• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

9/11 Truthcraft: Teaching 9/11 Truth to Kids

Hey everyone! This is something completely different that I've been working on. Check out some of these images. I'm creating a 9/11 Truth map of Ground Zero and the surrounding neighborhoods using a game called Minecraft.
A fantasy game based on idiotic claims?
A fantasy of steel foam based on lies. A failed delusion only one person believes.

A Game of Woo.

You are targeting kids with lies. That is not very nice.
 
A fantasy game based on idiotic claims?
A fantasy of steel foam based on lies. A failed delusion only one person believes.

A Game of Woo.

You are targeting kids with lies. That is not very nice.

It's child abuse. But is it as bad as telling kids they will burn in an everlasting fire if they have impure thoughts? That seems to be perfectly acceptable.
 
Dusty, there's really no nice way to say this but it's true and important for you to know. Being exposed to your work does not qualify as education. What you've done just isn't good enough to be called teaching. At a minimum you'd have to not tell people things you know not to be true to call it education. At this point your errors have been so thoroughly explained to you that to claim planes didn't hit the buildings is nothing short of lying.
 
I have so completely given up on this, I cn understand being uneducated to a point, after all I am just a layman. I can not interpret the events of the day with technical expertise like some, but I can listen and understand. I really do believe in my heart of hearts that her "ignorance" is nothing more than a simple 5 year old standing on a chair screaming "look at me, look at me!!!!!!" For me and I am sure most here will agree the act is getting old. However I do believe true to form, she will passover posts that could be extrememly helpful for her understanding, and in turn open up 3 or 4 more nonsensical threads to epic proof about her morbid failure at scientific study of 9/11.

I've always thought that Dusty's presentation shows some of the worst aspects of academic values. Notice how often she loudly proclaims that this or that bit is original with her? And how desperately she wants to pretend that she's giving a talk and we should just accept her basic claims (that this dust is WTC dust, and it contains lots of iron, and there's steel missing from the WTC, etc.) without question, at least until the period at the end of the talk?

This need to be original, to find a piece of this puzzle that she alone has studied and hence deserves credit for, just comes off as a bizarre bit of perverted academic standards to me.
 
I've always thought that Dusty's presentation shows some of the worst aspects of academic values. Notice how often she loudly proclaims that this or that bit is original with her? And how desperately she wants to pretend that she's giving a talk and we should just accept her basic claims (that this dust is WTC dust, and it contains lots of iron, and there's steel missing from the WTC, etc.) without question, at least until the period at the end of the talk?

This need to be original, to find a piece of this puzzle that she alone has studied and hence deserves credit for, just comes off as a bizarre bit of perverted academic standards to me.


Brontosaurus.

:D
 
Just one question dusty, did you build a model representation of the super hologram machine that projected the planes as well as the area 51 bunker which houses all the passengers that went missing?
 
My son plays minecraft, he's 13 years old. He made me a replica of Yankees Stadium that I thought was neat. We then TNT'd the hell out of that thing.

Attractiveness requires more than looks, it requires some form of intelligent conversation.

That's all I have to add.
 
Teaching rubbish presenting as fact is taking place in creation science classrooms in America.
 
Ah, so this is what "research scientists" do all day.

Minecraft, really? A game where you can chop trees down with a slab of ham?

Are you suggesting this is a less realistic simulation than teh stack of pizza boxes or flaming chickenwire models used by other truthers? How do you know the towers were NOT chopped down by ham-wielding creepers jooz?
 
Last edited:
Are you suggesting this is a less realistic simulation than teh stack of pizza boxes or flaming chickenwire models used by other truthers? How do you know the towers were NOT chopped down by ham-wielding jooz?

I was going to mention the pizza boxes. :boxedin:
They're my favorite Truther thing of all time.
 
If this is intended to have educational value shouldn't the buildings have accurate floor plans and a frame that represents the infrastructure?
 
OP's goal seems to be abusing the minds of children. What a noble objective!
 
Well, the rendition of the buildings as wire frames with a thin facade isn't exactly going to help you when it comes to spreading misinformation about where all the debris went to. Your purposes would be better served by modelling them as solid blocks, then you only have to explain where the office space came from that raised all that rental money.

Dave

You have a point here. I've just begun the build, so it's very incomplete. I've made some progress. Here are a few examples.

These images are early, mid and late construction of the ground level of WTC 4, 5, and 6. A couple of things are worth noting. A model is not the real thing. Minecraft, or any computer program, can only do so much, approach reality so closely. One of the limitations of Minecraft is that the blocks are one meter in each dimension. So things that are only a few meters high in reality are difficult to depict with Minecraft. Such as the ground floors of any of these buildings. So my compromise was to build something that evoked the nature of these small spaces without being an exact copy (because an exact copy is impossible to produce using Minecraft).

The reality with WTC 4,5 and 6, is that we will always have to resort to documentary evidence in order to learn about these buildings, because they do not exist any more.
 

Attachments

  • WTC 456 early construction.jpg
    WTC 456 early construction.jpg
    100.3 KB · Views: 5
  • WTC 456 mid construction.jpg
    WTC 456 mid construction.jpg
    97.7 KB · Views: 4
  • WTC 456 final.jpg
    WTC 456 final.jpg
    116.2 KB · Views: 4
You have a point here. I've just begun the build, so it's very incomplete. I've made some progress. Here are a few examples.

These images are early, mid and late construction of the ground level of WTC 4, 5, and 6. A couple of things are worth noting. A model is not the real thing. Minecraft, or any computer program, can only do so much, approach reality so closely. One of the limitations of Minecraft is that the blocks are one meter in each dimension. So things that are only a few meters high in reality are difficult to depict with Minecraft. Such as the ground floors of any of these buildings. So my compromise was to build something that evoked the nature of these small spaces without being an exact copy (because an exact copy is impossible to produce using Minecraft).

The reality with WTC 4,5 and 6, is that we will always have to resort to documentary evidence in order to learn about these buildings, because they do not exist any more.

Don't forget to include all the real humans dying, their grieving families, and the horrific acts of suicide by the pilots that initiated the whole tragedy. Don't want to leave that out for the kids, do you? :mad:
 
You have a point here. I've just begun the build, so it's very incomplete. I've made some progress. Here are a few examples.

These images are early, mid and late construction of the ground level of WTC 4, 5, and 6. A couple of things are worth noting. A model is not the real thing. Minecraft, or any computer program, can only do so much, approach reality so closely. One of the limitations of Minecraft is that the blocks are one meter in each dimension. So things that are only a few meters high in reality are difficult to depict with Minecraft. Such as the ground floors of any of these buildings. So my compromise was to build something that evoked the nature of these small spaces without being an exact copy (because an exact copy is impossible to produce using Minecraft).

The reality with WTC 4,5 and 6, is that we will always have to resort to documentary evidence in order to learn about these buildings, because they do not exist any more.

Minecraft?, can you make models of 19 nuts who killed for UBL's sick kill the USA people cause they helped Saudi Arabia during the Gulf War?

19 terrorists, what will you model idiots who did 911 with in your steel foam fantasy nonsense?

Teaching 911 truth to kids is easy. 911 truth is fantasy and lies. End of lesson. Your steel foam is insane nonsense.
 
Hey, that's exactly what I hope for too!!


I salute you for "deciding" to base your conclusions on evidence rather than irrational, unevidenced conjecture...

I plan to compare still images of before and after shots with the model.
 
Alright. A bit vague. I was looking for something more like a course outline. You're sort of presenting this as if it were a class, at least by the title. What specific examples of evidence are you going to display? You must have some type of plan.

Oh, absolutely. I'm going to show before and after images of all the buildings and compare them to the model.
 
If this is intended to have educational value shouldn't the buildings have accurate floor plans and a frame that represents the infrastructure?

A model of reality isn't reality. That much is obvious. But what might not be obvious is that no model can be a full representation of reality. Every model has to cut corners.

In this case, the game of Minecraft has certain limitations that constrain any model that might be made of Ground Zero. You can only place blocks that are one meter in size.

This is good enough to depict the general features of the WTC, including the steel framework of WTC 1 and 2.
 

Back
Top Bottom