I've read several posts on this forum regarding WTC conspiracy theories, and I am led to believe that most of the posters on this forum are level-headed and rational, making good criticisms of the conspiracy theories. James Randi, who founded JREF, also has the reputation for rational investigation of claims. So, how is it that Randi's former assistant, William Rodríguez, is working completely the other way on the WTC conspiracy theories, doing his best to feed them? His claims about WTC are ridiculous, such as his claim that he could tell from his location in a WTC Tower basement that a bomb had detonated just moments before the aircraft struck the building above him.