My opinion only. The approach your posts take seem like you're claiming superiority. You say things as if fact, but rarely say why.
Can you comment on these things that are in the Massei Report, which are items which to me suggest innocence for the two students, but which Massei finds as factual even as his court convicted the pair.
1) no mixed blood of AK/MK at the crime scene
2) no motive for AK or RS to have been involved (Massei says that they were at the cottage by chance and got caught up in Rudy's motive)
3) there was no bad relationship between Knox and Kercher at all (meaning that Massei rejected the reason why Mignini put Filomena and the British friends on the stand)
4) there is no psychopathology found in the two students at all. (Buttresses lack of motive.)
5) there is not a single trace of Amanda Knox found in the murder room (Whereas if you'd seen the cartoon Mignini showed in court, there would have been a full forensic profile of Knox and Sollecito on their clothes and left in the murder room.
6) Massei only discusses a theoretical clean-up in the hall way, not in the murder room.
7) Massei concedes that there is nothing in science to rule out a single attacker. (Massei comes to the conclusion of multiple attackers on other grounds; but in principle, a single attacker is eminently possible.)
8) the climb in through Filomena's window is very possible, Massei rejects it on grounds other than its do-ability. But it is eminently possible, acc. to Massei.
9) There is no constant changing of stories from Amanda Knox. There are variations of minor details, but her own recounting of her alibi is consistent (acc. to Massei!)
10) Raffaele called the carabinieri before the postal police arrived
11) Rudy Guede had no contact at all with Raffaele before the murder and one or two brief encounters with Knox where basically they were in the same room.
It would be better to stick with items of fact rather than call people names. Can you comment on these things as facts as found by Judge Massei?
I found a summary of the Massei report at True Justice by that Peggy woman at PMF. (me and her are not exactly fond of each other so i'm setting aside my ego to post this) It seems to contradict your point 7 in which you argue that Massei thinks there could have just been a single attacker. Doesn't seem like he thought that at all and obviously if single attacker possible, that would make it easier to find the other two innocent. they didn't find them innocent b/c they thought there must have been 3 attackers.
here is what Massei thought and it isn't how you rpresent it:
Massei believes Meredith’s injuries lie at the heart of the debate over the single attacker versus the multiple attacker scenarios. The hypothesis of a single attacker requires that the single attacker continually modify their actions, first by exercising a strong restraining pressure on her, producing significant bruising, and then for some reason switching to life threatening actions with a knife, thereby changing the very nature of the attack from that of subjugation to that of intimidation with a deadly weapon, and finally to extreme violence by striking first from the right penetrating to a depth of 4cm (1.5 inches) and then from the left to a depth of 8cm (3 inches) into the neck.[371]
Massei describes the first knife blow coming from the right by saying that it was apparently halted from going any deeper by hitting the jawbone. The Court considered that this blow was an effort to force Meredith to submit to an action against her will. The Court also considered that the penetrating knife wound from the left was preceded by the action of running the knife over the surface of the skin on the same part of Meredith’s neck, just a few centimeters below the eventual strike zone where the serious, deeper second wound was inflicted.[371]
What surprised Massei about Meredith’s wounds was that in spite of all the changes in approach during the attack she somehow remained in the same vulnerable position, leaving the same part of her neck fully exposed to an attacker. If this were a solo attacker then this person released a firm restraining grip on Meredith to somehow bring a knife into play, then striking her first from the right and then switching the knife-holding hand to somehow float a knife in an intimidating manner across her neck on the left, before finally stabbing her in that same location on the left with a final debilitating blow.[371-372]
Massei concludes that throughout the attack Meredith remained virtually motionless, and he cites the almost nonexistence of defensive wounds on other parts of her body in comparison to the number, distribution, and diversity of impressive bruises and wounds to her face and neck. Massei finds this disproportion to be a significant factor, particularly when considering Meredith’s physical and personality characteristics.[370,371]
Meredith’s physical build was described as being slim and strong; possessing a physique that would have permitted her to move with agility. In addition, Meredith was described as being athletic and one who practised football, karate, and boxing.[369] Therefore, the court found it unlikely that only one person performed the attack against her, and inevitable that several people had acted together against Meredith; a group who forcibly restrained Meredith in movement so that she could not defend herself in any way nor shield herself with her hands in order to avoid the repeated attacks to her neck.[371]
Meredith’s defensive wounds were found to be minimal and consisted of a 0.6cm (quarter inch) long superficial slice on the palm of her right hand showing only a trace of blood and another 0.6cm (quarter inch) slice on the second finger of her left hand, along with several highly superficial cuts to the fingertip of the index finger. Massei finds this remarkable considering that the normal and instantaneous human reaction to that first violent knife stab to the neck would have been to protect the area of attack, along with a strong desire to escape even if it meant receiving a blow to another part of the body. However, Meredith remained in the same standing position while continuously offering her exposed neck to the actions of the person(s) striking her, with the peculiar distinction of striking first from the right and then from the left. Massei believes that a scenario as such seemed inexplicable, unless one accepts the presence of more than one attacker who, as a group, forcibly restrained the athletic Meredith’s movements while intimidating and striking her from multiple angles.[369]
Massei also believes that evidence demonstrated Meredith was still dressed and awake when the attack began on her and that the violence against her could not have taken place as it did if Meredith were lying on her bed. Massei concludes that Meredith was sober and fully conscious since no traces indicating either the use of drugs or the abuse of alcohol were found; all of which, if present, might have contributed an inability to firmly resist an attack.[369]
Furthermore, Massei finds it impossible to imagine a scenario in which a single person could have removed the clothes that Meredith was wearing (shoes, pants and underwear) while inflicting the sexual violence revealed by the vaginal swab. Massei finds it highly unlikely that one person could have caused all of the resulting bruises and wounds cited above in addition to removing her sweatshirt, pulling up her shirt, and bending her bra hooks by force before finally tearing and cutting the bra. The actions on the bra alone, during which a small piece of material with hooks was cut off and thrown to the floor, were necessarily conducted from behind Meredith and required the attention of both hands of an attacker, and thus Meredith would have had her own hands free to attempt actions of self-defense.[370]
Massei concludes there was very little evidence of any defensive maneuvers on the part of Meredith, which to him was a strong indication that several attackers were present, each with a distribution of tasks and roles: either holding Meredith and preventing her from any significant defensive reaction, or actually performing the violent actions. Massei concludes that the rest of the body of evidence came in full support of such a scenario, recalling that a biological trace of Rudy was found on one of the cuffs of Meredith’s sweatshirt indicating a gripping in order to prevent any reaction. In drawing together all of the elements mentioned above, both circumstantial and forensic, Massei concludes that the diverse morphology of the injuries, their number, and their distribution mandated that the violence against Meredith was performed by multiple attackers.[370-371]
