Merged The Origin of Two Different Colors of WTC Dust

That's not at all what I'm claiming. I'm claiming that what are commonly referred to as "fires" weren't fires as we traditionally understand them. I attribute ALL of the damage done to the
WTC as coming from the use of advanced weaponry. I don't mix
in jet fuel or explosive devices in with it.

One problem: They were obviously fires. Very traditional hot stinking, smoking fires that drove people to jump out of windows.

You are in fantasy-land.

Hans
 
I'd advise that you give the newbie a heavy dose of Thorazine before viewing. This should lessen the violent reactions and keep the convulsions (of laughter) under control.


Ohhh, yeah.
The Zine sisters.
Thora & Stella.
...
I did 'em.
[/DiceMode]
 
The two colors of dust are impossible to deny.
If you haven't heard it before, at least you've heard it today.

The two colors say everything, if you pay attention, but not if you
ignore it.
 
The two colors of dust are impossible to deny.
If you haven't heard it before, at least you've heard it today.

The two colors say everything, if you pay attention, but not if you
ignore it.

The photos you presented had 44,813 and 11,881 unique colors. Which 2? If you can't explain, or define which two colors, then what are you doing? It is not science. It appears you don't know what colors are, like your foam physics.

Why can't you define the two colors?
 
Last edited:
The two colors of dust are impossible to deny.
If you haven't heard it before, at least you've heard it today.

The two colors say everything, if you pay attention, but not if you
ignore it.

Something is impossible to deny, but it's not what you think it is.
 
The two colors of dust are impossible to deny.
If you haven't heard it before, at least you've heard it today.

The two colors say everything, if you pay attention, but not if you
ignore it.

What's happened to this thread? It's almost like no one is interested in the greatest scientific discovery in a thousand years.

This 2 color thing is exactly the point of the photo I posted. It's proof positive that this foamification technology was around decades before 9/11. Do you think this could mean that David Ike is right and reptiles control the world? Would that make my theory about trained animals controlling the foamification machine is true? Technically reptiles are animals, but the Reptoids are an intelligent species and wouldn’t need training.

I like this thread because it leads to the really important questions about 9/11that just get ignored all the time on the JREF. We have to hear all the time about oil companies, the Israelis and most of all Da' Juzz. But the really important issue is whether 9/11 is the first blow in the rebellion of animals against their masters. Just think of it. This is really an important thread.


I like this thread because it leads to the really important questions about 9/11that just get ignored all the time on the JREF. We have to hear all the time about oil companies, the Israelis and most of all Da' Juzz. But the really issue is whether 9/11 is the first blow in the rebellion of animals against their masters. Just think of it. This is really an impofrtant thread.
 
The sample you found on the street years after the attack? Who told you it was dust from the WTC?

I didn't find it in the street. I found it in my home. In a nook, open to the outside air but protected from rain by a concrete overhang. Nobody needed to tell me it was WTC dust, because I had been studying WTC dust for more than 8 years at the time.
 
I forgot to add a point about the DNA. Lots of human beings died in the WTC, and I have some of their DNA. One thing I'd do (if I had PLENTY) of money would be to do a DNA comparative test and match it up with the family database and return some of the remains to the families. The scientific significance of the location of the dust is that it was present in some, but not all, types of WTC dust. The victims didn't run to the elevator shafts. They ran to the windows. The DNA isn't located in the WTC dust that came from the elevator shafts, the darker dust. It's in the lighter colored dust, the part that came from the perimeter of the buildings.
 
I forgot to add a point about the DNA. Lots of human beings died in the WTC, and I have some of their DNA. One thing I'd do (if I had PLENTY) of money would be to do a DNA comparative test and match it up with the family database and return some of the remains to the families. The scientific significance of the location of the dust is that it was present in some, but not all, types of WTC dust. The victims didn't run to the elevator shafts. They ran to the windows. The DNA isn't located in the WTC dust that came from the elevator shafts, the darker dust. It's in the lighter colored dust, the part that came from the perimeter of the buildings.
What method did you use to determine it was human DNA?
 
I forgot to add a point about the DNA. Lots of human beings died in the WTC, and I have some of their DNA. One thing I'd do (if I had PLENTY) of money would be to do a DNA comparative test and match it up with the family database and return some of the remains to the families. The scientific significance of the location of the dust is that it was present in some, but not all, types of WTC dust. The victims didn't run to the elevator shafts. They ran to the windows. The DNA isn't located in the WTC dust that came from the elevator shafts, the darker dust. It's in the lighter colored dust, the part that came from the perimeter of the buildings.

More nonsense.

1.The darker "dust" you identify in photos of the towers is smoke and ash from the fires.

2. The perimeter columns and core structures were both steel, why would this produce different dust?

3. Many people did go to the windows, many jumped from them. However a lot of people were within the core when the buildings came down, in the stairwells and even trapped in elevators.

4. You have not proven your dust/foam even came from the WTC, let alone that it contains victim DNA.
 
Last edited:
More nonsense.

1.The darker "dust" you identify in photos of the towers is smoke and ash from the fires.

2. The perimeter columns and core structures were both steel, why would this produce different dust?

3. Many people did go to the windows, many jumped from them. However a lot of people were within the core when the buildings came down, in the stairwells and even trapped in elevators.

4. You have not proven your dust/foam even came from the WTC, let alone that it contains victim DNA.

1. Microscopic images show iron fragments in large abundance in the dust.
2. The steel didn't produce different colored iron fragments. The perimeters of the buildings were composed of more that just iron, unlike the elevator shafts. The elevator shafts were made of steel and empty space. The lighter dust contains a lot of iron fragments, but it's lighter because of the other materials that are also in the dust. The darker dust is almost entirely iron fragments.
3. There were some people trapped in elevators, but most of them moved to the perimeter. I'm not saying they didn't die in the stairwells or the elevator shafts, but rather that I did not detect DNA in the darker dust, which is consistent with the people moving towards the perimeter.
4. True on both accounts.
 
Last edited:
1. Microscopic images show iron fragments in large abundance in the dust.
2. The steel didn't produce different colored iron fragments. The perimeters of the buildings were composed of more that just iron, unlike the elevator shafts. The elevator shafts were made of steel and empty space. The lighter dust contains a lot of iron fragments, but it's lighter because of the other materials that are also in the dust. The darker dust is almost entirely iron fragments.
3. There were some people trapped in elevators, but most of them moved to the perimeter. I'm not saying they didn't die in the stairwells or the elevator shafts, but rather that I did not detect DNA in the darker dust, which is consistent with the people moving towards the perimeter.
4. True on both accounts.

How did you test for DNA? Details please.
 

Back
Top Bottom