Looking for Skeptics

Status
Not open for further replies.
No one here asked you to explain the message. Simply recite it.


And no, you had multiple claims. Clear, complete sentences. Responsive to questions. Others heard the same things. And so on.

They were observations of how it is here. They do have clear sentences, and they do respond. These are not claims, just observations.

Message "We want to end trouble"
 
They were observations of how it is here. They do have clear sentences, and they do respond. These are not claims, just observations.

Message "We want to end trouble"

Can you send that message to Alderbank so he can upload it, please?
 
You lied when you omitted Caleprime's efforts to provide you yet another "silent" file.

Actually js, I'll say it again, I've not lied once. I heard calebs audio, I don't know what your hearing but I hear a very loud drone all the way through, almost burst my ear drums. It isn't quiet and it wasn't sent to my email address. I thanked caleb, not sure what else to tell you about that, but I don't see the lie.
 
There is no point in any uploads. I was informed they lose quality/sound/distort etc. I can promise you this, you will hear it all in the near future.

No one here said that.

How are you going to prevent that happening when you provide proof to the papers?
 
There is no point in any uploads. I was informed they lose quality/sound/distort etc. I can promise you this, you will hear it all in the near future.


That's another lie--you were informed of no such thing, at least not here on the forum. You still don't understand that a copy of a digital file, whether emailed, uploaded, downloaded, or whatever remains exactly the same unless manipulated in some way.
 
Last edited:
A. What "method" are you referring to?

B. Would you please answer the question I asked at the end of my post?

Method; being sent a copy of a silent-generated recording via email.

I don't know how to answer your ending, I did say I am wondering how to put such a claim into words.
 
I give up, I quit, I'm outer here. I did not come online to be scoffed, ridiculed or called a liar. You will eat your words one day soon enough. Good night.
 
Method; being sent a copy of a silent-generated recording via email.

I don't know how to answer your ending, I did say I am wondering how to put such a claim into words.

So you haven't quite made up the message yet?

There's no spirits, there's no message. Bishops can't help you. Whatever story you invent won't be less crazy coming from a Bishop.

Forget the press. Actually, go to the press. Good luck. Journalists love their woo, but you have nothing. Nothing at all.
 
Prediction: No one, including scrappy, will accompany flaccon to visit the press and attest they hear what flaccon hears in the recordings and they see what flaccon sees in the blood stains.

The press has this bad habit of including names when they quote someone.
 
That's another lie--you were informed of no such thing, at least not here on the forum. You still don't understand that a copy of a digital file, whether emailed, uploaded, downloaded, or whatever remains exactly the same unless manipulated in some way.

Why is that a lie? and why would you think I create lies? Alderbank was surprised at hearing the recording here, and asked if that was the same recording I'd uploaded, and it was. He told me they do lose quality. I sent a file to a friend and listened via land line, they do distort.
 
Until you make a video of yourself asking the spirits questions and having them respond, and we can all hear it, your stories are lies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom