New TWA Flight 800 film coming out

[beachnut]

Sure, but I don't see how a connection with the 115 volt cable would produce static electricity of thousands of volts. If it was static electricity no such connection would even have been necessary.

When will you read all the reports on TWA 800. Why did you pick 115 volts? Any reason? I makes it clear, you never read for comprehension the complete accident report, or the additional appendixes and studies. Why not come prepared to class? You would be kicked out of class for not being prepared. Go home now and read up, don't come back to class until you have some knowledge and can make rational statements, comment, and questions. Good luck.

 

[ComfySlippers]

The subject is now attempting to elicit a response by making a clearly absurd statement.

No change there then.

 

[Axxman300]

Given that there were no victims in the 9/11 attacks, isn't my hypothesis of no victims in the TWA 800 incident far more likely than the extremely rare chance of the official spark hypothesis?

Passenger list is here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/twa800/list01.htm

I also need to point out that if there are no passengers, and thus nobody died on TWA 800 then there is nothing to get exited about. No death = no crime.

We didn't arrest anybody, there were no economic sanctions inflicted on suspect countries, and we didn't bomb anyone as a result.

So if nobody was on the plane then there is not a single reason to care.

This is why you fail at conspiracy.

You are not an armchair researcher, you are high-chair hack. You don't know what you are talking about in this case on any level.

 

[Anders Lindman]

No death = no crime.

That's curious, because the FBI said as a conclusion that there was no crime.

But isn't it illegal to blow up an airliner in mid air, even if it's empty of people?

 

[Sticky Fingers]

That's curious, because the FBI said as a conclusion that there was no crime.

But isn't it illegal to blow up an airliner in mid air, even if it's empty of people?

Anders - Where did they get the pilot who agreed to fly an empty plane with a bomb on it?

 

[Graham2001]

Over on the Skeptoid blog there is a long list of questions for Anders to answer.

A short selection follows, for the rest just use the link.

• Who fired the missile?
• What kind of missile was it?
• Who ordered the firing?
• Was it fired accidentally or on purpose?
• Was it fired from land, sea or air?
• If land, what facility? If sea, what ship? If air, what type of plane?
• The “official story” indicates that only one ship was close enough to shoot down Flight 800, the Coast Guard cutter Adak. However, this small ship carries no surface-to-air missiles. Did Adak shoot down Flight 800?
• If so, how was Adak modified to carry such a missile?

http://skeptoid.com/blog/2013/07/01/flight-800-just-asking-questions/

And this list does not even touch the medical issues which Anders has decided to handwave away.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Anders - Where did they get the pilot who agreed to fly an empty plane with a bomb on it?

Autopilot.

 

[plague311]

The crew that worked on the crash stated they saw bodies on the water. If there was no one on that plane then why were there bodies in the water? Also, as others have started, why? Fill this in for me:

Step 1) Blow up plane
Step 2) Plane crashes
Step 3) ????

9/11ctists at least have the war in Iraq. So that's kind of motivation, but in every crime you have to look at who benefited from the crime. In this case I don't see anyone benefiting. It just doesn't make sense

 

[Anders Lindman]

Over on the Skeptoid blog there is a long list of questions for Anders to answer.

A short selection follows, for the rest just use the link.



http://skeptoid.com/blog/2013/07/01/flight-800-just-asking-questions/

And this list does not even touch the medical issues which Anders has decided to handwave away.

The missile conspiracy theory is a straw man.

 

[Anders Lindman]

The crew that worked on the crash stated they saw bodies on the water. If there was no one on that plane then why were there bodies in the water?

They saw clothes. And the official report said that the clothes were ripped off the bodies in the accident. Yeah, right.

 

[ComfySlippers]

T...
But isn't it illegal to blow up an airliner in mid air, even if it's empty of people?

isn't it illegal to blow up an airliner in mid air

Ill check. lol. Fairly sure its not illegal. Can you expand on that?

Anders, go to hell.
You are a sad little boy who has issues.
I hope you grow some balls soon because, as it is, you are nothing more than a 4 year old spouting gibberish.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Ill check. lol. Fairly sure its not illegal. Can you expand on that?

Check out Maritime law and things like that. There may be loopholes and things like that.

 

[ComfySlippers]

Check out Maritime law and things like that. There may be loopholes and things like that.

Grow up

ETA: And things like that. You know. And stuff.

 

[Axxman300]

They saw clothes. And the official report said that the clothes were ripped off the bodies in the accident. Yeah, right.

[QUOTEDIVERS FIND 100 BODIES IN WRECK GETTING VICTIMS & FUSELAGE A RACE VS. TIME
[/QUOTE]

http://www.nydailynews.com/archives...k-victims-fuselage-race-time-article-1.733268

 

[Anders Lindman]

DIVERS FIND 100 BODIES IN WRECK GETTING VICTIMS & FUSELAGE A RACE VS. TIME

http://www.nydailynews.com/archives...k-victims-fuselage-race-time-article-1.733268

From the article: "Divers found up to 100 bodies trapped inside the shattered wreckage of TWA Flight 800 yesterday but were unable to free them."

The divers were unable to free the bodies? Does anyone really believe that stuff?

 

[beachnut]

From the article: "Divers found up to 100 bodies trapped inside the shattered wreckage of TWA Flight 800 yesterday but were unable to free them."

The divers were unable to free the bodies? Does anyone really believe that stuff?

Guess what? Add diving to your list of don't know anything, or care.

The remains, discovered 104 feet under the Atlantic Ocean
...
recovery of the bodies from the Paris-bound Boeing 747 that exploded off Long Island a week ago will require divers in special deep-sea gear, ...

http://www.nydailynews.com/archives...lage-race-time-article-1.733268#ixzz2XrCxSTYA

... The victims were entangled within the wreckage ...

http://www.nydailynews.com/archives...lage-race-time-article-1.733268#ixzz2XrAgGbjW

You could have read the article.

Wait. How deep were the dead people (see article)? 104 feet. What is your bottom time with air at 104 feet (learn diving)? What is bottom time? How many times have you dove to 100 feet? Did you read the reports yet?

I told you to study before making silly comments in class.

 

[plague311]

They saw clothes. And the official report said that the clothes were ripped off the bodies in the accident. Yeah, right.

No, they are quoted as saying they found bodies. One person on site write a book about it. It's very basic research

 

[Anders Lindman]

No, they are quoted as saying they found bodies. One person on site write a book about it. It's very basic research

Yes, but check this out:

"And there were bodies. In this debris field there were bodies, and parts of bodies, everywhere. Some still had their clothes on, but most had some or all of their clothes ripped off. Many were horribly burned or torn apart." -- http://www.jacksjoint.com/twa.htm

All clothes ripped off the bodies? I don't think so. And no blood on the clothes?

 

[Anders Lindman]

"special deep-sea gear"

Special diving gear? Yet they could dive down and see the bodies without such gear? How's that for inconsistency?

 

[Dcdrac]

anders do some real investigation the Kook sites are not vaild.

And again just beacause you are ignorant of how things are done does not mean they cannot be done.

if you got out of your arrmchair and bothered to actually look into things properly you would not be abel to support nor post the rubbish you do.