Are you kidding me? You've never done any science have you? In this particular case, the characteristic is irrelevant at this moment - it is the door that leads to the assumption of the existence that matters. If the key to the door exists, then there has to be a testable hypothesis. It's stated in Revelation.
I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End, (the False and the True.)
I clearly stated the alternative hypothesis w.r.t. to that deamam's short sentence. The hypothesis stated that a tech super-advanced agency hacked his brain, composed and executed the sentence. But, as usual, the atheists say no, but are unwilling to participate in defending the opposing null hypothesis by legitimate means. Folks like bruto would engage in unrelated double speak rather than do a bit of science that he and others like him pray to.
There is also a good chance that the mods would delete the post where the hypothesis testing is done, as it already happened once in the thread,because folks like bruto would ad hominem deaman or me, as it happened and so there is a reason for the deletion.
Hard atheism is more or less a mindless assault on the phenomenon of modern religion. It's not the sharp tool capable of testing a hypothesis without mercy. That's what I've learned about it.
Very dedicated, though.