Merged Telepathy test: which number did I write?

Status
Not open for further replies.
3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971 69399 37510 58209 74944 59230 78164 06286 20899 86280 34825 34211 70679 82148 08651 32823 06647 09384 46095 50582 23172 53594 08128 48111 74502 84102 70193 85211 05559 64462 29489 54930 38196 44288 10975 66593 34461 28475 64823 usw...

Fred
 
3.14159 26535 89793 23846 26433 83279 50288 41971 69399 37510 58209 74944 59230 78164 06286 20899 86280 34825 34211 70679 82148 08651 32823 06647 09384 46095 50582 23172 53594 08128 48111 74502 84102 70193 85211 05559 64462 29489 54930 38196 44288 10975 66593 34461 28475 64823 usw...

Fred

Ah someone beat me to it. That was exactly what I thinking! I also see dead people though.

Are you a psychic?
 
Michel, it was explained to you last time that a test like this is not going to be of any use in demonstrating telepathy. Nothing has changed, and you will get a load of funny answers and a few people making guesses.

Telepathy has not been demonstrated to exist under controlled conditions. Guessing games like these threads are not controlled conditions and you can not draw any useful conclusions from the results you get.

Some mental illnesses can cause people to think that other people can detect their thoughts, or that they can detect other people's thoughts, but in fact these feelings are symptoms of their illness. It is a good idea to talk to your doctor, and if you do have a mental illness, then take your doctor's advice on medication and any other treatment that is appropriate.
 
...... I wrote carefully one of the four numbers: "1", "2", "3", "4" on my sheet of paper, and I surrounded it with a circle. Then, I wrote it again twice.........
It was selected using this random number generator: http://www.random.org/integers/ . ....

You need a random number generator to pick a single digit number between nought and five?! Where's that laughing dog when you need him?

Ah, found him!

:dl:


Note: I do these tests because I believe I have a particular tendency to (telepathically) communicate my thoughts to others, and I am seeking to prove this through online telepathy experiments.

Oh dear. Well, whilst I have the little creature, we may as well give him another airing or two.......

:dl: :dl:

Tell me, is there any element of "blind" about this test? I mean, if 80% of us were to pick, say, 3, as the answer, how would we know that you wouldn't announce that this is the one you chose all along, even though you actually picked, say,1? How do we know that you haven't written all 4 answers down separately, and will just pick out whichever one happens to come top?

Is there anything about this exercise which isn't complete and utter bollocks?

Mike
 
Tell me, is there any element of "blind" about this test? I mean, if 80% of us were to pick, say, 3, as the answer, how would we know that you wouldn't announce that this is the one you chose all along, even though you actually picked, say,1? How do we know that you haven't written all 4 answers down separately, and will just pick out whichever one happens to come top?

Michel H said:
A MD5 hash code for a complicated sentence containing the number I ask you to telepathically guess (like, for example: "the number to guess is 5 f4315d 3b1fcd81") is:
e5ca98da86a6e4c582700847e587c3ac

This magic number, of course, provides total security against all forms of cheating and error :rolleyes:

MikeG said:
Is there anything about this exercise which isn't complete and utter bollocks?
Um, can I get back to you when the results are in?
 
Last edited:
Mike G when ridiculing somebody it's best to understand exactly that which you are ridiculing, otherwise it's possible to make oneself look even more ridiculous. Do you have the wit to understand even now. Here's a clue; e5ca98da86a6e4c582700847e587c3ac The OP explained clearly but you couldn't understand. He was right and you were wrong.

MikeG you might want to make a post with :o scattered around.
 
Mike G when ridiculing somebody it's best to understand exactly that which you are ridiculing, otherwise it's possible to make oneself look even more ridiculous. Do you have the wit to understand even now. Here's a clue; e5ca98da86a6e4c582700847e587c3ac The OP explained clearly but you couldn't understand. He was right and you were wrong.

MikeG you might want to make a post with :o scattered around.

I assume the highlighted sentence is a question. There is a standard way of indicating this.

And you are of course not only rude, but wrong. I ridiculed him for 2 things:

1/ using a random number generator to generate a single digit number, which is irrefutably what he did, but let me help you anyway:

I wrote carefully one of the four numbers: "1", "2", "3", "4" on my sheet of paper, and I surrounded it with a circle. .....
It was selected using this random number generator: http://www.random.org/integers/ . ........
So, your answer should be one of the four numbers: "1", "2", "3", "4", or "I don't know"

.......and 2/
for the ridiculous nature of his test, which has no element of "blindness" about it, nor anyway that anyone other than the poster can decide whether he was right or wrong. If I have got this wrong, then you will no doubt explain carefully how his test is correctly set up. And if you have got it wrong, then you will perhaps apologise, and scatter a few of these around.....:o

Mike
 
Last edited:
A slightly or densely wooded area, there's water somewhere nearby, and a city or town in the distance.

Wait....wait I know this one:

'You Are Standing In An Open Field West Of A White House, With A Boarded Front Door; There Is A Mail Box Here'
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom