• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

2 questions re 1120 'Missing bodies' from WTC 1&2 & media complicity in mass murder

Spanx said:
How large should the "chunks of concrete" have been ?
Click to expand...

I suppose about as large, relative to its mass and composition, as the chunks of upholstered chairs, couches, file cabinets, metal piping, sinks, toilets, marble slabs, heavy plastics, large oak desks, bronze sculptures and carpeting that we also don't see.

Why do you ask? Have you got pictures?
 
DGM said:
I can't believe you're falling for this. :o
Click to expand...

I'm not falling for it, I'd like ergo to tell me what size the pieces should be when you drop a slab of concrete.

There must be a set size that they should be ? At least in truther world ;)
 
Spanx said:
I'm not falling for it, I'd like ergo to tell me what size the pieces should be when you drop a slab of concrete.

There must be a set size that they should be ? At least in truther world ;)
Click to expand...
That actually is falling for it. It has nothing to do with anything and allows him to carry on. ;)
 
ergo said:
I suppose about as large, relative to its mass and composition, as the chunks of upholstered chairs, couches, file cabinets, metal piping, sinks, toilets, marble slabs, heavy plastics, large oak desks, bronze sculptures and carpeting that we also don't see.

Why do you ask? Have you got pictures?
Click to expand...

Is there any possibility that we don't see any of this stuff because maybe, just maybe, thousands upon thousands of tons of debris fell from a massive height into a hole in the ground and crushed it all up?
 
ergo said:
No, actually. The absence of broken concrete floors or even sizable chunks (i.e., larger than fist size) in the debris pile suggests that most of the concrete was pulverized. Are you trying to rebunk something that has been common knowledge since the very event?

Many comments at the time noted the absence of large chunks of concrete, such as this article from Waste Age in November of that year:

Most of the concrete from the WTC site was pulverized into dust in the Sept. 11 attacks.

If you have evidence to the contrary, by all means share it. You've only had about 11 years to do so. :boggled:
Click to expand...

With a Google image search on "9/11 debris pile", it took me about 30 seconds to find a picture with big chunks of concrete in it.

I wonder how long it took ergo to find his cherry-picked quote from a waste management site.
 
Last edited:
CORed said:
Rockslide. Avalanche.

Personal anecdote. Twenty-five years ago or so I was backpacking in the Grand Canyon (Nankoweap trail). While lying in my sleeping bag early the second morning of the trip, I heard the sound of a rockslide somewhere not too far away. Later that same morning, where the trail crossed some rockslide debris, I saw a lot of small pieces of wood that looked very freshly broken (no weathering). I'm pretty sure that these pieces of wood had been living pinyon pine or juniper trees earlier that morning. Had I gotten up earlier that day, I might well have suffered the same fate as those trees. No explosives. Just gravity.
Click to expand...

Check out what happened when a large section of the wall of the Madison River Canyon collapsed in the 1959 Yellowstone earthquake. Just gravity and mass. There's a book: "The Night the Mountain Fell".
 
LSSBB said:
Probably quicker that that because CT sites clog up all the Google results.
Click to expand...

The quote wasn't on a CT site (thought he may well have found it through one). It was from an article on a waste management site about the cleanup of the 9/11 scene. Of course, he may well have initially found it through some CT site. It's just the sort of out of context, probably erroneous quote to which CT's love to attach way too much significance.
 
Redwood said:
Check out what happened when a large section of the wall of the Madison River Canyon collapsed in the 1959 Yellowstone earthquake. Just gravity and mass. There's a book: "The Night the Mountain Fell".
Click to expand...

I'm familiar with that one. I visited the site on a Yellowstone trip when I was a kid, and read the book. IIRC, there were 20 some victims whose bodies were never recovered, buried way too deep under the landslide. I've been to Yellowstone several times since, but haven't visited that site (which is 20 or 30 miles outside the park).
 
CORed said:
With a Google image search on "9/11 debris pile", it took me about 30 seconds to find a picture with big chunks of concrete in it.
Click to expand...

And...? Are you going to share this one image you found, or is it a secret?
 
ergo said:
And...? Are you going to share this one image you found, or is it a secret?
Click to expand...

How are these? There's plenty more, if you need them.
 

Attachments

  • WTC Concrete Rubble.jpg
    WTC Concrete Rubble.jpg
    80.2 KB · Views: 6
  • WTC Concrete Rubble 3.jpg
    WTC Concrete Rubble 3.jpg
    66 KB · Views: 7
ergo said:
Sure. And can you get some larger photos?

Also, Redwood, how thick were the concrete floor slabs?
Click to expand...
4 inches. Great research. Does 911 truth prohibit research?

Have you figured out how many joules it took to crush some of the concrete?
Did you know most the dust is wallboard, ceiling tiles, fire proofing, insulation?
How many joules do you need to destroy a human body? The topic,can you do the math?
 
Originally Posted by Redwood
How are these? There's plenty more, if you need them.
Click to expand...


ergo said:
Sure. And can you get some larger photos?

Also, Redwood, how thick were the concrete floor slabs?
Click to expand...

Here's more. Still hanging onto the rebar. Still need more?

Slabs were 4" thick max, thinner at the ribs in the floor pans. You should know that by now.

If you want larger photos, I suggest you contact Steve Spak. You'll probably have to pay.
 

Attachments

  • Bent 9-11 steel and concrete rubble.jpg
    Bent 9-11 steel and concrete rubble.jpg
    91.4 KB · Views: 4
  • Concrete and Ladder.jpg
    Concrete and Ladder.jpg
    165.4 KB · Views: 5
Redwood said:
Slabs were 4" thick max, thinner at the ribs in the floor pans. You should know that by now. .
Click to expand...

I do know that. I wasn't sure you did. :)

In your first pictures, what would you estimate is the thickness of those alleged concrete chunks?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom