Merged Boston Marathon CTs

Here is the latest "proof of foreknowledge" that was presented to me this morning. A link to a Facebook posting from the afternoon of 4/15, just a few hours after the bombings by an anonymous government insider.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?....182680788459476.46931.176094182451470&type=1

Since it is tiny and hard to read I will give you the short version.

This inside source predicts a single suspect in his late teens/early 20's will be named and the public will be told he is unstable. The authorities are going to find firearms, reloading powder and NRA materials in his home and use this as an excuse to propose legislation limiting the sale of ammunition and reloading supplies and new taxes.

The "raid" to catch the suspect is scheduled for Friday and of course the whole thing was staged.

I had to point out to the person who provided me the link that this inside source got every single detail wrong and on that basis I saw no reason to find this persons alleged inside knowledge compelling.

That was mentioned earlier in the thread, and caused much hilarity. Particularly the fact that it appears that Thursday is close enough to friday to count as Friday to hold a "raid" that of course never happened at all.

Great stuff.
 
"While we don't have confirmation..."

In other words we are making **** up.

Yes. This, in Clayton's earlier post, made me laugh out loud:

At Veterans Today we had our counter terror crew going over high resolution photos
Almost every word in that sentence is a lie. "Veterans" "counter terror crew" "high resolution photos" ...

Here's Gordon Duff admitting that at least 40% of what he writes on his website is "purposefully false." Because "if he didn't write false information, he wouldn't be alive." :sdl:



I had a quick look at what this site represents and it seems they are well into conspiracy theories and even holocaust denial. I think without some better "evidence" than they are posting I will believe what I can see with my own eyes from the wealth of evidence presented online. Thank you very much!

Fresh from this Monday!

Holocaust History Denial: A Clear and Present Danger

Kevin Barrett@veteranstoday said:
I used to believe in “the Holocaust.”

Not as a religion – I’ve never been to any of the museum-temples or made a pilgrimage to Auschwitz or pored over the sacred texts. And I never was stupid or crazy enough to accept the Holocaust as a valid excuse for the Zionist theft of Palestine. (If the Holocaust had anything to do with Israel, then Israel would have been established in Germany – not Palestine.)
In short, I believed in “the Holocaust” as history, because I assumed that 99% of Western academic historians can’t be wrong.

...

Shermer and Grobman admit that the keepers of the Auschwitz memorial suddenly decided, one day in 1989, to reduce the number of victims of that notorious camp from 4 million to “about one and one half million.” That is a lot of victims to vanish so suddenly.

Shermer and Grobman claim that the suddenly-missing 2 1/2 million Auschwitz victims somehow magically re-appeared on the Eastern Front, where they turned out to have been shot down by German firing squads. This maneuver preserves the seemingly magical “six million” figure. But it raises some obvious questions about the reliability of the death counts. First, isn’t the mathematics of “subtract-two-and-one-half-million here, add two-and-one-half-million there” just a bit too convenient? Second, what about the forensic evidence? How can the remains of 2 1/2 million human cadavers have suddenly moved from Auschwitz to the Eastern Front? And third – if the orthodox Holocaust historians were that wrong about Auschwitz prior to 1989, what else might they be wrong about?

...

At this point, my faith in Holocaust orthodoxy was somewhat shaken.

...

These experiences have led me to conclude that the problem isn’t Holocaust denial – it’s Holocaust history denial (HHD). People like Deborah Lipstadt, and the other keepers of Holocaust orthodoxy, irrationally deny that the Holocaust is history, and therefore open to free and fearless rational-empirical debate. For them, the Holocaust is emotion-saturated sacred myth, not history.

...

I propose that America’s top fraud investigators should be immediately assigned to the Holocaust survivors’ fraud beat. The recent discover of $42 million in phony “survivor” claims is undoubtedly only the tip of the iceberg; billions more are there for the taking. The money recovered from the “no business like Shoah business” shysters should be applied to the endowment of Holocaust Revisionism chairs in a dozen or so of our leading universities. There, the world’s top Holocaust revisionists should be turned loose to develop their very best historical arguments. A lively scholarly historical debate between the revisionists and the defenders of orthodoxy would ensue.
 

Sorry i missed this post until I seen it quoted in Carlitos post above this one.

From the wiki page about Veterans Today:-

Two columnists for the National Post have criticized Veterans Today for publishing an article which they claimed "verges into Holocaust denial." The article, written by VT columnist J. Bruce Campbell in May 2011, states that:

“The holy gas chamber is a fake. Which makes the entire Holocaust story a fake. You can study it for a day or for a lifetime and your conclusion will be the same. There was never a plan for exterminating Jews and there was never an instrument. As Professor Robert Faurisson has asked for years, ‘Show me a gas chamber. Draw for me a gas chamber.’ It can’t be done because there was never such a thing.” The author also writes that “the main purpose of keeping alive the Holocaust is to protect Jewish banking practices
 
Sorry i missed this post until I seen it quoted in Carlitos post above this one.

From the wiki page about Veterans Today:-

AFAIC, VT is a neo-Nazi website. Which tells you everything you need to know about those JREF members who reference it.
 
One more question, why weren't K-9 units used to find Jahar after the shootout? Or for some reason were they unable to follow his secent?

1 - You need a dog that is trained to follow the scent trail they are given

The usual police dog runs loose and will alert on ANY human they find in the area they are told to search ... and the area was full of fences blocking access and other searchers. Bad environment compared to finding a burglar in a warehouse.

Specialist tracking dogs would have had to have been brought in, and their owners are reluctant to take their dogs into firefights, not only for the dog's safety, but because tracking dogs work on leashes.

2 - You need a reliable sample of that scent (clothing is most often used)

At that time, they had no way to get a reliable scent sample
 
Depending on where they were K-9 units could have been deployed in minutes, someone on foot in an area he didn't know and possibly injured could not have gotten too far. IIRC the weather was clear, it wasn't raining and early spring in New England should not have been especially hot or cold. How far was he found from the car?

There's a huge difference between getting a K-9 unit (cop with dog trained for police work) and getting someone with a qualified, trained tracking dog.

Most tracking dogs are privately owned and their owner/trainers would be reluctant to take a dog or themselves into a hot pursuit like that. And the handlers have to be trained to work with the tracking dog ... you can't just slap an armored doggy coat onto the bloodhound and hand him over to the SWAT dudes.
 
At that time, they had no way to get a reliable scent sample

They knew where he lived.

Just asking.

Throughout the day why didn't they use the heat sensing equipment to scan the area from helicopters?

What was the purpose of the CST personnel? Why did they return to their vehicle? Why didn't their equipment alert them to the large objects in the bomber's backpacks.?
 
They knew where he lived.

Yes, but how would they know which clothing was his, and recently worn? Or that he really LIVED there.

[/QUOTE]Throughout the day why didn't they use the heat sensing equipment to scan the area from helicopters?[/QUOTE]

Why don't you ask the Boston cops?
 
There's a huge difference between getting a K-9 unit (cop with dog trained for police work) and getting someone with a qualified, trained tracking dog.

Most tracking dogs are privately owned and their owner/trainers would be reluctant to take a dog or themselves into a hot pursuit like that. And the handlers have to be trained to work with the tracking dog ... you can't just slap an armored doggy coat onto the bloodhound and hand him over to the SWAT dudes.

K9 Unit
The [Massachusetts] State Police K-9 unit deploys approximately 41 highly trained canines to agencies throughout New England for search and rescue, criminal apprehension, narcotics detection, crowd control, missing persons searches, cadaver recovery searches, site security, arson detection, explosive detection, and other missions.​

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_State_Police
 
*snip*
Throughout the day why didn't they use the heat sensing equipment to scan the area from helicopters?
Such a method to try find a needle in a haystack? It would alert on every house in the neighborhood!
What was the purpose of the CST personnel? Why did they return to their vehicle? Why didn't their equipment alert them to the large objects in the bomber's backpacks.?
To assist with general security,wasnt aware x ray vision was amongst their techniques.
 
They knew where he lived.

Just asking.

Throughout the day why didn't they use the heat sensing equipment to scan the area from helicopters?

What was the purpose of the CST personnel? Why did they return to their vehicle? Why didn't their equipment alert them to the large objects in the bomber's backpacks.?

They wanted you to draw your own conclusions.

:rolleyes:
 
I too wondered about this.

Also didn't a third person put stuff in hatch back, while carjack victim was with them?

The carjacked fellow, going by his nickname "Danny" to avoid publicity, gave an interview just the other day. While he does recount how they began to load his SUV with items from their sedan, he doesn't mention a third person, and neither does any other article that I know of.

Carjack victim recounts his harrowing night

04-25-2013 | Boston.com | Carjack victim recounts his harrowing night said:
Directed to a quiet neighborhood in East Watertown, Danny pulled up as told on an unfamiliar side street. The sedan stopped behind him. A man approached -- the skinnier, floppy-haired “Suspect No. 2” in the photos and videos released by investigators earlier that evening -- and Tamerlan got out, ordering Danny into the passenger seat, making it clear if he tried anything he would shoot him. For several minutes, the brothers transferred heavy objects from the smaller car into Danny’s SUV. “Luggage,” Danny thought.
 
Not revealing his identity was a wise move. The last thing he needs is to become a target for the conspiracy nuts. After all, he must be in on it! :rolleyes:
 
Not revealing his identity was a wise move. The last thing he needs is to become a target for the conspiracy nuts. After all, he must be in on it! :rolleyes:
Goes for the naked guy too. If I were him I'd keep a very low profile to keep away from that mess.
 
Last edited:
Throughout the day why didn't they use the heat sensing equipment to scan the area from helicopters?
IIRC during the night and morning hours the usefulness of FLIR/helicopter was limited by the weather conditions (was described as "soupy" in the scanner). Don't know if the weather conditions improved later on and when.
 

Back
Top Bottom