Merged The Origin of Two Different Colors of WTC Dust

WTC Dust said:
Yes, after my doctorate and post-doctorate, I went on to get a separate graduate degree in science education.
Click to expand...

So when you post something "as an authority" you are using yourself as that "authority", correct?
 
WTC Dust said:
You forgot about the microscopic images of iron fragments and the technique that other researchers are using to obtain these fragments. They isolate them with a magnet. This isn't my work. I haven't "isolated" any iron fragments from my samples. My microscope images are non-isolated samples.

I guess what I could do is develop some kind of calibrated magnetic purification scheme and show two samples, one of which has been separated with a magnet, but that's kind of messy. I might do it.
Click to expand...

It's still just random dust with nothing to establish that it even came from the WTC.

Don't you think this topic is serious enough to deserve your best efforts? You're very unconcerned about doing any work of quality. This topic really rates better than being turned into an unimportant hobby by you.
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
Yes, after my doctorate and post-doctorate, I went on to get a separate graduate degree in science education.
Click to expand...

Tracy:
You talk about your education quite extensively, but very little about your work history. I understand that since arriving in New York, you have had the following occupations/avocations:

*comptroller for New York's Medical Marijuana Party
*blogger
*panhandler
*performance artist/Rainbeuax Barbie
*OWS protester
*adjunct professor at Touro College
*cross-country driver for $2,000.
*employee of a financial services firm
* Promoter of ibogaine (a naturally occurring psychoactive substance with both psychedelic and dissociative properties)

Anything else you feel we should be aware of? As you are asserting that your educational background makes you an authority, I think it make sense to see whether your employment history does so as well.
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
What you are experiencing is a person in control. You all might want the world from me, but I'm only giving you what I want to give you. I'm testing ideas. "How do you detect DNA cheaply outside of a formal laboratory setting?" is not controversial or interesting science.
Click to expand...


OPEN QUESTION TO ALL...

I think I made it clear that I'm curious about this aspect. Can anyone expand on the bolded statement for me? Of course not mentioned is the ability to specify human DNA. That's important, I believe.
 
16.5 said:
Anything else you feel we should be aware of? As you are asserting that your educational background makes you an authority, I think it make sense to see whether your employment history does so as well.
Click to expand...

You don't need employment when you can get grants. ;)

I feel alittle quezy when I think I likely paid for this education with my tax dollars.
 
WTC Dust said:
What you are experiencing is a person in control.
Click to expand...

Control?...no, what we are "experiencing" is a person on the very edge of rationality...whose very existence seems to revolve around idiotic 911 claims...who apparently does not realize just how funny her posts are.

Be my guest and ask others if you don't believe me...it's not like anyone here is actually taking what you post, seriously, no, we're all just laughing.


Call it cheap entertainment. :D
 
R.A.F. said:
There is no "cheap", non-laboratory method for detecting/identifying DNA. Those saying differently are only displaying their ignorance.
Click to expand...

Thanks. Can you (or anyone) answer the question the Tracy wont?

How (mechanically, not chemically) does one field test for the presence of DNA, and can you differentiate human DNA specifically?

edit - Sorry, on re-reading, I'm not sure if you're saying it's difficult/expensive or that it can not be done.
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
Yes, after my doctorate and post-doctorate, I went on to get a separate graduate degree in science education.
Click to expand...

Why so did I. in fact I have three doctorates* and developed a cure for cancer, aids and the plague of psoriasis, all of which were suppressed by the Establishment.

*Rocky Knocks U.


Dr3 tsig.
 
DNA testing

WTC Dust said:
You haven't yet given me a motivation to reveal my technical specifications. Me posting to JREF is about me testing out some ideas. It has never been about satisfying people.

If there were a good reason that benefited my purpose, I'd reveal the specs. I have some very good reasons not to, not limited to the fact that I have decided to present the evidence in a certain way. If you want me to change my long term strategy, then you'll have to give me a reason that benefits my goals.

Otherwise, it's good enough to know that my PhD was in biomedical science and that I have been fully trained in DNA technology.
Click to expand...

One of the standards all DNA testing laboratories must meet is to ensure that the DNA recovered from an extraction is human rather than from another source such as bacteria. This is done through quantitation where the quality and quantity of DNA present in a sample is measured and assessed. Additionally, determining the amount of DNA in a sample is essential for success in the next step since most amplification systems require a narrow range of input DNA. This step is completed at the BCA through the use of a purchased Quantifiler DNA Human Quantification Kit and then running all samples on an instrument known as the ABI PRISM 7500 Sequence Detection System. This process takes approximately 30-60 minutes to set-up and then approximately two hours to run on the instrument.

https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/bca/bca-divisions/forensic-science/Pages/dna-procedures.aspx

Do you have access to one of these?
 
R.A.F. said:
There is no "cheap", non-laboratory method for detecting/identifying DNA. Those saying differently are only displaying their ignorance.
Click to expand...

I'm guessing her method was "black light" and she knows she'll be laughed out of the place if she admits it.
 
CORed said:
So you're suggesting that she shined a black light on her dust, and if it glowed, she assumed it contained human DNA, and not rat urine?
Click to expand...

From the way she seems to go about everything else, I would say that is a safe assumption.
 
CORed said:
So you're suggesting that she shined a black light on her dust, and if it glowed, she assumed it contained human DNA, and not rat urine?
Click to expand...

Half-jokingly, yes, that's what I'm suggesting. She can easily just tell us the method so we don't have to speculate.
 
Jim_MDP said:
...I'm not sure if you're saying it's difficult/expensive or that it can not be done.
Click to expand...

No, I'm not saying it is impossible, but consider this...

Which would be the easiest?...bringing some very expensive/sensitive equipment to each and ever crime scene to collect DNA, or taking the DNA sample to the equipment to be evaluated?

The answer is obvious...
 
R.A.F. said:
No, I'm not saying it is impossible, but consider this...

Which would be the easiest?...bringing some very expensive/sensitive equipment to each and ever crime scene to collect DNA, or taking the DNA sample to the equipment to be evaluated?

The answer is obvious...
Click to expand...

Right, so we're getting closer.

If it is possible... how would one MacGyver a DNA detection test in ones home or apartment?

And yes... I am going somewhere with all of this.
 
Dash80 said:
Why isn't the perimeter steel as dark as the core steel then?

The core had more than just steel. Gypsum enclosed the stairwells, elevator shafts and bathrooms. There were fixtures and tiles in the bathrooms, particularly ceramics.
Click to expand...

I did mention gypsum and ceramics.

Both types of dust are filled with iron fragments. The darker type is almost nothing but iron fragments. It's a difference.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom