Should we help Oklahoma rebuild?

I thought it wss the governmment aiming for Alex Jones but missing badly

Based on what Alex Jones says about the government, they're far more competent than God! If they can carry off these massive conspiracies, surely they can use their weather control technology to take out the guy who's onto them without fail.

God can be easily thwarted. . .even by iron chariots, for example.
 
I just have one question. Why don't the good citizens of the Midwest start building cylindrical dome-shaped buildings that are resistant to tornados? It only seems logical.
A question was asked, and an answer was provided below (with a heaping dose of assuming a question was a demand).

Who died and made you queen?
BTW, if you pay attention to the tornado in question, NOTHING is resistant to tornadoes with that much whoopass. For a smaller one, maybe.

Go check out the ariel photography again.

Where do you live, I wonder. I get the feeling that you know the square root of **** all about tornadoes.
I think not knowing the sqrt of mierda is implied when someone says that they "have a question". I can see where L.Y.S. might of missed the answer since it is awful hard to hear from all the way up on your high horse.

Daredelvis
 
I said more than TRAVIS could count, unless he is very fast.
So Oklahoma citizens, as private citizens, needed to be the sole source of restitution for Sandy victims in order for you to consider them eligible for aid from other individuals?
Hubris, thy name is "Liberal 'Skeptic'"

Well, you are right. That is way more than I could count.
I thought Travis' OP was tongue in cheek. I don't think Travis was sincerely proposing we withhold aid to disaster victims in OK. (I hope not anyway!)

He was also using equating a couple of Senators with the entire state. Again, I think it was just a rhetorical device, and I don't think Travis thinks that the entire population of OK opposed federal aid to states affected by Sandy.

If so, the OP makes a laughably flawed argument. Two wrongs don't make a right. The two Senators from OK aren't the equivalent of the entire state. And so on.

I had hoped my message was clear: Oklahoma had some windbag politicians who refused to help others but now need help themselves which they will get because the rest of us are better people than them.
 
A question was asked, and an answer was provided below (with a heaping dose of assuming a question was a demand).

I think not knowing the sqrt of mierda is implied when someone says that they "have a question". I can see where L.Y.S. might of missed the answer since it is awful hard to hear from all the way up on your high horse.
Hah. There are now two of you JAQing off. Thanks for playing.

Geometry won't save you from tornado at EF5 if it touches down. Yesterday and today there were funnel clouds in Duval County, and near Falfurias. Why are the houses still standing? The funnel clouds didn't touch down. There were tornadoes in Victoria, Texas, today.

LOS ANGELES (LALATE) – A Victoria, Texas tornado 2013 today is prompting new concerns. A Victoria, Texas tornado was spotted moments ago Saturday May 25, 2013 near Larkspur and Narvarro, officials tell news. Damage assessment is pending. Minutes after noon PST today, reporter Jon Passantino indicate a tornado touching down in Victoria. He tweeted “Tornado spotted on the ground at 1:53 pm CT near Victoria, TX – NWS”.

Conditions for tornadoes occur every year here in Texas, south of I-10 and elsewhere.
Not so much of a problem unless it touches down.
Then it's a sonofabitch.
 
Last edited:
Hah. There are now two of you JAQing off. Thanks for playing.

Geometry won't save you from tornado at EF5 if it touches down. Yesterday and today there were funnel clouds in Duval County, and near Falfurias. Why are the houses still standing? The funnel clouds didn't touch down. There were tornadoes in Victoria, Texas, today.



Conditions for tornadoes occur every year here in Texas, south of I-10 and elsewhere.
Not so much of a problem unless it touches down.
Then it's a sonofabitch.

Way to miss the point. Be sure to give Big Jake a good rub down tonight. Go back and try to read for comprehension.

Thanks for playing.

Daredelvis
 
From that link:



Interesting. Both Texas and California are big (area AND population) while Oklahoma is somewhat small in size and population.

Well, they get more than their share of tornadoes, and they had some fires a few years back but the biggest problem is that massive sinkhole at Norman. Oh, wait, that's not a sinkhole..... It's the Sooner football program sucking for the past decade.

(Couldn't resist.)
 
Yes Federal Disaster Relief funds should absolutely be made available to the communities effected by the recent hurricanes.

I do hope this event forces some moments of reflection upon the Oklahomanians that voted for the Representatives that refused and/or were resistant to allocating funds for Sandy, but I don't think it's anything we should force.
 
One can hope that federal relief to Oklahoma won't be pork laden like the Sandy relief bill. Many politicians took advantage of the disaster to bloat the bill with spending for their own personal projects, based on the (correct) assumption that anyone daring to object would be castigated for heartlessness. I haven't seen any indication (yet) that disaster relief in Oklahoma has turned into a grab bag of goodies for Washington politicians and their cronies, but I won't be surprised when it does.
 
Putting aside the immediate need in OK for the moment, I think it is safe to say that billion+ disasters are inevitable and will come with increasing frequency. Thus, I'd like to see congress prepare FEMA with disaster relief mechanisms before the next big hit rather than dealing with them on an after-the-fact basis.
 
BTW, if you pay attention to the tornado in question, NOTHING is resistant to tornadoes with that much whoopass.


As pointed out already in the main thread that is not true. I'm not sure where that meme is coming from because it keeps popping up.

You can build shelters that can withstand much more than that actually. They are fairly expensive though, especially considering you can't really use them for anything else besides a shelter.
 
As pointed out already in the main thread that is not true. I'm not sure where that meme is coming from because it keeps popping up.

You can build shelters that can withstand much more than that actually. They are fairly expensive though, especially considering you can't really use them for anything else besides a shelter.
I pointed out elsewhere that you can use the earth-covered ones for bleacher supports for sports fields. And in Oklahoma you could used them for tourist attractions. :p
 
Has this been mentioned yet?

“So, we’ve kind of transferred the responsibility for storms and damage to the federal government, instead of to the state government.” he insisted. “We’ve created kind of a predicate, that you don’t have to be responsible for what goes on in your state.”

What on earth is wrong with these people? By his logic, why even have disaster relief handled at the state level? Why not require each town to pay for its own storm damage? Or each neighborhood? Does he understand what it means to live in a civilized society?
 
Remember that for such people the ideal "society" is to live alone on a big ranch that you guard with all your precious, precious guns. Oh and you breed with your daughters and leave the little boys out for the Others to eat as sacrifice.
 
Some parts of New Orleans are at substantial risk in the event of a hurricane, and are likely to incur substantial costs to protect them adequately. It is also likely that they will need to be rebuilt from time to time as well.

So I would say it's entirely reasonable to seriously consider whether it makes sense to have settled those parts in the first place, or whether to re-settle them at all. And while I might not agree with the conclusion, I don't think it's particularly low-level at all to conclude that no, we shouldn't re-settle those parts.


Everywhere's doomed eventually, so why bother rebuilding anything at all?

Eastern Seaboard - Hurricanes
Western Seaboard - Earthquakes
There's a supervolcano on the middle somewhere*


So, no rebuilding of any kind whatsoever because, ultimately, it's pointless.


Good plan!





(*Forgive me, my US geography is terrible)
 
Hah. There are now two of you JAQing off. Thanks for playing.

Geometry won't save you from tornado at EF5 if it touches down. Yesterday and today there were funnel clouds in Duval County, and near Falfurias. Why are the houses still standing? The funnel clouds didn't touch down. There were tornadoes in Victoria, Texas, today.



Conditions for tornadoes occur every year here in Texas, south of I-10 and elsewhere.
Not so much of a problem unless it touches down.
Then it's a sonofabitch.



The point is that someone asked a question and you responded with an agressive apporach and 'who died and made you queen?'

Looks pretty classless from here, sorry.
 
And the ones who didn't vote for the idiots? Do you go door-to-door and have people prove who they voted for before you decide whether to give them bottled water and blankets?

You get the government you deserve. We all suffer under idiots we didn't vote for. Did "heck of a Job, Brownie" Bush carry new Orleans?
 
I thought Travis' OP was tongue in cheek. I don't think Travis was sincerely proposing we withhold aid to disaster victims in OK. (I hope not anyway!)

He was also using equating a couple of Senators with the entire state. Again, I think it was just a rhetorical device, and I don't think Travis thinks that the entire population of OK opposed federal aid to states affected by Sandy.

If so, the OP makes a laughably flawed argument. Two wrongs don't make a right. The two Senators from OK aren't the equivalent of the entire state. And so on.

Its not like the elected representatives of the state were elected there or anything.
 

Back
Top Bottom