Looking for Skeptics

Status
Not open for further replies.
scrappy said:
The personal bits regarding her father and her disabilities where crossed out . This was suggested by a poster in a previous thread .
Click to expand...

Why are they crossed out in a letter addressed to whom it may concern? The whole text of the letter should be shown.
 
Last edited:
Daylightstar said:
Why are they crossed out in a letter addressed to whom it may concern?
Click to expand...

AFAIK it's to cover confidential information such as doctor's name, Tracey's address, her diagnoses of illness/disability and other things she may not want to publicise.
 
flaccon, what kind of doctor wrote this letter. Is he/she a regular GP or is he/she of the alternative persuasion?
 
tuxcat said:
AFAIK it's to cover confidential information such as doctor's name, Tracey's address, her diagnoses of illness/disability and other things she may not want to publicise.
Click to expand...

Sure, but I am referring to the body of the letter. This letter does not contain a diagnosis in the redactions.
 
It's probably not a fair tactic, but the text under the white out looks like it could be enhanced with some type of filtering. I'll give it a shot, though I have no experience with his sort of thing. I will not report back and mention anything sensitive specifically, but I hope it works.

ETA: The letters next to the doctors' names indicate proper science based medicine.


ETA2: False alarm. Sorry. I can make out a few more letters when I play with contrast and such, but nothing that helps.


------------------------------------------------

I can make out "Robin, Evidence, Wimbledon, no card tricks" under one of the white out strokes. ☻☺☻
 
Last edited:
desertgal said:
I don't know if it is a matter of concern, but her full name is clearly visible in the first picture.
Click to expand...

Hopefully, it will not concern flaccon. She's dropped plenty of clues here and on her website. Cross-matching them isn't that hard, and filling in some personal details happens fairly quickly. So, the information was already out there for anyone that cared to look, and for those that didn't care, having it now probably isn't all that interesting.
 
tuxcat said:
I'm not even sure what the upload of the letter achieved, other than finding out her name? Oh well at least it's up and we can see what her GP wrote. When is Tracey going to start designing a protocol to test the phenomena. I've MD5 hashed the "silence" recording that is alleged to have said "Robin." Can't hear any voices and as the screenshots show the MD5 Hash is still the same! The only changes that have happened are me selecting new window themes every day.

Tracey has said in the past that the files are edited whenever the spirits speak. My "silence" recording in which Robin was heard hasn't changed a bit.
Click to expand...


Now, I'm confused. I thought is was one of my files in which she and scrappy heard "Robin". Six seconds of dead silence at the 21 second mark then "Robin" at 38 seconds.

Was "Robin" heard on more than one recording?
 
jsfisher said:
Now, I'm confused. I thought is was one of my files in which she and scrappy heard "Robin". Six seconds of dead silence at the 21 second mark then "Robin" at 38 seconds.

Was "Robin" heard on more than one recording?
Click to expand...

I thought she was talking about Alderbank's latest recording. I didn't realise it was your one that she heard "robin" in.

ETA: Flaccon/Scrappy's prevarication and witterings have even confused me as to what sound is being referred to.
 
Last edited:
scrappy said:
Tracy was reluctant to upload it but posters requested it .
Click to expand...

Yes, we asked her for the letter and by cracky she provided it. It proves that Tracey is willing to play by the rules.

Scrappy, now that you've seen first hand what evidence looks like and what methods you might use to produce some, what say you get on that? You might start with some kind of evidence that spirits inhabit your laptop.
 
Daylightstar said:
flaccon, what kind of doctor wrote this letter. Is he/she a regular GP or is he/she of the alternative persuasion?
Click to expand...

It appears to be an OBGYN.

Daylightstar said:
Sure, but I am referring to the body of the letter. This letter does not contain a diagnosis in the redactions.
Click to expand...

I agree. No matter how you parse it, the redacted sentences cannot refer to a disability, it wouldn't make sense. Well... it would make sense if each of the paragraphs were related by a single disability, and I can only think of one type of disability which would factor in to each paragraph.
 
scrappy said:
Tracy was reluctant to upload it but posters requested it .
Click to expand...

Yes, because she said it was evidence supporting her claims. It isn't. The doctor appeared to have been simply repeating what she told him.

How does it support her claims? (Not that flaccon/scrappy will explain. They can't.)
 
All the files that are uploaded here: https://www.box.com/alderbank are explained by pareidolia. The latest one at the top "silence.wav" can only be a hallucination. That's the explanation. Scrappy, Flaccon, et al there's your explanation. It's not my fault you're so closed-minded to accept the most likely explanation that makes the least assumptions and brings in the least unknowns. Unless you have any more audiovisual that you can share with us that refutes pareidolia (i.e. clear voices) then there's nothing for us to look at.

Once someone is dead that's it. You are either decomposed by bacteria and eaten by worms or turned into plasma and superheated gases. Complete and utter destruction. You are either re-entered into the food chain as ions and minerals or sent up a chimney as searing hot gas.
 
tuxcat said:
...
Once someone is dead that's it. You are either decomposed by bacteria and eaten by worms or turned into plasma and superheated gases. Complete and utter destruction. You are either re-entered into the food chain as ions and minerals or sent up a chimney as searing hot gas.
Click to expand...

And even then, some people will stalk you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom