What's your theory about 9/11?

WTC Dust said:
In an age of terrorism, the WTC was a natural target. That creative people were imagining the possibility doesn't say much. Even non-creative people were imagining that the WTC could be attacked.

The key point is that these people did NOT imagine that the WTC would be turned into steel powder at low temperature with advanced weaponry. All they were imagining was a normal attack.
Click to expand...

Good thing it wasn't.
 
Hans Peper said:
Thank you carlitos, I checked the two, but there is no substance inside. Nothing about the twin towers in Full Metal Jacket.

regards Hans
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure that I have seen the Full Metal Jacket reference here before, but could not find it. Is it important to you that you have unique information regarding 9/11?
 
Hans Peper said:
That is the reason for me to come to this forum. I want to know, if other facts, you maybe know, make it harder. It is amazing, that the plan of the WTC attack is maybe older than 1987.
Click to expand...

It's possible that terrorists thought about some kind of attack on the World Trade Center as far back as 1987. After all, the first attempt was in 1993. It was then eight years before another attempt was made.

It seems less likely that Stanley Kubrick was in on it.
 
Hans Peper said:
Hi there

Some people say, that Stanley Kubrick placed his 2001 monolithe in the background of "Full Metal Jacket" scene, where cowboy is put to death.
There is in an object burning looking like the monolithe.

They are looking for a connection between 2001 Space Odyssey and Full Metal Jacket.

My profession is to find hidden messages in paintings, and just for fun, I had a look at the film, to find more about the message of Stanley Kubrick, thinking that a film is nothing else than a summit of paintings. So I found, that Kubrick used the same rules as the painters did.

So I found in the final scene of the film, what kind of burning monolithes Kubrick is talking about. It is the WTC !

We have to understand the connection to the 2001 movie as a hint to the year 2001. Its a hint to a date, where the monolithes will burn and "die"

If Kubrick was involved in the moon landing fake, it could be, that he wrote the screenplay of 9/11, because pictures are needed, which drill directly into the heart of man.

..
Click to expand...

From an excerpt to be published by Bentham …

This iconographical analysis is flawed. One clearly sees, at the end of Full Metal Jacket (1987) that the monoliths represent not the Twin Towers’ square cylinders but the flat slabs of life’s chance game of toppling Marxist Dominoes.

in5tyqunmq3at5qa.jpg


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmILOL55xP00.52 min.)

“There was The Domino Theory that suggested if one country fell to Communism they all would and it became the position of the United States to not allow the Communist to gain ground in South East Asia. “
http://themoviesnobs.wordpress.com/tag/the-domino-theory/

Kubrick’s continues his thematic expression of this artistic warring dominoes masquerade motif.
….. From Eyes Wide Shut (1999)
“The name “Domino” (the prostitute who is HIV-positive). A “domino” is a type of
masquerade costume that consists of a hooded cloak and half-mask, and was at its height of
popularity in the Europe of the late eighteenth century. In Traumnovelle, the characters on which Bill and Alice are based both wear dominoes to a ball, as recalled in the first chapter of the book. “
http://www.jeffreyscottbernstein.com/kubrick/images/Notes_on_EWS.pdf

images


Through repeated iconography, society then unconsciously absorbs the sweeping stream of time from the material selection of observation and examination and is , to some extent, shaped by a theory, or by a general historical conception. This is even more evident in the procedure itself, as every step made towards the system that ‘makes sense’ presupposes not only the preceding aesthetic experience but also the abandonment of the object of succeeding perceptions.
e.g.

Domino War Lady (2013)

http://audiocomicscompany.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/DominoLady_MP3_COVER_DrkFig-300x300.jpg


http://audiocomicscompany.com/?page_id=107

From the newly discovered remastered 2001, we come then full circle to the subjugated intent of the creator; not of burning Towers but that of Kubrick’s iconological interpretation of life’s warring masquerade game of prostituted toppling chance – Dominoes.

http://rookery.s3.amazonaws.com/895500/895663_8979_625x1000.jpg


http://www.worth1000.com/contests/13155/domino-theory

Edited by LashL: 
Edited hotlinked images to regular links. Please see Rule 5.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
aggle-rithm said:
It's possible that terrorists thought about some kind of attack on the World Trade Center as far back as 1987. After all, the first attempt was in 1993. It was then eight years before another attempt was made..
Click to expand...

Thanks, algorythm..

I have not thought about that fact. This has substance !

Hans
 
Good morning,

I hope you have enough popcorn stored.

In the scene, where cowboy was shot is not only the burning monolithe visible.

here is the link to that clip "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4r1I-J6g0M"

Kubrick made a 3 Sek sequence just in the middle of the "burning monolithe", where animal mother gave fire to an building with giant letters on the roof. He destroyes the letters one after the other, as if he is on a fairground.

So Kubrick gives us a hint, where the burning monolithe is placed. It is New York. We can read " My Town". He is born in NY.

And 7 seconds later we have the ideal position to read his message at 1:06min.
One of the rules, I talk about is :
"Objects placed in a vertical alighnmet belong together"
And this is : Fog, dead and burning tower(s).

..
Regards Hans (You like a drink to your popcorn ?)
 

Attachments

  • 0min57sek MY TOWN.jpg
    0min57sek MY TOWN.jpg
    43.5 KB · Views: 7
  • 0min59sek N Y.jpg
    0min59sek N Y.jpg
    43 KB · Views: 5
  • 1min06sek cowboy.jpg
    1min06sek cowboy.jpg
    32.1 KB · Views: 4
Last edited:
So there is no possibility that the Isle of Dogs features some rectangular structures that happened to be in the background? What is the secret meaning of allthe old british helicopters in the film?
 
Tomtomkent said:
... What is the secret meaning of allthe old british helicopters in the film?
Click to expand...

Don't be afraid, the Queen is not involved, that is sure.
The film is made in the Kingdom, Sire.
The helis could be rent for a few pounds.;)

Your sevant, Hans
 
Last edited:
So the Queen and Kubric are not both party.

How do you objectively tell the difference between intended images and coincidental likeness? Are all images of paired rectangles in all films part of the message? How do you know the helicopters are not a deliberate mistake meant as a message?
 
Last edited:
So the Queen and Kubric ARE both party?


Your methodology is to look at a film and note the imagry you think confirms your preconception. What do you think might be the flaw with that plan? How do you predict which images will and will not be significant?
 
Tomtomkent said:
....Your methodology is to look at a film and note the imagry you think confirms your preconception. What do you think might be the flaw with that plan? How do you predict which images will and will not be significant?
Click to expand...

Respect Sire, you found in seconds how my methodology works.
I need 17 years to find out.
:boxedin:
 
Hans Peper said:
Good morning,

I hope you have enough popcorn stored.

In the scene, where cowboy was shot is not only the burning monolithe visible.

here is the link to that clip "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4r1I-J6g0M"

Kubrick made a 3 Sek sequence just in the middle of the "burning monolithe", where animal mother gave fire to an building with giant letters on the roof. He destroyes the letters one after the other, as if he is on a fairground.

So Kubrick gives us a hint, where the burning monolithe is placed. It is New York. We can read " My Town". He is born in NY.

And 7 seconds later we have the ideal position to read his message at 1:06min.
One of the rules, I talk about is :
"Objects placed in a vertical alighnmet belong together"
And this is : Fog, dead and burning tower(s).

..
Regards Hans (You like a drink to your popcorn ?)
Click to expand...

MY TOAN is not my town. Oops. Can't see, or spell? And Y A is left, not NY. Oops.

You make up stuff as you go. The tower is a piece of concrete, not 1300 feet tall, not two towers. Your theory is nonsense, as you back in stupid claims. This is worse than the thermite lies and fake papers by Jones.

The WTC towers are not the same shape as 2001 monolith. Oops. You are mixing your nonsense into a delusional theory. Just say no.


http://www.rollingstone.com/culture...rview-stanley-kubrick-in-1987-20110307?page=3

oops
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom