Merged The Origin of Two Different Colors of WTC Dust

[ozeco41]

....with a proper power supply?

The first question us engineers ask think of - we wouldn't waste time asking. .

 

[Dash80]

Can you provide a link or post up your research.

I have seen your avatar and the two pictures you provided, is that all of your research ?

She doesn't have any research.

She parrots her hero Judy Wood's nonsense and jumps on the bandwagon by scraping up some crap and calling it "foamed iron/metallic WTC dust."

 

[WTC Dust]

Yes, and I can imagine myself right alongside Frodo watching Gollum tumble into the fires of Mount Doom.

Reality, aye, that's the rub.

Where's a working sample of your proposed destructive device, with a proper power supply?

Now I feel all ... foamy ... for even bothering to reply.


Sheesh, I try to be a little lighthearted. Some people take themselves so seriously around here.

There is a reason that the WTC dust was "foamy". It's because it was made
of jagged edges of iron fragments that did not align smoothly with each other as they would have if they were round and smooth. The edges of the iron fragments got hung up on other edges, leaving space in between the fragments.

 

[WTC Dust]

Can you provide a link or post up your research.

I have seen your avatar and the two pictures you provided, is that all of your research ?

LOL! No. It's impossible to describe 11.5 years of research on the JREF forum. What I have posted are little tidbits of evidence to test some of my ideas.

 

[WTC Dust]

She doesn't have any research.

She parrots her hero Judy Wood's nonsense and jumps on the bandwagon by scraping up some crap and calling it "foamed iron/metallic WTC dust."

This is 100% wrong.
I do not parrot Judy Wood. In fact, I critique her. Yes, it's mostly a favorable critique, but I point out her mistakes.

Wood says NOTHING about metallic foam. That's my work. Wood says almost nothing about the multiple colors of WTC dust. I do. She probably doesn't have any WTC dust, and she certainly doesn't publicize any experiments she might have conducted on the dust if she does have any.

 

[Dash80]

LOL! No. It's impossible to describe 11.5 years of research on the JREF forum. What I have posted are little tidbits of evidence to test some of my ideas.

You could TELL us what tests you have done, and the methods you used.

This is 100% wrong.
I do not parrot Judy Wood. In fact, I critique her. Yes, it's mostly a favorable critique, but I point out her mistakes.

Wood says NOTHING about metallic foam. That's my work. Wood says almost nothing about the multiple colors of WTC dust. I do. She probably doesn't have any WTC dust, and she certainly doesn't publicize any experiments she might have conducted on the dust if she does have any.

Actually I subjected myself to a look at Judy's site today and a lot of the crap she comes up with has been repeated by you.

All you have done is add your own personal spin to it.

 

[plague311]

I'm confused, but that seems to be the point of this thread.

What could possibly turn steel into lighter-than-air foam that instantly re-transforms into solid but burnt and wrecked steel scraps in such a way that the only person on Earth who notices is a random internet forum user... other than drug-induced delirium?

Nope, looks like you have it all figured out.

Dust, how do you store this "foamy dust"?

 

[Skibum]

LOL! No. It's impossible to describe 11.5 years of research on the JREF forum. What I have posted are little tidbits of evidence to test some of my ideas.

So, after 11.5 years all you are able to show us is a few pictures you took of the dust ?

 

[swright777]

LOL! No. It's impossible to describe 11.5 years of research on the JREF forum. What I have posted are little tidbits of evidence to test some of my ideas.

You stated in a previous post (last year) that you believed the official story until 2004 or 2005. How did you do 11.5 years of research in less then 9 years?

And you didn't get your 'sample' until around 2008. So your dust research couldn't have been going on for more than 5 years.

 

[Sunstealer]

11 1/2 years and only managed to produce a badly out of focus picture with too much light of some unknown material. It's hilarious.

 

[carlitos]

...your proposed destructive device, with a proper power supply?

jammonius told us that the death ray harnessed its power from the hurricane that was raging offshore a few hundred miles. That would be amazing.

 

[LSSBB]

jammonius told us that the death ray harnessed its power from the hurricane that was raging offshore a few hundred miles. That would be amazing.

Good point. If I were to add "and a transmission method for the power" would that be moving the goalposts?

 

[Dash80]

Good point. If I were to add "and a transmission method for the power" would that be moving the goalposts?

No that would be a "Gotcha" or "rhetoric"

 

[WTC Dust]

Nope, looks like you have it all figured out.

Dust, how do you store this "foamy dust"?

Double sealed in plastic, stored in plastic boxes at room temperature.

 

[The Big Dog]

Double sealed in plastic, stored in plastic boxes at room temperature.

Did you save the cigarette butts too?

 

[Dash80]

I've been telling you about the tests I've done and performed.

You've shown some pictures and made claims, that's all.

Where does Wood talk about the metallic foam? Where does Wood talk
about the two colors of WTC dust? Where does Wood talk about the
timing and color changes of the fumes?

These are things I focus on. Judy Wood has a difficult-to-navigate
website, but it is jam packed with an encyclopedia of forensic evidence.
The similarity between us is that we talk about the forensic evidence,
and have come to similar conclusions based on our results.

The truth is the truth, no matter who speaks is. She and I are merely
the two scientists who talk about the forensic evidence more than
anyone else. She talks about the widest range of forensic evidence.
I focus on the WTC dust more narrowly but more in depth.

You're bloody kidding me right? Judy's site is full of woo, and stupidity such as "lather," "snowball" and "cauliflower!"

Yawn, you still haven't shown your dust is from the WTC.

 

[WTC Dust]

Can you provide a link or post up your research.

I have seen your avatar and the two pictures you provided, is that all of your research ?

Yes. The avatar and two pictures is the sum total of what I've been
able to discover in 11.5 years. I'm a very slow worker.

 

[Sunstealer]

Yes. The avatar and two pictures is the sum total of what I've been
able to discover in 11.5 years. I'm a very slow worker.

Stundied!

 

[Dog Town]

i'm a very slow worker.

true!

 

[Craig4]

Can you imagine that I might be right about this?

That's not a realistic concern.