• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Obama caught fibbing about NSA

Puppycow

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Messages
32,090
Location
Yokohama, Japan
From Aug. 9th, in a speech by Obama:

"If you look at the reports ... what you're not reading about is the government actually abusing these programs ... what you're hearing about is the prospect that these could be abused," Obama said.

Claim: the government is not actually abusing these programs, there's only the potential that they could be abused.

Now comes the story that makes him a liar:
NSA Surveillance Broke Privacy Rules Thousands Of Times Per Year: Report

WASHINGTON — The National Security Agency has broken privacy rules or overstepped its legal authority thousands of times each year since Congress granted the agency broad new powers in 2008, The Washington Post reported Thursday.

Most of the infractions involve unauthorized surveillance of Americans or foreign intelligence targets in the United States, both of which are restricted by law and executive order. They range from significant violations of law to typographical errors that resulted in unintended interception of U.S. emails and telephone calls, the Post said, citing an internal audit and other top-secret documents provided it earlier this summer from NSA leaker Edward Snowden, a former systems analyst with the agency.

In one of the documents, agency personnel are instructed to remove details and substitute more generic language in reports to the Justice Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

. . .

In another case, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which has authority over some NSA operations, did not learn about a new collection method until it had been in operation for many months. The court ruled it unconstitutional.

The NSA audit obtained by the Post dated May 2012, counted 2,776 incidents in the preceding 12 months of unauthorized collection, storage, access to or distribution of legally protected communications. Most were unintended. Many involved failures of due diligence or violations of standard operating procedure. The most serious incidents included a violation of a court order and unauthorized use of data about more than 3,000 Americans and green-card holders.
 
Obama couldn't have known that the NSA was perpetrating such shenanigans. He gave the best answer he could, based on the information he had, following his thorough investigation and review of NSA activity.

But since his authority over the NSA is limited at best, it was a foregone conclusion that his analysis would be incomplete. It's not his fault that the NSA did things he wasn't aware of.
 
The buck no longer stops here. Is Obama intentionally left out of the loop or does he just not care? I doubt he would make public speeches and statements about specific topics that he has no idea of what's going on. That's demanding naivete of the whole population.

I wonder who is going to be thrown under the bus on this one.
 
It seems the goalposts have already been moved. Here's Larry Ellison, owner of Oracle and of the 'one percent' who actually matter:
Turning to matters of online security and government surveillance programs Ellison endorses the NSA's surveillance programs as "great" and "essential."

He explained that for him, the agency -- which uses Oracle technology in their databases -- would be crossing a line should they choose to use surveillance in the name of political targeting.

"If the government used it to do political targeting, [that would be a red line crossed]. If the Democrats used it to go after Republicans. If the Republicans used it to go after Democrats. In other words, if it became -- if we stop looking for terrorists and we started looking for people with -- on the other side of the aisle," he explained.

Read: as long as it's not used to dirty the rich and powerful..
 
So what's new? He made millions of dollars writing a book that was full of lies.
 
There will always be abuses as long as agencies like the NSA are given power with no oversight, accountability, or transparency.
 
There will always be abuses as long as agencies like the NSA are given power with no oversight, accountability, or transparency.
Exactly.

And I don't think a secret court making secret decisions and secret case law is "oversight".
 

Back
Top Bottom