Merged The Origin of Two Different Colors of WTC Dust

[Jack by the hedge]

You missed something, the word "independent". Several dozen independent researchers are needed to form a peer group. Sure, I'd like to lead a lab with fifty scientists working under me, but that's not what I was talking about.

So what do you hope this peer group will independently confirm? What actual experiments do you hope they can replicate?

We still seem to be missing a step.

1) Collect heap of dirt
2) Photograph it and wave a magnet at it
3) Assemble 50-strong team of top scientists
4) ????
5) Collect Nobel prize

 

[The Big Dog]

So what do you hope this peer group will independently confirm? What actual experiments do you hope they can replicate?

We still seem to be missing a step.

1) Collect heap of dirt
2) Photograph it and wave a magnet at it
3) Assemble 50-strong team of top scientists
4) ????
5) Collect Nobel prize

You are missing step 1.a:

1.a Remove cigarette butts from heap of dirt

 

[dafydd]

Your team is going to saddle up and ride off in all directions?

I know where that one came from

 

[Dash80]

I waded into the insanity that is Judy Woo's website today. She's our Dusty's hero isn't she?
You'd think Judy would be interested in Tracy's "WTC Dust" but I couldn't find any indication that even Dr. Woooooooooo is remotely bothered.

 

[MIKILLINI]

Different ways.

Judging by this response, you really have nothing else to add here. You really don't do any kind of tangible research, do you?

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Different ways.

Judging by this response, you really have nothing else to add here. You really don't do any kind of tangible research, do you?

How can you say that? She has top men looking into it, in different ways.

Different. Ways.
Top. Men.

 

[WTC Dust]

So the question remains: how do you intend to show that the dust you gathered came primarily from the WTC?

This has been answered.

 

[WTC Dust]

No, you have pictures of dust you claim came from the WTC. That is not the same as having WTC dust.

If my claim is correct, it is.

 

[WTC Dust]

So what do you hope this peer group will independently confirm? What actual experiments do you hope they can replicate?

We still seem to be missing a step.

1) Collect heap of dirt
2) Photograph it and wave a magnet at it
3) Assemble 50-strong team of top scientists
4) ????
5) Collect Nobel prize

Again, you're getting it wrong. These people would not be assembled by me, nor would they be working with me at all. They'd be independent. They'd be studying their own aspects of the problem.

I'm not going for a prize or personal gain. I'm going for the truth. If someone else finds it before me, that's good enough.

 

[WTC Dust]

I waded into the insanity that is Judy Woo's website today. She's our Dusty's hero isn't she?
You'd think Judy would be interested in Tracy's "WTC Dust" but I couldn't find any indication that even Dr. Woooooooooo is remotely bothered.

Dr. Wood has consistently refused to examine my work. She's an American hero, but she isn't my friend or colleague. She acts like she is the alpha and omega of 9/11 research. She took my help and my money, but she didn't credit me for it, and I don't need credit for it. I think she's a jerk.

But whatever. She did some good research.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

These people would not be assembled by me, nor would they be working with me at all. They'd be independent. They'd be studying their own aspects of the problem.

But what would they actually do?

 

[Jack by the hedge]

So the question remains: how do you intend to show that the dust you gathered came primarily from the WTC?

This has been answered.

Not in any useful sense.

No, you have pictures of dust you claim came from the WTC. That is not the same as having WTC dust.

If my claim is correct, it is.

We still don't know how you intend to demonstrate whether you are correct or not. It's reached the stage where any reasonable person can infer that you have absolutely no idea how to proceed with your 'investigation' and have no real intention of doing anything whatsoever to advance it.

 

[Dash80]

Dr. Wood has consistently refused to examine my work. She's an American hero, but she isn't my friend or colleague. She acts like she is the alpha and omega of 9/11 research. She took my help and my money, but she didn't credit me for it, and I don't need credit for it. I think she's a jerk.

But whatever. She did some good research.

She's nuts, and a fraud.

What exactly did you help her with?

 

[phiwum]

This has been answered.

Can you either repeat the answer or point me to it?

Because I don't know how you know this dust is from WTC.

 

[DGM]

Can you either repeat the answer or point me to it?

Because I don't know how you know this dust is from WTC.

It's because the DNA test she hopes to do someday will match some of the victims. She knows it will and this is all the proof she needs. She's a scientist you know.

 

[WTC Dust]

But what would they actually do?

I wouldn't be in charge of them. They'd do whatever they saw fit as scientists.

 

[WTC Dust]

Not in any useful sense.





We still don't know how you intend to demonstrate whether you are correct or not. It's reached the stage where any reasonable person can infer that you have absolutely no idea how to proceed with your 'investigation' and have no real intention of doing anything whatsoever to advance it.

I really doubt I EVER plan to demonstrate myself correct in terms that you would accept.

 

[WTC Dust]

Can you either repeat the answer or point me to it?

Because I don't know how you know this dust is from WTC.

The location of the find.
The characteristics of the material.

 

[phiwum]

The location of the find.
The characteristics of the material.

The characteristics of the material begs the question. You can't say that the collapse was caused by a remarkable event, because the dust it produced is unusual and that the dust you have must have come from the collapse, because it is unusual.

The location of the find is weak evidence, especially given also the time of the find -- years after the collapse, in a relatively accessible area.

So, your claim that the dust came from the WTC is weak, in my opinion. Now, if you show that the DNA contained therein (how do you know that there's DNA again?) actually came from victims of 9/11, well, that would certainly help your case.

 

[TheRedWorm]

I really doubt I EVER plan to demonstrate myself correct in terms that you would accept.

That's because your so called research is completely worthless to any field of 9/11 studies. All you are is some lady who found some crap somewhere and convinced yourself that you found something of significance. You did not.