• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

What will the world be like in 10 years' time?

6) Mobile Phones, portable gaming consoles, and Tablets will merge with the likes of Google and Windows Glasses...
When I first saw this line, I thought you were talking about a single type of device replacing all of those devices, and I was going to argue that that will never happen. The devices still need to interact with humans, and the human factor will always call for a variety of physical arrangements of electronics even if the working guts all have the same basic abilities.

However, from electronics companies working toward a more unified, seamless electronics experience, I do expect one or all of the following to happen:
  1. Tablets a few inches larger than the largest ones available now, more like a big laptop screen; their optional detachable or slide-out keyboards with trackpads will be hinged so you can set them at an angle and treat the tablet & keyboard as a single unit you can set anywhere, like with current laptop computers. Or, another way to look at the same product is that they'll be touchscreen laptops on which the keyboard & trackpad part can be removed or folded/slid out of the way. The keyboard thing might be in the form of a "carrying case" you slide the tablet into.
  2. Bundle/package deals where you get not one device but a family of 2-4 devices that are all essentially the same thing but in different shapes & sizes for use in different settings; for example, a set might include a smartphone and a large tablet, or another set might include one of those or a regular laptop, plus a "medium" tablet like what we've got today, plus a phone or two, or another set might skip the phone and go with a tablet or two and a pair of glasses with tiny HUDs that takes user input vocally and from a 3" hand-held trackpad. Devices in such a set will all constantly "synchronize" to each other any chance they get, so any updates you make in one are reflected in the others, and one service contract will cover all uploads and downloads to/from all of the devices in the group (not separate services for separate devices), including that they can all use the same email address and the same phone number. Smartphones might not even be called phones anymore, but instead just be treated as a small size of tablet ("pocket tablet"?).
  3. Variable screen sizes; not as drastic as what we've seen in some sci-fi, which would require projecting holograms into empty air, but I can see somebody creating a flexible screen that rolls up like a scroll. Imagine a phone with a screen 4.5" long and 2"-3" wide, that you can pull out one side of to make it 4.5" wide and more like 8"-9" long, then collapse it back down when you're done. The technology's name will probably be "scrollscreen".
  4. Software companies will merge software development efforts for computers and portable devices, so one set of software will be able to run on either. To run on portable devices, it will have to not be as bloated with junk as computer software is, but, to functionally replace established computer software, it will need to be able to run productive "apps" equivalent to the word processors, databases, spreadsheets, and media editors running on computers in offices right now. This will streamline things for users, but the incentive for software developers will be that it means they no longer have to invest in developing two sets of software plus a third separate effort to try to get the two to interact in certain ways.

...resulting in most people using some form of enhanced reality through out their day.
- many people will wear augmented reality headsets which will have a catchy name by then
Being connected to data services all the time is one thing, but having it enhance reality is another that I don't see happening.

Storage costs will drop basically to zero, and most data will be stored in vast server farms and streamed wirelessly to devices.
Never. You wouldn't be able to use it anymore when there was any kind of service interruption for any reason, you'd lose access to it as soon as the host did anything to it, you wouldn't be able to edit and keep your own version of it for yourself, you'd still be paying for the service to access it (which doesn't go down with technological improvements like self-storage costs do), and the low storage costs you're talking about remove the only possible incentive to put up with the above.

Speaking of electricity, we are undoubtedly coming up on an energy crisis.
Not until the fossil fuels get closer to running out. Until then, any related crisis will simply be the side effects of the fact that we're avoiding the energy crisis by drilling for energy.

Hybrid and electric vehicles will be much more common than they are today, which will improve air and water quality in many urban areas.
Air quality I can understand if our fuels still have pollutants in them other than C02 and H2O, or if you're talking about accidentally burning oil & grease along with the fuel, but how do our engines affect water quality?

Most petrol (gas) stations will include battery swap/recharge stations as well as petrol/gas.
I gotta give that one at least 20 years if it ever happens at all. The next big change in our automotive infrastructure is more likely to involve switching to natural gas first. For electric cars, the best I can say is that this might be true in the biggest, densest population centers, which is the first/only place where those cars will really take off. But they just don't have the range to be useful elsewhere, and gas stations elsewhere will have no incentive to offer anything for vehicles that don't ever show up there.

However, if/when we do quit burning gasoline in our vehicles (more than 10 years from now), whatever else we do use instead, we'll probably still call the stores where we buy it/them "gas stations". :rolleyes:

2) More people will be using public transport as it is improved across the world.
And more of it will be monorails.

3) Near Earth Space flights will be common place for ordinary people as Space Tourism booms.
I think not. Moving things that kind of distance & speed can only get so much cheaper, and the idea has rather limited appeal that would probably get even more limited if it seemed more within reach.

- facebook will be like myspace is now (dead)
What exactly happened to MySpace, anyway?

- there will be private for profit enterprise operating on the moon in some capacity
No chance of that at all due to lack of anything there of value to get

Self-driving cars will be "street legal", but they'll still be less common than Lamborghinis.
So not even around 20000 worldwide, with sales hardly over 2000 per year (roughly Lamborghini's total sales in history and peak sales in its biggest few years)? I agree they'll be uncommon, but I find that rather exaggerated. Lamborghinis are very expensive and produced at a place that isn't suited for mass production, neither of which must be the case for cars that drive themselves. A classic example of a car with new technology being famous for not competing very well in the market, Chevrolet Volt, sold more in 2012 alone than Lamborghini has in its history.

I predict not only that computer-driven cars will sell better than that, but also that there will already be a political movement to ban any further production of human-driven ones. And we'll have much better terms for the two types than Demolition Man's confuzzling "auto-drive" and "self-drive".

ebooks will be more popular than paper books, which will largely be "print on demand" only.
I read recently that Amazon already does sell more e-books than p-books.

Labor unions will be on the rise.
What will cause this?

People will be embarrassed to admit they were once opposed to Obamacare.
There will also have been another major new health care law making changes as big or bigger, bringing us significantly closer to universal government-guaranteed health coverage.
 
So not even around 20000 worldwide, with sales hardly over 2000 per year (roughly Lamborghini's total sales in history and peak sales in its biggest few years)? I agree they'll be uncommon, but I find that rather exaggerated. Lamborghinis are very expensive and produced at a place that isn't suited for mass production, neither of which must be the case for cars that drive themselves. A classic example of a car with new technology being famous for not competing very well in the market, Chevrolet Volt, sold more in 2012 alone than Lamborghini has in its history.
We're talking about ten years out. I think even "street legal" is a bold prediction, but we'll see.

I predict not only that computer-driven cars will sell better than that, but also that there will already be a political movement to ban any further production of human-driven ones. And we'll have much better terms for the two types than Demolition Man's confuzzling "auto-drive" and "self-drive".
I guess there's a one-man political movement now, but I don't see production bans, ever. There may someday be roads which only allow self-driving cars, but I don't see that at the ten-year horizon either.

What will cause this?
People who realize that corporations are not benevolent daddies which will do right by their employees because it's a good business practice. It will percolate from the offshore factories to the shuttered factories they replaced.
 
arthwollipot said:
Most petrol (gas) stations will include battery swap/recharge stations as well as petrol/gas.
I gotta give that one at least 20 years if it ever happens at all.
Few days ago I was driving through Boston and saw an "electric car charging station". Basically a post with a plug and a credit card slot.
 
Would you happen to have a link to the 10-year-old thread? Or the thread where it's mentioned?
Sorry, but the person who told me about it didn't mention what forum it was on or when. It wasn't here.

Never. You wouldn't be able to use it anymore when there was any kind of service interruption for any reason, you'd lose access to it as soon as the host did anything to it, you wouldn't be able to edit and keep your own version of it for yourself, you'd still be paying for the service to access it (which doesn't go down with technological improvements like self-storage costs do), and the low storage costs you're talking about remove the only possible incentive to put up with the above.
I disagree. Cloud storage is becoming more and more common even today, even with the arguments you make. Certain services are already starting to move to the cloud exclusively.
 
Well the response from the people testing the system now seems to disagree.

I am not yet convinced that those folks are a representative sample of the entire U.S. car-driving population.

I agree that technology and companies will progress toward that goal (cars linked to a system that monitors or even controls cars), but I think that there are enough paranoid Luddites that advancements will be retarded to a noticeable extent.
 
I am not yet convinced that those folks are a representative sample of the entire U.S. car-driving population.

I agree that technology and companies will progress toward that goal (cars linked to a system that monitors or even controls cars), but I think that there are enough paranoid Luddites that advancements will be retarded to a noticeable extent.
The overall reaction will probably depend on the U.S. Department of Transportation decision, mentioned in the article, whether it should be mandatory or not. In this case I think it would be better if they left it up to the market. I don't believe the "paranoid Luddites" really represent a majority and as long as it's something they can opt out of, and proves it's usefulness to everyone else, we probably won't hear much more than some grumbling.

If it's decided to make it mandatory, then I think we'll hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth about Government spying and the paranoid will be able to spread their conspiracy theories like wildfire. It could then sour the idea with enough people that the Government will back down and put it on hold.
 
Sorry, but the person who told me about it didn't mention what forum it was on or when. It wasn't here.

I disagree. Cloud storage is becoming more and more common even today, even with the arguments you make. Certain services are already starting to move to the cloud exclusively.

Adobe is one such company that has moved to the Cloud exclusively, but I think it's a horrendous idea.

The way their Creative Cloud service works is that you pay a $50 per month subscription fee for use of their software. This entitles you to instantaneous updates to the software, as opposed to waiting a year or so for updates, as has been the case in years past. All the files you have created using their software is stored wherever you want. HOWEVER, once you stop paying the $50 monthly subscription fee, you can no longer go back and edit or update the files UNTIL you restart the subscription.

As an example, I bought Adobe CS2 back in 2004 for $1,200 and used it on my PowerMac G5 until the G5 gave up the ghost back in October of last year. When I upgraded to an Intel-based Mac Pro, I bought Adobe CS6 on DVD for $1,600. Had the subscription program been in effect in 2004, that $1,200 software would've cost me $5,100 in subscription fees. Granted, I would've gotten updates, but I don't need updates. I need software that I've paid for and works when I want it to, not when Adobe says. And face it, Adobe can say what they want about the benefits of offering instant updates, but the truth is this is a cost-cutting move, nothing more. They no longer have to hire designers to design the product box, advertisers to advertise the product, a manufacturer to manufacture the product and shippers to ship the product. I've been in discussions with other professional designers in person and on LinkedIn, and the general consensus is that this is an idea that will backfire on Adobe. Not only do people want to have a physical backup of the software, but in the case of people who don't have access to high-speed internet (yes, they exist), need the physical backup discs in case a hard drive fails. And already companies, Corel specifically, have said that they will never go to a subscription-only business model and are advertising the compatibility between Corel and Adobe as a way of getting customers.

Truth be told, I think in some instances, the Cloud is a terrific idea. I like having my iTunes purchases on the Cloud, but that's just a one-time purchase. I don't have to pay again and again to watch or listen to media I've already paid for once. It's one thing to offer a choice of either the physical media or the Cloud. Cloud-only is no choice, and Adobe is not too big to fail.

Michael

ETA: In 10 years time, I want to upgrade to the Frinkiac 7!
 
Last edited:
The global thermonuclear war of 2021 initiated by a Chinese state backed terrorist nuclear attack on South Korea all but extinguished life on Earth. If you are reading this you are no doubt a descendant of the few wealthy or paranoid enough to buy a safe shelter...

In 2023 the world will be even more ********** as it is now.
 
Teenagers will again rebel against their parents by becoming conservative, joining the Tea Party and going to church. :o
 
So we're five years into this ten-year thread, and it's interesting to note which predictions are already starting to come true.

I believe that the internet will be so pervasive and continuous that we won't even refer to it as an internet any more. It'll just be data - the way we get around and do things will be so dependent on it that we won't think about it any more than we do electricity. Storage costs will drop basically to zero, and most data will be stored in vast server farms and streamed wirelessly to devices.
This is more or less true, and becoming more true all the time. Back in the 90s, there was a lot of talk about the "thin client" - an endpoint that sources all of its data and applications from the internet. We're pretty much there now - I am typing this on what is effectively a thin client, with a virtualised installation of Google Chrome. The other day I went to my local supermarket and bought a 32Gb USB key for $20.

Speaking of electricity, we are undoubtedly coming up on an energy crisis. Sustainable energy sources will replace a proportion of current sources as countries adjust their energy infrastructure. There will be more smaller, local energy generation units - many buildings will have their own solar and wind generation plants, with the excess feeding into the grid. Such plants will be considerably more efficient than they are now.
The first part of this is coming true. More and more countries are investing in sustainable energy. The second part, not so much. The sustainable energy sources are still centralised to a large degree.

Hybrid and electric vehicles will be much more common than they are today, which will improve air and water quality in many urban areas. Most petrol (gas) stations will include battery swap/recharge stations as well as petrol/gas.
Yep, hybrid and electric vehicles are indeed a lot more common, but the improvement in air quality has not been entirely due to this trend, but to stricter pollution controls in existing vehicles. We don't see battery swap stations in this country.

There will still be conflict in the Middle East and in Africa. Technology uptake in these areas will still lag behind developed countries. However, the situation will improve somewhat as more and more people get reliable access to the global information network. However, there will still be millions of people living in poverty.
Yep. Pretty much straight down the line here.

Movies will be shorter, skirts will be longer.
And this one I think I got completely backwards.

Thoughts?
 
Didn't take 10 years and it certainly wasn't a woman, but SOMETHING sure did float to the top of the punchbowl.

I also think "electable" and "politician" is pushing it. It was arguably elected but a politician it is not...
 
The global thermonuclear war of 2021 initiated by a Chinese state backed terrorist nuclear attack on South Korea all but extinguished life on Earth. If you are reading this you are no doubt a descendant of the few wealthy or paranoid enough to buy a safe shelter...

Might not happen afterall..

In 2023 the world will be even more ********** as it is now.

This one is right on track.
 
Microsoft will develop a powerful program that will make air transit flawless.



Hey! You appear to be plummeting to your death. Would you like me help you write a poignant farewell to your loved ones?

  • Yes: Help me say goodbye forever to those I love and who depend on me.
  • No: I will type the fleeting thoughts of my last terrified moments myself.
 
Sorry, but the person who told me about it didn't mention what forum it was on or when. It wasn't here.

I disagree. Cloud storage is becoming more and more common even today, even with the arguments you make. Certain services are already starting to move to the cloud exclusively.

Cloud storage I get, although I'm sticking to my local storage for now at least. What I don't get is the Apple storage that (according to my nephew, I don't do Apple) is local and the hardware purchased by the consumer but bounces all the data via Apple servers so it's useless if you lose internet access (plus security and privacy concerns, and it wouldn't surprise me if Apple charged for the 'service').
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom