McLibel Leaflet Co-Written By Undercover Plod

andyandy

anthropomorphic ape
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
8,377
Another pretty amazing story in today's Guardian (on a roll this week...):

An undercover police officer posing for years as an environmental activist co-wrote a libellous leaflet that was highly critical of McDonald's, and which led to the longest civil trial in English history, costing the fast-food chain millions of pounds in fees.

The true identity of one of the authors of the "McLibel leaflet" is Bob Lambert, a police officer who used the alias Bob Robinson in his five years infiltrating the London Greenpeace group, is revealed in a new book about undercover policing of protest, published next week.

McDonald's famously sued green campaigners over the roughly typed leaflet, in a landmark three-year high court case, that was widely believed to have been a public relations disaster for the corporation. Ultimately the company won a libel battle in which it spent millions on lawyers.

Lambert was deployed by the special demonstration squad (SDS) – a top-secret Metropolitan police unit that targeted political activists between 1968 until 2008, when it was disbanded. He co-wrote the defamatory six-page leaflet in 1986 – and his role in its production has been the subject of an internal Scotland Yard investigation for several months.

At no stage during the civil legal proceedings brought by McDonald's in the 1990s was it disclosed that a police infiltrator helped author the leaflet.

snip

Lambert, who rose through the ranks to become a spymaster in the SDS, is also under investigation for sexual relationships he had with four women while undercover, one of whom he fathered a child with before vanishing from their lives. The woman and her son only discovered that Lambert was a police spy last year.

The internal police inquiry is also investigating claims raised in parliament that Lambert ignited an incendiary device at a branch of Debenhams when infiltrating animal rights campaigners. The incident occurred in 1987 and the explosion inflicted £300,000 worth of damage to the branch in Harrow, north London. Lambert has previously strongly denied he planted the incendiary device in the Debenhams store.

snip

Paul Gravett, a London Greenpeace campaigner, said the spy was one of a small group of around five activists who drew up the leaflet over several months. Another close friend from the time recalls Lambert was really proud of the leaflet. "It was like his baby, he carried it around with him," the friend said.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jun/21/mclibel-leaflet-police-bob-lambert-mcdonalds

Surely in any functional democracy, the role of an undercover policeman in co-writing a leaflet for which the writers were being sued for libel would be disclosed?
 
On a more sinister note, picked up in the comment section:

Two campaigners, who were involved in the longest libel case in English legal history against the fast food chain McDonald's, have been awarded £10,000 by Scotland Yard.

Helen Steel, 34, and Dave Morris, 46, who became known as the McLibel Two, launched legal proceedings in September 1998, accusing the Metropolitan Police of disclosing confidential information to investigators working for the hamburger chain.

Scotland Yard agreed to the payout saying it regretted any distress that may have been caused to the pair by the alleged disclosure of their details.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/820786.stm

So, not only did the police undercover spy co-write the leaflet, Scotland Yard then tried to help ensure that 2 activists who handed out the leaflet were found guilty by illegally giving confidential information to MacDonalds....

Which makes you wonder if there was already a relationship between MacDonalds and the police which ensured that the company didn't ever go after the authors of the leaflet. This seemed strange at the time but would make sense if they had already been told by the police not to....
 
I was reading about this a couple of days ago, and was surprised that I wasn't shocked by the revelations. It is just the latest in a long list of police, spying and government outrages that no longer seems to outrage people because they now expect this kind of behaviour.

Totally agree about the Grauniad, they have been working really hard for the last year or two at exposing this kind of behaviour.
 
Seems surprising that no-one else has really picked up this story - I thought it was a pretty big deal - but it's sunk completely.....
 
Seems surprising that no-one else has really picked up this story - I thought it was a pretty big deal - but it's sunk completely.....


I think it may be because it is hard to know who to be mad with and who to side with.

Are people mad that the London police infiltrated Greenpeace? Or are they mad that a member of the London police force had a hand in libeling McDonalds?

There's not a lot of overlap between those that would sympathize with Greenpeace and those that would sympathize with McDonalds.
 
I think it may be because it is hard to know who to be mad with and who to side with.

Are people mad that the London police infiltrated Greenpeace? Or are they mad that a member of the London police force had a hand in libeling McDonalds?

There's not a lot of overlap between those that would sympathize with Greenpeace and those that would sympathize with McDonalds.

It's a part of the wild and wooly way undercover police have been operating. In the "police have sex with activists" thread I mentioned that the cop in this case has acted in the same manner as those who were tasked to derail the Stephen Lawrence campaign, smear his family, and those who were tasked to infiltrate anti police corruption groups. They were also deliberately targeting law abiding citizens to sexually seduce to build their covers. The McLibel cop had his activist girlfriend's house raided to bolster his own "hardcore" activist credentials.

Minor nitpick: London Greenpeace, the organisation that produced the McLibel pamphlet, is a different organisation than Greenpeace International.
 
Seems surprising that no-one else has really picked up this story - I thought it was a pretty big deal - but it's sunk completely.....
Maybe the police have some deep cover officers in the editorial staff of the major newspapers to handle just this kind of eventuality? Bribing other officers, illegally hacking people and so forth was just part of the cover.
 

Back
Top Bottom