But doesn't Google Glass try to identify everything it takes a picture of? So it's going to be identifying a picture of Google Glass taken by itself, looking at itself....That's not really recursion. That's Google Glass taking a picture of itself.
But doesn't Google Glass try to identify everything it takes a picture of?
But doesn't Google Glass try to identify everything it takes a picture of? So it's going to be identifying a picture of Google Glass taken by itself, looking at itself....
There is not going to be any recursion. The real Google Glasses are going to see a reflection of a pair of Google Glasses. The real glasses might even identify what they see.
and that would be it.
There is not going to be any recursion. The real Google Glasses are going to see a reflection of a pair of Google Glasses. The real glasses might even identify what they see.
and that would be it.
+1How disappointing. Crashing the Internet sounds like far more fun.
How disappointing. Crashing the Internet sounds like far more fun.
I've heard that it is near impossible to take a picture without someone realizing it with Glass. Is that true?I got to try the Google Glass, today. I must say I was moderately impressed with the floating display effect.
It was mentioned that part of the reason why the Glass is disliked might be because it is not symmetrical. We recognize non-symmetry in faces as something to be disturbed about. And, according to that theory, if they made them symmetrical in some way, they could come to be more accepted.
Then another person mentioned that the bigger reason is that no one ones to see someone wearing those in a restroom.
In it's current form, yes.I've heard that it is near impossible to take a picture without someone realizing it with Glass. Is that true?
Yeah, cameras hidden in glasses have existed for a long time. Though, you couldn't see the pictures you were taking while wearing them, before.Of course, I assume it would be much easier to secretive if you are capturing video before you go into the restroom.