How do you plan to establish whether you are correct or not?
Interesting question.
I'd need a fairly large peer group for that. They would need to be
PhD level researcher scientists who have spent at least one full year working
on the same subject as I have. I'm being generous with the year, too,
because a scientist generally has much more than one year of experience
before being asked to participate in peer review on a topic.
I'd say the number would have to be at least several dozen, maybe
fifty people, working on this to make a proper peer group.
Among these people, I'd get busy testing my theories, as in other areas
of science as it is normally conducted. There would have to be some
grants involved, a good amount of equipment devoted to these studies,
and professors at several different institutions, at a minimum, in order
to form this peer group.
Until this happens, I don't have a proper venue, so any effort I spent
on "proving myself" would be wasted, not to mention that you simply
don't spend that much time doing that anyway, as a scientist.
What you do as a scientist is devise experimental tests and
challenge your own theories. You don't go about "proving yourself"
to other people very much, although sometime this happens.
When you go for tenure, let's say, or write a grant. You do have to prove yourself in a specified way to accomplish these things.
