calwaterbear... I'm not going to waste time cutting up your post into individual quotes and answering each one. You're (not "your") not worth the time and neither is Meldrum.
I don't need to talk to Meldrum - I get the info from the horse's mouth by reading his books, "paper" and watching his videos and TV programs.
Meldrum can answer, refute, demand an apology, or challenge me to a duel at sundown, whenever he has the
courage to register here and post.
I told you he referred to
Parcher and
Kit in a very derogatory way in one of his presentations to the faithful. That indicates that Meldrum is here or has someone reporting to him as Parcher's arguments were only on the
JREF.
HMMM...It seems like Meldrum is refusing to eyeball the people he wants to deride too! You better get on that calwaterbear!
I also gave you an example of somebody refuting Meldrum face to face about "dermal ridges" and Meldrum still using it as defining evidence of squatch. You did not address that major point. Why?
Here's another one you can chew on: Meldrum also knows that a real honest to goodness expert (Hi Anton!) refuted the the "Skookum lay" and he still uses the Elk ass print as evidence without blushing.
Those examples show there is nothing to be gained by seeking the man out to personally debate with him. Over the years he has indicated no willingness to retract his BS when confronted with the evidence unless he is embarrassed in a very public way. (A case in point is when he fell for a ridiculous hoax video - gave it the "thumbs up" on TV - and then had to admit his error when the hoaxers 'fessed up).
I am not holding
MikeG accountable for Meldrum's actions. Where do you get that ridiculous idea?
Why am I less accountable than you are?
