Clayton failed to quote this:
So he was a member of this criminal organisation, and neither a civilian employee (as the occupation as "cook" otherwise might suggest) nor a member of the regular armed forces, the Wehrmacht.
And he admits to having supported the operations of the Waffen SS at Auschwitz, where, as we all know, a good million people were murdered in a systematic and planned fashion by Mr Lipschis' criminal organisation.
Clayton also failed to quote this part:
So it appears that Mr Lipschis, while perhaps not directly involved in the killing operations (he did not push any victims in the gas chambers nor did he throw the gas pills into the chabers), may considered
an accessory to the murder of many at Auschwitz, by supporting the actual murderers with daily meals. But I caution that we don't know the actual content of the indictment against Mr Lipschis yet, as...
Now I wonder how Clayton found any "scum" from the Simon Wiesenthal Center to have been "lying" in this case. Here is a summary of all the statements attributed to the Simon Wiesenthal Center in the cited article:
So I wonder which of these statements is a lie, in Clayton's opinion?
Clayton, do claim that the Simon Wiesenthal Center did NOT name him as number four on its list of most-wanted Nazis?
Or do you claim that he did NOT participate in the mass murder and persecution of innocent civilians, primarily Jews, at Auschwitz between October 1941 and 1945 (by cooking for the Waffen SS, who guarded the death camp)?
Or do you claim that the Simon Wiesenthal Center does NOT regard this as a positive step, or does NOT welcome the arrest?
I cannot find the lie!
The article links to this document from the Simon Wiesenthal Center:
http://www.wiesenthal.com/atf/cf/{5...c3e6dd277}/NAZI-WAR-CRIMINALS-REPORT_2013.PDF
It states about Mr. Lipschis - full quote:
Do you claim he did not serve in the SS – Totenkopf Sturmbann (Death’s Head Battalion) from October 1941 until 1945 at the Auschwitz – Birkenau death camp? It seems Lipschis already admitted that he did in fact serve with the Waffen-SS at Auschwitz.
Or do you claim that he did NOT participate in the mass murder and persecution of innocent civilians, primarily Jews? I guess that's what you deny, right?
I guess in this case, we should find where the difference in our understanding begins. To start off:
Do you deny that innocent civilians, primarily Jews, were mass-murdered and persecuted at Auschwitz-Birkenau?
Or do you deny that the Waffen-SS, which guarded the camp, bore partial responsibility for those mass-murders by guarding the killing operation?
or do you merely deny that a cook for this organisation has anything to do with what the organisation does?
If the latter, let me ask you: Do you think that membership in a criminal organisation can be itself a crime, even if you don't participate directly in murders?
That's a lot of questions, and I don't expect you this time to answer each of them seperately. A summary reply from which your answer to each can be deduced will do. Perhaps you could say that there is no actual lie from the Simon Wiesenthal Center in this article, that you just generally thing they are lying scum.
