Tontar,
If you put down the trackway I wish you would "confess". As RayG's timeline showed, the experts were falling all over themselves saying how promising the trackway looked. Bravo to you or whomever!
If you are giving up bigfootery why don't you give us the scoop on the KK hoax about finding the patty suit?
LOL, nope, I'm not giving up bigfootery, not completely anyway. It goes in cycles, my interest and participation that is. It's spring, the weather is awesome, and my other hobbies really consume me, and they are sheer fun and excitement. Writing that, I realize it sounds a bit like Kitakaze's swan song thing, where he talked about the passions of women and all that. Well, I'm a bit older, married with kids, and so I'm not finding new women to turn me away from the pleasures of bigfootery. I fly, and it's flying season, and so that's where my time (and thoughts) go.
I honestly don't know any more about the Patty suit than anyone else does. Kit never confided in me anything that was not posted on the forums. There always was that suspicion, but there are always a lot of suspicions that make for increased drama that just don't have the goods behind them. Last thing I read on it was in the Mathilda thread on the BFF, where Bill said that Kit told him he'd verified the Patty suit via a live phone camera link with a contact, where that person did something like a Skype or iChat video with him, while they were in the room with the suit. So, if that's the case, then it would explain why there is no photos coming forth of the Patty suit, it was a live video feed look at it. That's all I know about it, and I read that on the BFF, posted by Bill. So the fact is, he knows more (from Kit) than I do.
And as far as the Elbe tracks go, don't expect an admission from me any time soon!
Sorry about that. RayG's timeline kind of puts it all into perspective in a way that is hard to dispute. It does appear that people were convinced the tracks were real. A buddy of mine keeps telling me that it's pretty strange that the only thing that has convinced them that the tracks were not authentic was an IP address, and that if they base authenticity on IP addresses, they don't have a lot of science behind their analyses. Worse tracks are considered real only because they can't figure out who made them, or don't have a viable suspect, or worse yet, because they know who made them and they are well known bigfooters, so they'd never be exposed as fake?
And even if it comes down to the BFF staff believing that they have sufficient evidence to ban me, they don't. They don't have evidence of my involvement at all. They can't possibly. I can say that with complete confidence. Regardless of what Daniel Perez has written, or anyone else has said on the BFF or other blogs, all they can do is try to fill in the massive blanks they have, as creatively as possible. They aren't being creative enough.
Let's say that their IP address theory was even close enough to match it to my house, which it isn't. But say it was. Even so, I have a sort of party house, where people come and go all the time. Some are hard wired bigfoot believers, and some are hard wired skeptics. Some have no involvement with bigfoot at all. Like I said, people come and go here a lot, and so I have very little control over what people do on the internet. I got a warning at one point from our provider, saying they had evidence of some particular movie being downloaded against copyright. Whoa, who was that? I had to put out the warning, no downloading movies! So, regardless of what anyone thinks they have, they don't have my fingerprints on anything. They might smell my cologne, but mine is not the only one in the air here.
