New Disclosures on Benghazi

Status
Not open for further replies.
16.5 said:
False

The article was published today.
Click to expand...

Your article's headline: "Libya’s Ansar al Shariah, expelled after Ambassador Chris Stevens’ death, is back in Benghazi".

Which the article linked in spin0's post already covered.

Antpogo is absolutely desperate to shut this thread down. It will not happen! You have my word on that until the investigation is over.
Click to expand...

I'm still waiting on the "new disclosures" you promised, instead of constantly repeating old news.
 
ANTPogo said:
Your article's headline: "Libya’s Ansar al Shariah, expelled after Ambassador Chris Stevens’ death, is back in Benghazi".

Which the article linked in spin0's post already covered.



I'm still waiting on the "new disclosures" you promised, instead of constantly repeating old news.
Click to expand...

Thanks for posting!
Really helpful stuff.
One post from antpogo
Leaves us hoping for more.
Love it.

The article came out today, and hence we have antpogo's grossly irresponsible attempt to derail the thread. In fact, worse than that was the fact that the post to which ant pogo linked had nothing at all to do with the article I linked, nor the fact that ansar al sharia's headquarters were destroyed in response to their attack on the diplomatic facility.
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
No I'm building it on:

1. Ham asked Stevens if he wanted the troops
2 Stevens said no while...
3 begging the state department for additional security
4 which was not provided because
5 hills had a soft footprint policy in Libya as part of
6 obama's larger claims of success in Libya and against the war on terror
7 which lead to the bs talking points and subsequent nonsense story that he attack was spontaneous in response to a video.

QED

Damn, I'm good.
Click to expand...

At what?
 
16.5 said:
Thanks for posting!
Really helpful stuff.
One post from antpogo
Leaves us hoping for more.
Love it.

The article came out today, and hence we have antpogo's grossly irresponsible attempt to derail the thread. In fact, worse than that was the fact that the post to which ant pogo linked had nothing at all to do with the article I linked, nor the fact that ansar al sharia's headquarters were destroyed in response to their attack on the diplomatic facility.
Click to expand...

It's irrelevant when the particular ARTICLE that you cited was published. The TOPIC was covered long ago. Yes, it is possible for there to be more than one article about the same topic and it actually is possible for multiple articles about the same topic to be published on different days.
 
16.5 said:
The article came out today, and hence we have antpogo's grossly irresponsible attempt to derail the thread.
Click to expand...

This isn't the first news article on that subject. Ergo, you're simply playing rhetorical games in your attempt to support your original false accusations against Clinton and Obama.

And you're still failing completely.
 
jj said:
This isn't the first news article on that subject. Ergo, you're simply playing rhetorical games in your attempt to support your original false accusations against Clinton and Obama.

And you're still failing completely.
Click to expand...

Folks, if it isn't the first article jj doesn't want you to read it.

Protip, jj: It is now over TEN MONTHS and:

"none of the 70 men involved in the U.S. consulate attack has been charged. It reinforces their ideas about who’s in charge – and it’s not the nascent Libyan government."

Fanatical partisan is fanatical.

Thanks for posting jj!
 
Although the Obama Administration promised to be the most transparent administration in History, and although Kerry promised to assist in the ongoing investigation of the murders in Benghazi, they continue to stonewall, forcing the Congress of the United States to issue subpoenas to:

Eric Boswell, Former Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Diplomatic Security
Scott Bultrowicz, Former Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary and Director of the Diplomatic Security Service, Bureau of Diplomatic Security
Elizabeth Dibble, Former Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs
Elizabeth Jones, Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau Near Eastern Affairs

We remember Liz Jones, right? She's the one who told the Libyans it was Ansar al Sharia. For an update regarding that entity, see my post at 2379.
 
ANTPogo said:
No, we want you to stop pretending it's "new revelations".
Click to expand...

Thanks for posting!
Really helpful stuff.
One post from antpogo
Leaves us hoping for more.
Love it.

By the way, I said it was "Here is an interesting and informative article about the return of Ansar al Sharia to the streets of Benghazi."

So.... yeah.
 
Still waiting on your "new disclosures". Or, really, what the whole "scandal" about Benghazi is even supposed to be.
 
For the students of the ongoing investigation, I note a new analysis was published on the 23rd of June that i am sure many of you will find fascinating:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/22/trail-benghazi-security-lapses-leads-higher-at-state-department-records-show/

Recent congressional testimony has now drawn a direct link between the decision to keep the Benghazi post open and Clinton's expedited policy goals in eastern Libya. Before the House oversight committee on May 8, Stevens' deputy Greg Hicks relayed a conversation with his boss, stating for the first time that Clinton's personal goal was to establish a permanent presence in Benghazi. Despite the Dec. 27 memo referring to "budget constraints and the reduced footprint," the pressure was on to embrace a new transitional government.

Thanks, and looking forward to the fallacy of argument by old news, or something.

Anything but talking about the substance.
 
16.5 said:
Folks, if it isn't the first article jj doesn't want you to read it.
Click to expand...

Once again, 16.5 misrepresents someone's statement. Seems to be a continuing habit.

16.5 is the one who gave this thread the title "New Disclosures", yet he constantly whines when it is pointed out that he is not bringing up anything new[/b[. Why is that? It appears that even the person who started the thread doesn't know what it is about. And we are on page 60!
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
Although the Obama Administration promised to be the most transparent administration in History, and although Kerry promised to assist in the ongoing investigation of the murders in Benghazi, they continue to stonewall, forcing the Congress of the United States to issue subpoenas to:

Eric Boswell, Former Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Diplomatic Security
Scott Bultrowicz, Former Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary and Director of the Diplomatic Security Service, Bureau of Diplomatic Security
Elizabeth Dibble, Former Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs
Elizabeth Jones, Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau Near Eastern Affairs

We remember Liz Jones, right? She's the one who told the Libyans it was Ansar al Sharia. For an update regarding that entity, see my post at 2379.
Click to expand...

TellyKNeasuss said:
Once again, 16.5 misrepresents someone's statement. Seems to be a continuing habit.

16.5 is the one who gave this thread the title "New Disclosures", yet he constantly whines when it is pointed out that he is not bringing up anything new[/b[. Why is that? It appears that even the person who started the thread doesn't know what it is about. And we are on page 60!
Click to expand...


:rolleyes:
 
ANTPogo said:
How, exactly, is that a "new disclosure on Benghazi"?
Click to expand...

ANTPogo does not feel that brand spanking new developments regarding the on-going Congressional Investigations that are directly related to and follow up the testimony referenced in the very first post in this thread are relevant to this thread.

I respectfully disagree, and I wrote the first post and started the thread.

The nifty thing is that you folks don't need to read or even post in this thread!

Curious though that my posts are usually met with three or four responses whining about it, but never, ever addressing the substance.

Whine moar.
 
16.5 said:
ANTPogo does not feel that brand spanking new developments regarding the on-going Congressional Investigations that are directly related to and follow up the testimony referenced in the very first post in this thread are relevant to this thread.
Click to expand...

Yes, I know that Issa's dog-and-pony faux "investigations" represent the sole object of importance for the right when it comes to Benghazi. That's kind of been my whole point all along.

However, developments regarding Issa's partisan clownshow do not, actually, count as "new disclosures on Benghazi".

I respectfully disagree, and I wrote the first post and started the thread.
Click to expand...

I don't care. Especially not after you "respectfully disagree" here, and then end your post with the juvenile 4chan-ism "whine moar".

Curious though that my posts are usually met with three or four responses whining about it, but never, ever addressing the substance.
Click to expand...

Maybe if you actually post something with substance, we might.
 
ANTPogo said:
Yes, I know that Issa's dog-and-pony faux "investigations" represent the sole object of importance for the right when it comes to Benghazi. That's kind of been my whole point all along.

However, developments regarding Issa's partisan clownshow do not, actually, count as "new disclosures on Benghazi".

I don't care. Especially not after you "respectfully disagree" here, and then end your post with the juvenile 4chan-ism "whine moar".

Maybe if you actually post something with substance, we might.
Click to expand...

Issa's partisan clownshow .

That is how ANTPogo describes the ongoing investigation into the murder of four Americans.

Thanks for posting ANTPogo, I cannot imagine a more effective post.

Thanks.
 
16.5 said:
ANTPogo does not feel that brand spanking new developments regarding the on-going Congressional Investigations that are directly related to and follow up the testimony referenced in the very first post in this thread are relevant to this thread.
Click to expand...

What "brand spanking new developments" have come out of any recent investigations?

Curious though that my posts are usually met with three or four responses whining about it, but never, ever addressing the substance.

Whine moar.
Click to expand...

LOL!!! Every time anyone asks you a question about one of your posts, you avoid the question.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom