing the depths CT go to marginalize the human tragedy, I wouldn't be surprised if part of the theory involved supposed evidence of "corpse-cicles" planted to simulate a tragedy.
 
My guess is that it would be some real or imagined inconsistency with the autopsy. Something like how the temperature of burning jet fuel proves the towers couldn't have collapsed. The autopsy describes some detail incorrectly, proving that it wasn't actually done.

My guess (and it's only a guess) is that the evidence is the ME said the victim was shot with the rifle, and the rifle was (allegedly) still in the trunk of the car. Early reports misplaced the rifle and great CT hay was made of it.
 

Back
Top Bottom