Merged Apollo "hoax" discussion - continuation thread

[Dcdrac]

LRO Photos of the Apollo landing sites

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/revisited/

 

[JayUtah]

Nice summary Jay, but you forgot the flag planting.

The flag wasn't real, it was made of nylon.

 

[ehcks]

The flag wasn't real, it was made of nylon.

Nylon's fake? But my socks are 1% nylon. Oh noes, my socks are 1% fake!

 

[threadworm]

Nylon's fake? But my socks are 1% nylon. Oh noes, my socks are 1% fake!

That would be the hole in the toe.

 

[twinstead]

LRO Photos of the Apollo landing sites

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/apollo/revisited/

And that's just the beginning; when the sites are revisited by boots on the ground and probably made into national monuments moon hoaxers will have to add many more levels of complexity to the hoax when they explain how that stuff got up there.

 

[Dcdrac]

And that's just the beginning; when the sites are revisited by boots on the ground and probably made into national monuments moon hoaxers will have to add many more levels of complexity to the hoax when they explain how that stuff got up there.

yes construction crews sent up in rockets to make fake landing sites.....ooops that means we can land a human on the moon....tum te tum

 

[twinstead]

yes construction crews sent up in rockets to make fake landing sites.....ooops that means we can land a human on the moon....tum te tum

I can hear them now: "of course we eventually developed the technology to go to the moon, just not when we say we did. They secretly ferried those parts up there in the 80's and 90's to prepare for this day".

 

[BazBear]

I can hear them now: "of course we eventually developed the technology to go to the moon, just not when we say we did. They secretly ferried those parts up there in the 80's and 90's to prepare for this day".

<HB> Of course. Many STS missions were to get the components for these missions into LEO. We know the Soviets/Russians have been in on the hoax since the 60's, therefore we have to assume the money the US gov't gave the Russians for their space program, after the fall of the SU, was payment for their help with assembling the lunar transfer and landing ships on orbit (using Mir, and later ISS, for a base) and for continued cooperation with the coverup. Many of the ISS "construction deliveries" were used to get up the rest of hardware needed to make the supposed Apollo landing sites look authentic, just in time for LRO to image them. </HB>

How am I doing? Is this too "logical" for an HB rant?

 

[twinstead]

How am I doing? Is this too "logical" for an HB rant?

You need a few words in all caps and some more exclamation points, but you're getting there

 

[mooncakes123]

these explanations are hilarious ........ so your telling me you "actually" saw them walk on the moon very vitoriouz

 

[TheRedWorm]

Well, anyone with sufficient equipment could track the lander touching down on the moon.

 

[trebor]

these explanations are hilarious ........

The problem is that your 'question' was so broad and aimless as to be nonsensical.

If you are series about getting information then perhaps you should ask a better question.
If you have some point to make perhaps you should get to it.

 

[Hans]

these explanations are hilarious ........ so your telling me you "actually" saw them walk on the moon very vitoriouz

Troll

 

[JayUtah]

Apollo "hoax" discussion / Lick observatory laser saga Part II

these explanations are hilarious ........ so your telling me you "actually" saw them walk on the moon very vitoriouz

Yeah, troll

 

[abaddon]

these explanations are hilarious ........ so your telling me you "actually" saw them walk on the moon very vitoriouz

Let me get this straight. No answers were provided for a question you did not ask. Hilarious indeed.

 

[mooncakes123]

k

.......why haven't we been to the moon since 1972........ with all the technology that we have today.

 

[Ranb]

.......why haven't we been to the moon since 1972........ with all the technology that we have today.

Because no one is willing to pay for it. I'm one of those who feel returning astronauts to the moon is a waste of money. If you want to write the check to make it happen, then by all means do it.

Ranb

 

[John Jones]

.......why haven't we been to the moon since 1972........ with all the technology that we have today.

We have - with unmanned probes. They're lots cheaper.

 

[Kid Eager]

.......why haven't we been to the moon since 1972........ with all the technology that we have today.

Come on, at least put some effort into it!

 

[beachnut]

Apollo happened!!!!

Yes, in the summer of 69 the USA landed 2 men on the moon.
Moon landing deniers have fantasy, skip critical thinking. They can't do orbital mechanics.

ok.....well then explain to me how it happened because I don't think it did

Since you deny it happened, you will not comprehend how it was done, you don't to EOM and orbital mechanics.
First you have to have lots of math, tons. You have to love math and go all the way. Have you taken graduate level math? While you are taking math, you need to take physics, lots of physics. Next you have to do the equations of motions, and work on orbital mechanics. The EOM will fill a large class room filled with caulk boards (remember the USA did this in the 60, before that silly keyboard, or tablet you are working on and deny the moon landing were invented). Did you take physics, and math, can you formulate the EOM, or do differential equations?
I have no idea why you believe your computer or tablet is real, you can't explain how the chips are made, are you sure they are real?

Do you know how to build big rocket engines?

Moon landing deniers don't do science.
Astronomers tracked Apollo missions, why can't you (not born yet). How do you fall for the failed hoax?
http://www.astr.ua.edu/keel/space/apollo.html
Do you understand astronomy?

these explanations are hilarious ........ so your telling me you "actually" saw them walk on the moon very vitoriouz

LOL, explain in detail how the Internet works, and how the chips in your computer are made. They can't be real, can they? Who makes the chips for you? Can you make computer chips? Anything technical?

If you don't understand orbital mechanics, then you will be unarmed to prove the moon landings did not take place.
I did see men walk on the moon, guess deniers don't understand information theory, another college thing. They had to invent ways to do communication to ensure it worked, the comm part. Do you have any science or engineering background?

I saw them walk on the moon live. Do you understand electromagnetic waves, and communications? If not you will not comprehend or be able to prove your claim, your denial of reality. Good luck.

.......why haven't we been to the moon since 1972........ with all the technology that we have today.

Can you do the equations, the orbital mechanics to go to the Moon? Are you prepared to do the hard stuff? Technology? You don't know how we got to the moon in the 60s, and you think you can harness technology today to anything; the best you come up with is denying reality.

Already best answer is $$$. As you gain maturity you will figure out you can only do so much - but gee whiz, run for president and inspire us to go back, or do better.

A young president did that in the 60s.
http://er.jsc.nasa.gov/seh/ricetalk.htm
http://history.nasa.gov/moondec.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYb_mhiE-qU

A president inspired a nation to go to the Moon, what inspired you to deny reality?