"We reject outsiders coming to Florida — especially from outside what we refer to as the Bible Belt — and trying to remake us in their own image," said Michael Tubbs, state chairman of the Florida League of the South. "We do feel like it's a stick in the eye to the Christian people of Florida to have these outsiders come down here with their money and their leadership and promote their outside values here."
The problem is it's not a fairy tale," Hovind said. "We definitely have freedom of religion, not freedom from religion.
not if any text is Ebonicsatheist monuments are idiotic
What a worthless reporter. What does the text on the monument say? I care more about that than I do about what Hovind had to say, or who had their picture taken next to it. The drive-by toilet-seat-flinging was mildly interesting, but I don't think it's more important than the statement the monument itself makes.Some Christians took it hard.
http://news.yahoo.com/atheists-unveil-fla-monument-near-ten-commandments-195201537.html
I hope I get to see it before it is destroyed by bigots. A monument to free thinking is not idiotic.
The fun thing is this doesn't break the establishment clause, because it's not promoting any religion.![]()
Atheism≠Free Thinking
An "atheist" monument on governement property violates the Establsihment Clause from the same reason that a religious monument on government property violates the Establishment Clause: it gives the appearance of government support for a particular stance of religion. If atheists want equality, they should not be trying to insist that their beliefs about religion (which are not necessarily inherently atheist) deserve special treatment over any other beliefs about religion.
Atheism≠Free Thinking
An "atheist" monument on governement property violates the Establsihment Clause from the same reason that a religious monument on government property violates the Establishment Clause: it gives the appearance of government support for a particular stance of religion. If atheists want equality, they should not be trying to insist that their beliefs about religion (which are not necessarily inherently atheist) deserve special treatment over any other beliefs about religion.
An "atheist" monument on governement property violates the Establsihment Clause from the same reason that a religious monument on government property violates the Establishment Clause: it gives the appearance of government support for a particular stance of religion. If atheists want equality, they should not be trying to insist that their beliefs about religion (which are not necessarily inherently atheist) deserve special treatment over any other beliefs about religion.
"An atheist believes that a hospital should be built instead of a church. An atheist believes that deed must be done instead of prayer said. An atheist strives for involvement in life instead of escape into death. He wants disease conquered, poverty banished, war eliminated." - Madeline Murray O'Hare.
About the drivel I'd expect from her. Is she aware of how many hospitals have been built by churches?
This sort of crap is why I don't consider myself an atheist. I prefer non-theist. The difference between an atheist and a non-theist is simply the lack of hostility towards religion and the religious. As I've said in the past, atheism is the least tolerant religion of all.
A monument to nonexistence. How interesting.
So we have atheist monuments, atheist churches, a campaign for atheist chaplains...If atheism is to religion like baldness is to a hairstyle, some baldies out there must be buying mousse by the truckload.