Not so. Some of you Westerners. I know some and have met some who are serious minded and do not take drugs. A few have one mystic experience, but mostly they learn about the culture. Eighties, nineties, and later.
I didn't say the game wasn't taken seriously. As deep as reality. But even those who "do not take drugs" (and to my mind especially some of those, cosy in their own fantasy of mystical study) are playing a role game... the mystical "seekers after truth".... in fact, even the Indians are playing those games... some sincerely, some as corruptly as their politicians are playing their game...
"Learning about the culture"? India is corruption on all levels. The culture is inextricable from the caste system, which is one of the most deeply horribly corrupting systems of thought and cultural organisation ever devised by the devious mind of man! If westerners are over there deluding themselves they are finding "spiritual truth" in "the culture", they are more deluded than the junkies who are simply managing their habit without any illusions about what they are doing.
There are some who take it as a game, and some who like to believe and try to make it real, but only a few really know the meaning of some rituals, and derive value from them. I am halfway - I can observe, enjoy, or get some insight. The serious stuff can be great fun even for a non-believer.
After a couple of mild drug experiences, I avoided them because of their mind altering affects. If one is artistic they seem to help, but as an engineer, I could not afford to mess up my analytic capability.
I've no idea what this means. "I've had a couple of experiences of
music, but I didn't like it."
Do you see what I mean? The use of psychedelics, for instance, is a deeply serious matter, and demands more of a true devotion of oneself than adoring a guru, or meditating in a cave... and is far more likely to get real and deep results.
But it's a game nevertheless. I don't mean to belittle the game by calling it that. I'm just trying to get at the fact that people do not really know what they are doing, or really where they are, if they are not born into it (and even then, their understanding is unlikely to be complete... just deeper than the incomers). There's always an element of selectivity in comprehension, or in what you take from the culture you are entering from the outside.
In the case of the "drug culture", that's being generated by the participants, and as such is a vey real ongoing game in the process of being invented.
Some drug games are already terminally determined, such as the heroin cul de sac. Others like the charas game are deeply rooted in human history, but also malleable and responsive to new influences and players. The psychedelics game is an open-ended, infinitely extendable game of possibilities...
Hence the meaninglessness of your reference to "drugs".
As to messing up your analytic capability: Albert Hoffmann, the discoverer of LSD, lived to be over 100 years old, and retained his chemist's analytical brain in articulate, healthy condition right up to the end. Perhaps the propaganda surrounding psychedelics has been a distorting influence in people's grasp of what that's all about, do you think?
As with religion, the automatic respect accorded to "non drug" study of mysticism is unwarranted. And the automatic dismissal of drugs as being immoral or what have you is a hangover from Puritan religious influence in our own flawed culture.