Macgyver1968
Philosopher
Shills...so quick to respond.
Almsot as if they were sitting in a cubicle paid to do this or something.
Merged No Planes At WTC (Split from: WTC Dust)
- Thread starter WTC Dust
- Start date
- Status
BCR
Master Poster
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2008
- Messages
- 2,278
Wow, I always wondered how 'they' pulled it off.
How did they get the pre-recorded digital CGI effect planes in the eyes of the witnesses? Is this an all knowing CGI effect with perspective control, a 3D special effect beamed to each eyeball, or projected on the the visual center of the brain? Was this an episode of Heroes? ... ratings are dropping.
Yes, we are all in a cubical, responding to a failed attempt to mimic the best of 911 truth.
Did take 2 years come November to read this thread? Find it? 11 years, and when is the ETIC for understanding 911 for you?
Last edited:
Starving for Truth
Thinker
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2012
- Messages
- 194
Regarding the question of what "eyewitnesses" saw, if it was not planes:
I don't know. Eyewitness can be paid, and videos can be faked.
Or maybe the witnesses did indeed see some flying object. Perhaps a bird that looked like a plane impacted the towers, triggering a giant nanothermite explosion which was meant to realistically simulate a plane impact. I really don't know, and all this is pure speculation.
This is why we need a new, impartial investigation into the mysterious events of 9-11.
I don't know. Eyewitness can be paid, and videos can be faked.
Or maybe the witnesses did indeed see some flying object. Perhaps a bird that looked like a plane impacted the towers, triggering a giant nanothermite explosion which was meant to realistically simulate a plane impact. I really don't know, and all this is pure speculation.
This is why we need a new, impartial investigation into the mysterious events of 9-11.
Last edited:
Birds with two big engines putting out 50,000 pounds of thrust, and the exact sound signature of Engines, like jet engines, but not like, exactly jet engine noise.?
Need to step up the lies to mimic 911 truth. Disrespect the dead, make up some real nasty stuff.
swright777
Muse
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2012
- Messages
- 897
Shills...so quick to respond.
Almsot as if they were sitting in a cubicle paid to do this or something.
I'm sitting in my office (sorry, not a cubicle) getting paid by the federal government while I type this. But I'm not getting paid to type this.
twinstead
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 12,374
In an alternate universe where there wasn't any debris, you may have a point. In this universe, there was a bunch of debris.
fitzgibbon
Master Poster
So what if he's a Poe (And yes he probably is)? Does that somehow make what he's doing better?
Disseminating wrong information "ironically" or to make some pretentious point doesn't make disseminating wrong information any better. Hell Poes don't even have the sometimes semi-legitimate excuse of just maybe being honestly mistaken to fall back on.
*Shrugs* Practice. Arguing with a troll is the debate equivalent to swinging two bats on the on deck circle.
Last edited:
WTC Dust
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 3,529
Does Biomedical Science have anything to do with 9/11?
On the day of 9/11, I knew that it was very unlikely that I would personally be the one who discovered what destroyed the WTC because, my background is in pharmacology, but to be truthful, I only studied pharmacology for five years. I studied chemistry for eleven years. My background is chemistry. Yeah, I specialized in the chemistry of biological processes, but whoopdeedoo. What I was doing every day was chemistry. Where I lacked a bit was physics, but I knew that my chemistry could play a role.
My knowledge of chemistry, especially, was a key aspect of my instant recognition that something was wrong about the plane crash story. What I see in the 9/11 videos as a chemist is a large amount of steel standing still...and then a large amount of various colors of gray material coming from the building. I've performed enough chemical reactions to know how things generally go, and things don't generally go like this in the laboratory.
In the laboratory, if you add any amount of jet fuel at atmospheric pressure to any amount of steel, and if you then light the jet fuel on fire, what you would get is a short lived fire and warmed, solid steel, with most of its strength. Yes, heating the steel up to the maximum combustion temperature would have resulted in some decrease in material strength of the steel, but not much.
But that is not the first thought I had. The first thought I had was, "Where did all this dust come from?" I was not on Manhattan on the day of 9/11. I was traveling back to Manhattan from a road trip. When I got to Delaware, I did not expect to see the black horizon coming from very near the place where I lived on Bleecker Street. When I got out of the truck after ditching it in a parking garage near midtown, I did not expect to smell this particular smell.
Smell is chemistry. As a biologist I know about smells. I know how smells happen and what makes a smell. This particular smell was more than a smell. It was a painful feeling, and the smell that was attached to this painful feeling was unlike anything I'd ever smelled before. It didn't fit any of my smell categories. I now know that I was inhaling particles of iron, which caused the weird smell and the pain, but I didn't know that then. All I knew was that it wasn't a biological smell and that I could also smell the decaying human bodies. That was harsh. I'll never forget the smell of those bodies. That means that bits and pieces of the people that died entered my body, as did the powdered remains of the WTC.
The day I got home, I talked to two people who were caught up in the dust cloud. Neither one was burned.
Then 100 days later, I could still smell the unique WTC stench, so I had an additional data point. Whatever happened on 9/11/2001 didn't end on 9/11/2001. I could still smell it on 12/21/2001, 100 days later, as strong as in the first few days.
I swore I'd never stop searching for the correct answer to what happened on 9/11. I swore that nobody could ever change my mind that what I was smelling on day 100 was a normal office fire. But I didn't know that I'd eventually make real discoveries that ranked with the best in the world, which happened a few years ago when I discovered a large cache of WTC dust. That was somewhat lucky (if you consider 8 years of searching to be lucky).
On 9/11, I didn't think that I would make any important discoveries related to discovering the real weapon. But I knew I would recognize the correct answer if I ever encountered it. I had a rubric that would identify correct and even partially correct answers.
Whatever destroyed the WTC it:
1. was not an extremely hot process, and
2. produced fumes that were resistant to fire fighting efforts and occasionally heavy rain for at least 100 days.
Anyone who suggested a mechanism of WTC destruction had to fulfill these criteria, or they were wrong. Which is why I knew Steven Jones was wrong as soon as I read about his thermite theory, and why I'm not convinced that Judy Wood is wrong (because her mechanism doesn't require heat). She has not yet explained the long lasting nature of the WTC fumes, but I can't fault her for that, because neither have I. My work continues.
On the day of 9/11, I knew that it was very unlikely that I would personally be the one who discovered what destroyed the WTC because, my background is in pharmacology, but to be truthful, I only studied pharmacology for five years. I studied chemistry for eleven years. My background is chemistry. Yeah, I specialized in the chemistry of biological processes, but whoopdeedoo. What I was doing every day was chemistry. Where I lacked a bit was physics, but I knew that my chemistry could play a role.
My knowledge of chemistry, especially, was a key aspect of my instant recognition that something was wrong about the plane crash story. What I see in the 9/11 videos as a chemist is a large amount of steel standing still...and then a large amount of various colors of gray material coming from the building. I've performed enough chemical reactions to know how things generally go, and things don't generally go like this in the laboratory.
In the laboratory, if you add any amount of jet fuel at atmospheric pressure to any amount of steel, and if you then light the jet fuel on fire, what you would get is a short lived fire and warmed, solid steel, with most of its strength. Yes, heating the steel up to the maximum combustion temperature would have resulted in some decrease in material strength of the steel, but not much.
But that is not the first thought I had. The first thought I had was, "Where did all this dust come from?" I was not on Manhattan on the day of 9/11. I was traveling back to Manhattan from a road trip. When I got to Delaware, I did not expect to see the black horizon coming from very near the place where I lived on Bleecker Street. When I got out of the truck after ditching it in a parking garage near midtown, I did not expect to smell this particular smell.
Smell is chemistry. As a biologist I know about smells. I know how smells happen and what makes a smell. This particular smell was more than a smell. It was a painful feeling, and the smell that was attached to this painful feeling was unlike anything I'd ever smelled before. It didn't fit any of my smell categories. I now know that I was inhaling particles of iron, which caused the weird smell and the pain, but I didn't know that then. All I knew was that it wasn't a biological smell and that I could also smell the decaying human bodies. That was harsh. I'll never forget the smell of those bodies. That means that bits and pieces of the people that died entered my body, as did the powdered remains of the WTC.
The day I got home, I talked to two people who were caught up in the dust cloud. Neither one was burned.
Then 100 days later, I could still smell the unique WTC stench, so I had an additional data point. Whatever happened on 9/11/2001 didn't end on 9/11/2001. I could still smell it on 12/21/2001, 100 days later, as strong as in the first few days.
I swore I'd never stop searching for the correct answer to what happened on 9/11. I swore that nobody could ever change my mind that what I was smelling on day 100 was a normal office fire. But I didn't know that I'd eventually make real discoveries that ranked with the best in the world, which happened a few years ago when I discovered a large cache of WTC dust. That was somewhat lucky (if you consider 8 years of searching to be lucky).
On 9/11, I didn't think that I would make any important discoveries related to discovering the real weapon. But I knew I would recognize the correct answer if I ever encountered it. I had a rubric that would identify correct and even partially correct answers.
Whatever destroyed the WTC it:
1. was not an extremely hot process, and
2. produced fumes that were resistant to fire fighting efforts and occasionally heavy rain for at least 100 days.
Anyone who suggested a mechanism of WTC destruction had to fulfill these criteria, or they were wrong. Which is why I knew Steven Jones was wrong as soon as I read about his thermite theory, and why I'm not convinced that Judy Wood is wrong (because her mechanism doesn't require heat). She has not yet explained the long lasting nature of the WTC fumes, but I can't fault her for that, because neither have I. My work continues.
Mojo
Mostly harmless
fitzgibbon
Master Poster
What Mojo sed
Fitz
Fitz
Sunstealer
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 3,128
No
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
Your post is nothing, WTC Dust.
Oystein
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 18,903
Dear WTC Dust,
I have just one question:
Can you point us to one person, only one single person, in the entire world who believes you are actually onto something with your 9/11 research? Just one name? A link, quote, citiation would be nice, too.
If there is not one person living in the world today who gives a crap about your fantasies, why should anyone care and respond?
I have just one question:
Can you point us to one person, only one single person, in the entire world who believes you are actually onto something with your 9/11 research? Just one name? A link, quote, citiation would be nice, too.
If there is not one person living in the world today who gives a crap about your fantasies, why should anyone care and respond?
- Status