Julian Assange: rapist or not?

Status
Not open for further replies.
What an absolutely pointless page or two this has been. I asked a simple question, no one answers it. People just claim it's been answered (where?) or attack me (holocaust denial, 9/11 truther!) or try to twist my words to make funnies.

Really good form, guys and gals.
 
Great form eh? Anyone with half a brain supports Assange? The vast majority of the world supports him? Hilarious babble. Why would you expect anyone to take you seriously when you talk like that? For one it's a clear sign of pluralistic ignorance when you look at the polls of support (internet polls don't count). You're going down that road which makes us all wretch, "You're either a sheep or a shill if you don't accept our conspiracy theory."

I've heard enough of that type of crap from CTs "anyone with half a brain" and "the world knows" to last me a lifetime.
 
Zeuzzz said:
What an absolutely pointless page or two this has been. I asked a simple question, no one answers it. People just claim it's been answered (where?) or attack me (holocaust denial, 9/11 truther!) or try to twist my words to make funnies.

Really good form, guys and gals.
Click to expand...

Please explain the relevance of your questions. Not only have they already been answered several times, but what do the names of the accusers have to do with anything? Too American sounding or something?
 
Important news not yet mentioned: The Australian government has finally lashed out at Assange through it's Foreign Minister

"to suggest that the Swedes are after him as a CIA conspiracy to get him to Stockholm and allowing him to be bundled off to Langley, Virginia is sheer fantasy,"
...
Carr said that Assange would be safer in Sweden than the UK, as the Swedes say that they will 'never extradite someone on a matter to related to military or intelligence'

http://in.news.yahoo.com/oz-foreign...ange-extradition-us-conspiracy-102238796.html
Click to expand...
This came after the revelation that

Foreign Minister Bob Carr has walked away from a written undertaking to raise the case of Julian Assange in discussions with Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt next week.

Senator Carr's apparent decision to abandon consular advocacy for Mr Assange comes after the WikiLeaks publisher confirmed his plans to run as a Victorian Senate candidate in the September federal election.

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/polit...ssange-case-20130222-2ev7p.html#ixzz2MLeshN2v
Click to expand...

I'd bet money that the approval rating for Assange worldwide has gone down quite a bit worldwide. The Gibney doc, the Khan betrayal, the Aussie feds dumping him.... if we could just get some reputable polls showing just how much of the global public has seen the ugly side as well, we'd be able to be quite sure that the indefatigable narcissist was taking an internal bruising.

At this stage in the cult, a redemption fantasy usually gets invented, an apocalyptic vision where the leader becomes central to the fate of the entire world, specifically your fate. Instead of don't believe in me and you'll go to hell, it will be something like, if you don't petition the world to go along with my vision and redeem me the entire world will fall into the hands of the evil secret-keepers who want to enslave you.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure that, if Assange does end up in the Swedish criminal justice system- and is not secreted into the US for political prosecution, he and his slobbering sychophants will claim that he avoided that dreadful fate because of all the ruckus they raised.
 
trustbutverify said:
I'm sure that, if Assange does end up in the Swedish criminal justice system- and is not secreted into the US for political prosecution, he and his slobbering sychophants will claim that he avoided that dreadful fate because of all the ruckus they raised.
Click to expand...

1. Step one - support a vile greasy little rapist based on warm fuzzy feelings from some shoddy whistle-blowing he once did.

2. Step two - ?

3. Step three - PROFIT!
 
BenBurch said:
1. Step one - support a vile greasy little rapist based on warm fuzzy feelings from some shoddy whistle-blowing he once did.

2. Step two - ?

3. Step three - PROFIT!
Click to expand...


What does this even mean?

You still have not answered my question by the way.
 
Our opinions on what Assange's accusers names are?
That doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
 
Seconded, I think the article I referred to (and it's companion "legal myths") make an excellent case that Assange has a case to answer and should stand trial. My opinion is that his evasion of said trial strongly suggests guilt but other facts may come to light in the course of the trial that clear him. That's why we have courts of law and appeals processes etc. And you can be sure this trial will be watched.
 
So nice to see everyone paying attention to the prurient details of an individuals sex life but not to the implications entailed by the information leaked by wiki Leaks. Don't people care anymore when they are being systematically and consistently lied to? There was a time when wiki Leaks would have been mainstream news in the USA. If you ask me the real injustice is the rape of the objective journalism everywhere. The Soviet Union may have lost the cold war but Pravda lives on
 
Wildling said:
So nice to see everyone paying attention to the prurient details of an individuals sex life but not to the implications entailed by the information leaked by wiki Leaks. Don't people care anymore when they are being systematically and consistently lied to? There was a time when wiki Leaks would have been mainstream news in the USA. If you ask me the real injustice is the rape of the objective journalism everywhere. The Soviet Union may have lost the cold war but Pravda lives on
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, you want the "Rant on about how The Man is keeping you down" thread.
This thread is about Julian Assange and his legal woes with the Swedish government, which, of necessity, involves discussing allegations of sexual misconduct.
 
Wildling said:
So nice to see everyone paying attention to the prurient details of an individuals sex life but not to the implications entailed by the information leaked by wiki Leaks. Don't people care anymore when they are being systematically and consistently lied to? There was a time when wiki Leaks would have been mainstream news in the USA. If you ask me the real injustice is the rape of the objective journalism everywhere. The Soviet Union may have lost the cold war but Pravda lives on
Click to expand...

So in a thread about the Assange sexual abuse case, you want people to stop talking about the Assange sexual abuse case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom