RS never changed his story. The police asked him how he could be certain what Knox did while he was sleeping. He rather flip
answered that he could not be sure.
The trouble with accepting this as a "breaking of the alibi" takes a rather simple minded person to not see past the rather plain attempt to get something...anything to start applying pressure.
Knox herself said Raffe broke her alibi, and in recent interviews promoting her book no less. In her written declaration, she talks about Raffe breaking her alibi and how she couldn't understand why he would do it. clearly it was on her mind. raffe told them that Knox had told him to tell them a "pack of lies" and he had not thought about "all the inconsistencies" and that she had left to go somewhere, I forget the exact timeframe he gave the police but I believe he said b/t 10 to 1 am, Knox was not at his house. he may have modified his statement on Knox at the start of the Hellmann appeals trial to say he could not remember if she was there or not, but he did without a doubt break her alibi at the police station that night.
The point getting back to the false claim that the BF stopped backing her alibi is that it was a simple police trick added to the fact that the police illegally questioned the suspect without his attorney present. Had the required attorney been present during this trick question I am sure he would have reminded RS about Knox not having a key or that he was a light sleeper and would awake the moment Knox moved...see how that works when the laws are followed?
he knew he was going to be questioned by the police when he went to the station that night. Could he not have brought a lawyer with him? How is a trick question to confront him with his cell phone history and ask him a legit question about inconsistencies? He was real quick to break Knox's alibi, which is a big sign of guilt. if they were together that night at his home and he knew he wasn't involved a murder, why would he do this? there's only one answer and there is no doubt about it.
"She was not forced to write this declaration". I agree. The police wrote it. Knox was incapable of writing a declaration in a language she was just learning. Next illogical point please?
the police would be incapable of writing something so dumb and longwinded. Knox clearly wrote it, and she never denied writing it. I think that she probably wrote it English and they just had somebody translated it to Italian. You guys keep blaming the foreign language thing everytime you get into a logical corner and need a lifeline to get out.
I dont care if AK and RS did it. The corrupt lies and tricks pulled by police and prosecutor in this case are enough to make a finding of not guilty.
I know you don't care if they did it. if you did, even if the prosecuter and police were being mean to them, you'd care more about the fact they butchered this young woman.
Mignini had 18 family members arrested and charged and put thru a legal nightmare in the Narducci case....the judge was forced to write a 1000 plus page motivation report as to why he found them all innocent. And guess who wants to appeal? All based on the fact that a dead mans pants appeared to not fit him well.
Mignini charged 20 people but they were not all family members. Mignini has been given the green light to pursue the Narducci case again. Pointing out that a judge (Micheli, by the way, which is interesting) ruled one way on that case is ok but the case isn't dead yet, it's a process. the body swap thing is interesting, it appears the body in the coffin when it was exhumed was much different from the one put in in terms of hair on his head, waist size, and the fact the body was not bloated you would suspect since he was original found on a lake. this body also appears to have a broken neck consistent with strangulation, which supported Mignini's theory he was murdered. what is mingini supposed to conclude if the body in the coffin doesn't match the one that was placed in it a long time ago, if not a body swap? your problem is all you know about this case and Mignini comes straight from Doug Preston who has a beef with Mingini over the MOF case plus looking to use the Knox case publicity to get some publicity for his MOF book. Mignini never consulted Carilizzi, the psychic, about anything, he had actually sued her for defamation in the past, and they didn't like each other. Mignin never talked about Satantic rites in the Narducci case, it was about investigating the body of the doctor to see if he was murdered, nothing else. he didn't talk about satanic rites in the Knox case as well, and you can't provide one quote in which he does. if that was his motive theory you should be able to quote him talking about it.