Merged The Origin of Two Different Colors of WTC Dust

Yes it is Doc.

Now that I see it in context, and understand what and how ancient it is, I'm gobsmacked and even offended that you, yes you, pawned off that pic of bedrock as some new layering of dust.

For your part that was either genuinely lazy to not investigate what that image actually shows, or extremely disingenuous of you to present it as something other than what you knew it to be.

Stop trying to misrepresent reality to fit your unsupported theories.

I'm disappointed and rather offended by your actions.

:(:mad:

Tell me how bedrock got into the exhaust vent that used to service the printing presses in the basement of the old Saturday Evening Post building, located 200 feet away from Ground Zero at 75 West Street.
 
This is an evasion and downright disingenuous.

The entire Manhattan skyline shows clearly where the bedrock closest to the surface and is easiest to build tall upon. It's under ALL the skyscrapers.

Yeah. Manhattan Island is an island. The rock down there is part of the Earth's crust. But it's bedrock. Mmm hmm. They apparently discovered an ancient ship down there, too. It's hilarious.
 
Two Different Colors turns out to be > 21,000 different Colors.

What is up, why is the thread off by more than 20,000?

Do you think the following two types of WTC dust arose from different events?

attachment.php


The thread says two different colors of wtc dust. This clump of stuff has over 21,000 colors. Thread is debunk, refuted, and found to be silly nonsense. Now what?
 
Tell me how bedrock got into the exhaust vent that used to service the printing presses in the basement of the old Saturday Evening Post building, located 200 feet away from Ground Zero at 75 West Street.

A lie? You're saying that what I've done is a peer reviewed work? Or that I haven't made a decision to keep to the dunderhead strategy?

Yeah. Manhattan Island is an island. The rock down there is part of the Earth's crust. But it's bedrock. Mmm hmm. They apparently discovered an ancient ship down there, too. It's hilarious.

I really, really doubt it's bedrock. The notion makes me smile.


Yes Dr. Tracy Blevins, I believe you are either lazy or lying. The first is disappointing and the second... downright offensive to the thousands murdered that day.

Since you will neither back up your wild and unsupported claims nor STFU about them, I will bow out for now and leave you to embarrass yourself further.

Whether delusion or trolling... I find your work here offensive. Ta.

:mad:
 
What do you mean, IN the basement? There is no basement there. There's no building there at all.

And when I say there's no basement there, I mean there was never basement there. Those pictures are of NEW excavation, outside the original footprint of the towers and outside the "bathtub". The new 4 WTC is a 72 story building, it needed a bedrock foundation. The old one was a 9 story building that never went that deep.
 
Is there DNA in the light dust? Yes. Is there DNA in the dark dust? No.

Exactly as I would expect it to be. The light dust is the dust from the collapses, which would include all the skin cells from 20+ years of accumulation as well as concrete drywall insulation etc. You have kinda proved my point.

Your darker dust is probably just plain old NYC dust that has accumulated in the 12 years since the collapse.
 
Last edited:
You're right. The writers of the article couldn't figure out how bedrock could possibly exist in the basement of the WTC. I hope you catch my drift. The photo captions were pretty incredulous, so I give the journalist an A for noticing the wee-oo wee-oo factor in that story.:boggled:

That's bedrock.

What do you think the bloody towers were built on?

Jeez... and you wonder why nobody takes you seriously.
 
That's bedrock.

What do you think the bloody towers were built on?

Jeez... and you wonder why nobody takes you seriously.

It is on one of the most valuable pieces of real estate in human history. How dare they try to put something past a panhandler/publicity stunt/meteorologist/fired adjunct professor like Rainbeaux Barbie!

LOLZ!
 
I am correct about the sunken treasure, right? Didn't they say they found a ship while digging? It's hilarious, I tell you.
 
It is on one of the most valuable pieces of real estate in human history. How dare they try to put something past a panhandler/publicity stunt/meteorologist/fired adjunct professor like Rainbeaux Barbie!

LOLZ!

Your characterization of me really makes me laugh. Rainbeaux Barbie seems to have had a lot of careers. crying :D
 
Your characterization of me really makes me laugh. Rainbeaux Barbie seems to have had a lot of careers. crying :D

Yeah, you sure did! There are a couple more I have not mentioned, of course.

None of course dealing with her educational background (save the terminated position as an adjunct professor) and absolutely none dealing with anything remotely related to WTC.

Cool that "bedrock" makes you laugh. You seem sober today.
 
I am correct about the sunken treasure, right? Didn't they say they found a ship while digging? It's hilarious, I tell you.

Why is it hilarious? I guess you don't know how lower Manhattan has been expanded over the years. Parts of the WTC site used to be under the Hudson river.

http://www.racontrs.com/stories/nyc-land-reclamation/

ETA: Hilarious is that you didn't know this, didn't you say you used to live in Battery Park City?
 
Last edited:
I am correct about the sunken treasure, right? Didn't they say they found a ship while digging? It's hilarious, I tell you.

Why is this so funny and what does it have to do with your "dust?"
 
Yeah, you sure did! There are a couple more I have not mentioned, of course.

None of course dealing with her educational background (save the terminated position as an adjunct professor) and absolutely none dealing with anything remotely related to WTC.

Cool that "bedrock" makes you laugh. You seem sober today.

That was funny, too!
 

Back
Top Bottom