• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Continuation: Discussion of the George Zimmerman case

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, there's not a chance in hell that Trayvon saw a dark shape from a football field away in the dark, with no light sources anywhere, and recognized it as a human and the same human who was previously in a truck, and was sure enough to leave his home and run a length of a football field back to attempt murder on him.

We do, in fact, view this case differently.

Fact is, you don't know which houses had lights on, or exactly where GZ was when his truck's headlights shut off, etc.

If Trayvon turns the corner at the T and starts south, at a pace we have no idea of... if he's looking back and sees headlights which have stopped any sort of movement, and are facing toward the last place he knows the guy in the truck saw him, he would pretty much know for a certainty those were the guy's headlights.

If he then continues south toward Brandi Green's, and glances back again somewhat later, even if the headlights are now off, you have a GZ up there walking around on the phone, speaking (not really loudly but we don't know how far south Trayvon is at this point or how the dog path area is making the sound carry) PLUS you have GZ attempting to get one flashlight working (which could have involved some amount of light sputtering out of it and flickering from it before he gave up on it) THEN switching to a functional (albeit smaller) flashlight.

Even without any light or noise coming from GZ, the mere fact he was moving up there would be enough for me to spot him at that distance, take that to the bank. Particularly when I was 17. Moonlight would've been sufficient for me, as would low levels of light from surrounding houses, etc.

Now as for your parallel issue of you not thinking TM could recognize it as being the person who'd been following him... I think what I said about when Trayvon likely saw the headlights cease movement and continue pointing the way he'd gone, combined with considerations like hearing the person, and seeing a flashlight being used at the T area... would make it pretty clear who the person was. If he was already irritated by this guy monitoring him from his car, I don't think he'd have much confusion about who it was who was now out and about, with a flashlight, still on a phone.

Because again, there's no way to know where along that dog path TM was when he processed the fact that it was GZ out, exposed, on foot. If you're personally incredulous that he could have been all the way at Brandi Green's porch when he realized this, don't worry.... it works just as well for my point to consider that he was somewhat north of that, hiding alongside a condo.

The reason I favor a scenario where at some point he's at Brandi Green's porch, is her comment the next morning about him being out on the porch (which admittedly could refer to the last time she'd seen him before they left for the evening) plus the apparent interaction with the guys at 7-11, plus it helping explain why he ran from GZ (to ditch something incriminating)

but there's plenty of time for all of this, between when he's last seen by GZ at the T, and when the first 911 calls are coming in. Plenty of time for him to run not too far south down the dog walk, duck behind a condo white fence segment/bush whatever... see GZ make it to the top of the T, hear him speaking to what seems to be police, see him using his flashlight, get even MORE irritated, jog down to Brandi's after GZ crosses past the T to the east area, drop off blunts or whatever... run back north, catch GZ as he's making his way back westward toward his car.

I don't believe murder was on TM's mind. I believe a "knockout king" one punch flooring of GZ was the idea. I think TM was a serial delinquent constantly suspended from his second high school, likely pulled out of his first high school for similar reasons... sick of getting in trouble, and I think GZ was the last straw. TM probably thought "I wasn't even doing anything and this guy is dogging me?" then got irritated he was forced to run, irritated he had to worry about police catching him with whatever he may have had... and once he no longer had anything incriminating on him, he might have gone up north with vague intentions. Maybe confront the guy, maybe punch him... depends on who he turns out to be. If TM had gotten there and found the guy to be large and powerful looking, might have just told him off. If he'd gotten there to find the guy wearing some sort of community security jacket or something... probably would have just tried to embarrass him by telling him he was a guest of Brandi Green. If he'd gotten there to find the police parking next to GZ's truck, again, probably just stick around long enough to explain himself, embarrass GZ in front of cops, etc.

What he did find was a short little man with seemingly no official capacity or backup at all... and I think his poor impulse control (demonstrated by those suspensions and what GZ describes) got the better of him, and he decided to try for a quick retribution one punch knockout. I think when that didn't pan out, he improvised poorly and I think the mouth covering was entirely a "STFU" type thing, not a "smother you to death" thing. I think he was used to fighting against people who fought back, and someone wailing in terror trying to alert neighbors threw him off a bit.

This is all very deep into speculation territory, but I think it helps understand the motivations which may have been at play. Seems that everyone believes at least one person behaved in illogical, violent ways that night... don't see why it can't be TM rather than GZ.
 
BTW, I think if GZ were this constant, unrepentant liar who didn't hesitate to fabricate things to make him look better that people try to make him out to be...

1.) He wouldn't have mentioned anything about reaching for his phone
2.) He would have claimed his last words to Trayvon before being punched were "the cops are on their way"
3.) He would have clearly accounted for the movement south from the outset, not hard to lie about that if he's just lying constantly
 
BTW, I think if GZ were this constant, unrepentant liar who didn't hesitate to fabricate things to make him look better that people try to make him out to be...

1.) He wouldn't have mentioned anything about reaching for his phone
2.) He would have claimed his last words to Trayvon before being punched were "the cops are on their way"
3.) He would have clearly accounted for the movement south from the outset, not hard to lie about that if he's just lying constantly

Someone lying on the spur of the moment because they realize they just shot an unarmed kid isn't going to be the suave professional you see in movies; they're going to be trying to hold down panic and are going to make very obvious mistakes like this. This is how people get caught in the first place.

Something to keep in mind. If George was lying at all, there's no guarantee that he would have been lying either effectively or consistently; the truth is the only thing that has a tendency to be consistent across the board, and even then memories are pretty crappy; see the "implanted childhood memories" shtick that people are getting busted for when their shrink helps them "remember" things that never happened.
 
STATE’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STATE ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES & COSTS (RE: MIAMI VIDEO DEPOSITONS)

14. On the morning of 3/13/2013, the State arrived at the deposition room and after seeing the elaborate videotaping equipment and being told by Defense Counsel that it planned to videotape all the Miami witnesses’ depositions, informed Counsel of our objection. In addition, Witness 8 the first scheduled witness who had done everything she could to conceal her identity was scared and didn’t want to be videotaped. There was a discussion among the parties of the legality of videotaping witnesses’ depositions.

15. Both sides agreed to contact the Court to get a ruling -on the videotaping. Defense Counsel called the Court's Judicial Assistant and informed her that we needed to talk to the
Court about this issue. This Court was busy with regular scheduled hearings and other matters and was unable to hear the objection until later that day.

16. The Court heard arguments from both sides and denied the State's objection permitting videotaping of the witnesses depositions, but ordered that the recordings be sealed.
 
I'm sure plenty of witnesses don't like being video taped. Yet, in the Case Anthony case video taped depositions of everyone as far as I recall, were all done and were all made available to the public rapidly.

What is it about Witness 8 which makes her so special? I'd wager it's one of two things:

1.) She really is a scared young lady who just doesn't want to be identified, and this is why she sat on information about her best friend being murdered for weeks, before finally not coming forward, but rather having to be hunted down by Crump. This also explains her reticence about being videotaped for her deposition. BDLR and the state are merely reflecting her desires and advocating for her in this regard by pushing back against O'Mara.

2.) The reason she wants to avoid being seen on tape is the same reason she lied about her age, lied about her whereabouts during Trayvon's wake, and seemingly offered to lie to BDLR at least twice during her deposition with him. She's a liar, and is lying about nearly everything, or everything of importance, in her account.

My money is on option 2.
 
Yes, there's not a chance in hell that Trayvon saw a dark shape from a football field away in the dark, with no light sources anywhere, and recognized it as a human and the same human who was previously in a truck, and was sure enough to leave his home and run a length of a football field back to attempt murder on him.

We do, in fact, view this case differently.

On a rainy night. Skeptic Tank's wondervision apart, nobody could do that.
 
Last edited:
On a rainy night. Skeptic Tank's wondervision, apart, nobody could do that.

You can't see someone 350 feet away from you at 7pm with "a little bit dripping water" (to use Deedee's phrase) ?

No wondervision required. Just regular human eyes...

But again, he doesn't have to have seen him from Brandi Green's for what I'm suggesting. He could have spotted him from much further north than that.

Remember, GZ was talking on a phone and fiddling with flashlights, too.

No moonlight, dark enough that GZ needed a flashlight to go back to the car, droplets of rain scattering the little available light... No, I couldn't recognize anyone 100 m away, and neither could you.

Recognize anyone? We're not talking about him seeing GZ's face clearly. We're talking about him seeing a figure, wandering around in the same place he knows GZ last saw him... fiddling with flashlights and possibly audibly talking.

And again, if it helps you be less incredulous, all you need to do is substitute him being halfway down the dogwalk or one third of the way down, hiding when he recognizes GZ is out of his truck and moving around in that area.
 
Last edited:

I like number 17:

The State understands the Court has already ruled and is not asking the Court to reconsider the ruling for any future depositions; however the reasons and legal basis for objecting are restated below in response to the Defendant's motion.

IOW, BDLR wants to make sure he gets his two cents in, even though there was no actual legal basis for objecting.
 
You can't see someone 350 feet away from you at 7pm with "a little bit dripping water" (to use Deedee's phrase) ?

No wondervision required. Just regular human eyes...

But again, he doesn't have to have seen him from Brandi Green's for what I'm suggesting. He could have spotted him from much further north than that.

Remember, GZ was talking on a phone and fiddling with flashlights, too.

No moonlight, dark enough that GZ needed a flashlight to go back to the car, droplets of rain scattering the little available light... No, I couldn't recognize anyone 100 m away, and neither could you.
 
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

COMES NOW the Petitioner, GEORGE ZIMMERMAN, by and through his undersigned counsel pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.1 00( c) and 9.030(b )(2)(A), and Article V, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution, and petitions the Court for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari reversing the lower court's orders dated March 4, 2013 and March 28, 2013 denying Petitioner's discovery request to take the deposition of attorney Benjamin Crump.
 
Was just checking distances, it's about a city block... you can't see someone a city block away at night? Really?

I think some people may want to get their eyes checked.

Again, this is particularly easy if the person is making noise and using flashlights.
 
Was just checking distances, it's about a city block... you can't see someone a city block away at night? Really?

I think some people may want to get their eyes checked.

Again, this is particularly easy if the person is making noise and using flashlights.

I might see someone, under very favorable conditions on a night as described. The phone light probably wouldn't cut it, unless GZ had it on speaker. The flashlight didn't work, so no help there either. So there might be a very slim chance to see someone 100 m away, in the middle of buildings, with no street light, moonlight or lights from the buildings.

However, and that was my claim, there's no chance of me recognizing that person. Or you. Or anyone.
 
I might see someone, under very favorable conditions on a night as described. The phone light probably wouldn't cut it, unless GZ had it on speaker. The flashlight didn't work, so no help there either. So there might be a very slim chance to see someone 100 m away, in the middle of buildings, with no street light, moonlight or lights from the buildings.

However, and that was my claim, there's no chance of me recognizing that person. Or you. Or anyone.

Do we know exactly which houses did or did not have any light emanating from them at that point? I think clearly, we do not. We have GZ's description that it was dark back there... right? But that's about it.

The larger flashlight didn't work reliably, doesn't mean it didn't emit some light before GZ gave up on it. The smaller flashlight on the keychain was working, and found illuminated by police, right? So, GZ was creating flashlight-based light, up at the top of the T.

Now as for recognition? Direct visual recognition from that distance? No. Contextual recognition given the stopped headlights and previous monitoring by GZ? For sure.

Direct visual recognition may have been possible if TM was seeing this all from halfway down the dog walk or less, but I believe even from Brandi Green's or near it, contextual recognition was possible. And seeing at least some flashlight usage from that distance, was possible.
 
Holy crap. They don't have time to prepare for trial, but they have time to write 40 page motions about Mr. Crump?

Does O'Mara have a drug problem? I ask this in all seriousness. He doesn't seem to be doing right by his client.
 
By the way, it appears the court did allow Witness 8 to be video taped that day. So aside from a several hour delay while they objected to the judge, O'Mara's entire motion for sanctions was based on a single day's worth of back and forth, which included arguments in front of the court, and was resolved on the same day.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/132536681/2nd-O-Mara-Motion-for-Sanctions-Fees

Nefarious!!!

COVER UP!!!
 
Holy crap. They don't have time to prepare for trial, but they have time to write 40 page motions about Mr. Crump?

Does O'Mara have a drug problem? I ask this in all seriousness. He doesn't seem to be doing right by his client.

You're setting it up as an either/or situation, when it's not.

A big aspect of why they don't feel they can have things prepared to their satisfaction by June, is exactly the same thing causing them to make this motion. They consider deposing Crump to be crucial to preparing for the case. I can see where they're coming from.

It's a bit like saying "Corporal, I told you to secure this bridge... you said you don't have enough time to do it properly with the resources I've given you, but somehow you have enough time to requisition more barricades and sandbags?!?!?!"

Plus, we don't know the inner-workings of the O'Mara law firm. Are these motions written up largely by legal aides with only a certain amount of oversight by O'Mara, giving suggestions and checking the final version before releasing it? Or are they written directly by him? Who knows.
 
Holy crap. They don't have time to prepare for trial, but they have time to write 40 page motions about Mr. Crump?

Does O'Mara have a drug problem? I ask this in all seriousness. He doesn't seem to be doing right by his client.

No, you don't. I refuse to believe you.
 
Yes, there's not a chance in hell that Trayvon saw a dark shape from a football field away in the dark, with no light sources anywhere, and recognized it as a human and the same human who was previously in a truck, and was sure enough to leave his home and run a length of a football field back to attempt murder on him.

We do, in fact, view this case differently.

Also, how and why would Martin sprint back to the house he was staying, stand around looking all the way to the opposite end of the alleyway, and when he spots George, sprint all the way back, *unarmed*, and try to kill Zimmerman? This would put him at a major disadvantage in any fight, since he'd go into it tired from all the running around he was doing, and he'd be ignoring the many obvious weapons that almost any house contains.

I think this is another theory that gets thrown into the trash pretty quickly.
 
By the way, it appears the court did allow Witness 8 to be video taped that day. So aside from a several hour delay while they objected to the judge, O'Mara's entire motion for sanctions was based on a single day's worth of back and forth, which included arguments in front of the court, and was resolved on the same day.

I thought I remembered him referencing a nearly year long period of gaming the discovery and the unnecessary expenses and work for the defense which that created, also.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom