• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

New TWA Flight 800 film coming out

Anders I said NON intenet what ACTUAL REAL reading and research yhave you done OUTSIDE of the Internet?
 
No I said NON Internet did you actually go to a palce to get the primary source outside of your arm chair?
 
I do not know what you think that says anders but it seems to me to be saying that the passengers suffereed instnaenous injuries, now that would be fully conisistant with a plane crashing into the sea.
 
Dcdrac said:
No I said NON Internet did you actually go to a palce to get the primary source outside of your arm chair?
Click to expand...

Find me a paper copy of the paper then. I looked up the particular issue of the journal where the paper supposedly was published. The paper was missing from that issue! (Unless I missed it somehow.)

ETA: Oops, I was wrong. I found the paper listed here:

Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care: October 1999 - Volume 47 - Issue 4 -- http://journals.lww.com/jtrauma/toc/1999/10000
 
Last edited:
No you made the assertions you have to back it up the onus IS ON YOU to provide evidence for YOUR fantasy about this.
 
Last edited:
Dcdrac said:
No you ade the assertions you have to back it up the onus IS ON YOU to provide evidence for YOUR fantasy about this.
Click to expand...

Ok, here is an interesting observation:

"WHISTLEBLOWERS:

Hank Hughes, * Senior Accident Investigator, National Transportation Safety Board (laid out the matrix for the reconstruction of the entire aircraft and was chairman of the Airplane Interior Documentation Group that reconstructed TWA 800s interior).

Bob Young, * Senior Accident Investigator, TWA (top TWA investigator who oversaw TWA team members on virtually all the investigative groups associated with the crash and was himself a member of the Eyewitness Group).

Jim Speer, * Accident Investigator for Airline Pilots Association (sifted through much of the physical evidence in hangar and found first explosives residue on right wing part).

Rocky Miller, * Accident Investigator for Flight Attendants Union (worked in hangar with Hank Hughes and also worked on Splatter Group).

Dr. Charles Wetli, * Chief Medical Examiner, TWA 800, in charge of crash victim autopsies and identification.

Col. Dennis Shanahan, M.D., * Sr. Medical Forensics Medical Consultant, TWA 800 Investigation, correlated injuries to plane damage." -- http://leaksource.wordpress.com/201...oof-of-external-detonation-trailer-rough-cut/

So, either the victims were real, or even the medical expert whistleblowers are a part of the coverup.
 
Dcdrac said:
a list names proving what?
Click to expand...

Those are experts questioning the official TWA 800 story. Two of them are medical experts! That's interesting because they would surely have seen the TWA 800 victims firsthand unless they are a part of a coverup.
 
Have you persoanly verffied and confirmed they are experts this has been seen before in another thread 40 supposedlymedical experts that were not.

You can do it from your arm chair....
 
Dcdrac said:
Have you persoanly verffied and confirmed they are experts this has been seen before in another thread 40 supposedlymedical experts that were not.

You can do it from your arm chair....
Click to expand...

I have not. We can however assume that the source is correct, and that the medical experts are:

Dr. Charles Wetli, * Chief Medical Examiner, TWA 800, in charge of crash victim autopsies and identification.

Col. Dennis Shanahan, M.D., * Sr. Medical Forensics Medical Consultant, TWA 800 Investigation, correlated injuries to plane damage.

And then one wonders, why are MEDICAL experts having a problem with eyewitness reports, plane wreckage or radar data? Even if they were a part of the original official TWA 800 investigation, they weren't experts in any of those areas.

ETA: The source about the experts seems correct. The claim that they are whistleblowers may NOT be correct however. From another source:

"The other investigators, all of whom appear in the documentary include" -- http://press.epixhd.com/press-relea...ce-call-official-investigation-results-false/

To appear in a documentary doesn't automatically mean they are whistleblowers. In fact, they could be the opposite and be defending the official version.
 
Last edited:
This is obviously very suspicious:

"They drove in circles all night. Seebeck says he took a `` mental picture of every single person that was put on our deck. '' But when they recovered someone, `` I told the whole crew to go sit in the bow. ''" -- http://www.lohud.com/article/20130619/NEWS01/130619017/TWA-Flight-800-We-wanted-find-someone-

Above on the same page 8:

"The Adak, a Coast Guard cutter out of Sandy Hook, N.J., patrolling in the area, had seen the explosion and was steaming toward it. Meanwhile at Shinnecock Inlet, about 15 miles east of Moriches, Petty Officer Ken Seebeck and his crew were refueling their 28-foot utility boat."

So, a professional Coast Guard crew were told to sit in the bow every time an alleged body of a victim was recovered. Because the professional crew couldn't handle it? Yeah, right. :rolleyes: More like it to cover up faking of victims.
 
Anders Lindman said:
This is obviously very suspicious:

"They drove in circles all night. Seebeck says he took a `` mental picture of every single person that was put on our deck. '' But when they recovered someone, `` I told the whole crew to go sit in the bow. ''" -- http://www.lohud.com/article/20130619/NEWS01/130619017/TWA-Flight-800-We-wanted-find-someone-

Above on the same page 8:

"The Adak, a Coast Guard cutter out of Sandy Hook, N.J., patrolling in the area, had seen the explosion and was steaming toward it. Meanwhile at Shinnecock Inlet, about 15 miles east of Moriches, Petty Officer Ken Seebeck and his crew were refueling their 28-foot utility boat."

So, a professional Coast Guard crew were told to sit in the bow every time an alleged body of a victim was recovered. Because the professional crew couldn't handle it? Yeah, right. :rolleyes: More like it to cover up faking of victims.
Click to expand...

I am not saying that your source is acurrate, I know nothing about "lohud" as a source. However, there are other less nefarious reasons behind it as well. It could very well be out of respect for the dead. Out of respect, maybe everyone shouldn't be gawking and gazing at the individual who just lost their life while on the way to Paris. There's no reason to turn a body into a spectacle. I know it doesn't add to your conspiracy.
 
plague311 said:
I am not saying that your source is acurrate, I know nothing about "lohud" as a source. However, there are other less nefarious reasons behind it as well. It could very well be out of respect for the dead. Out of respect, maybe everyone shouldn't be gawking and gazing at the individual who just lost their life while on the way to Paris. There's no reason to turn a body into a spectacle. I know it doesn't add to your conspiracy.
Click to expand...

So it's standard procedure then, for a Coast Guard Petty Officer to order the crew to sit in the bow every time they recover a dead body from the water? Even from boat accidents? Or only for plane crashes, because those are 'special'? Sorry, I don't buy that explanation.
 
anders it is clear you know nothing about this incident and it is pretty much like the rest of your useless threads.
 
Imagine at a car accident scene, when ambulance personnel recover a dead body, and before they do so the police officers at the scene are ordered to go sit in their cars. How stupid would that be? Yet, that's what the Coast Guard crew did. Is that normal or standard behavior? Or do you think the Petty Officer got a little funny in the head because the incident was so overwhelming?
 
Anders Lindman said:
Imagine at a car accident scene, when ambulance personnel recover a dead body, and before they do so the police officers at the scene are ordered to go sit in their cars. How stupid would that be?
Click to expand...

Add police and emergency medical personal procedures to the ever growing list of things you know nothing about. It's coroners that recover dead bodies. It is a police officer's sole responsibility to secure the accident scene.
 
After reading this entire thread I'm left wondering one thing.

Why the hell are any of you arguing with Anders?

Every single one of you should know better. He's a self admitted troll and will continue posting nonsense forever if you keep engaging him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom