• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Latest Dreck from Kevin Barrett

Redwood

Graduate Poster
Redwood
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
1,557
Look what the cat dragged in:


Supreme Court Slams Door in 9/11 Widow’s Face
Posted: February 21, 2013 in Uncategorized
Tags: 9/11 lawsuit, dancing Jews

By Dr. Kevin Barrett
Click to expand...

http://extremeprejudiceusa.wordpress.com/2013/02/21/supreme-court-slams-door-in-911-widows-face/

I know that Barrett and Bollyn are Holocaust Deniers and Bollyn is a neo-fascist who was too crazy for his colleagues at "American Free Press", but I don't about the case itself. Perhaps someone has some background.
 
Redwood said:
Look what the cat dragged in:

http://extremeprejudiceusa.wordpress.com/2013/02/21/supreme-court-slams-door-in-911-widows-face/

I know that Barrett and Bollyn are Holocaust Deniers and Bollyn is a neo-fascist who was too crazy for his colleagues at "American Free Press", but I don't about the case itself. Perhaps someone has some background.
Click to expand...
Barrett might be a neoNAZI?

Background? Barrett is nuts on 911, and hates the USA. Maybe he is upset he did not lock in 5 percent dividends with DUK or WM.
After eleven years, two separate lawsuits, and an unbelievable series of encounters with corrupt lawyers and Israeli-American judges, Ellen Mariani has finally heard from the United States Supreme Court. And the Supreme Court’s message is loud and clear: There will be no truth, and no justice, concerning 9/11… at least not in the US court system.
Click to expand...

The message Barrett missed? There will be no woo on 911 taken seriously.
 
Kevin Barrett is repulsive. I cannot even read two sentences of his prejudiced dribble.
 
Barrett and Bollyn are scum. I'm trying to get info about Mariani's lawsuit, but google searches get buried in 9-11 conspiracist links.

It seems that poor Mrs. Mariani doesn't know who her real friends are, and is being exploited by the usual sleazy characters. This really angers me. I'd like to find out more about this Vince Gillespie.
 
Last edited:
Redwood said:
Barrett and Bollyn are scum. I'm trying to get info about Mariani's lawsuit, but google searches get buried in 9-11 conspiracist links.

It seems that poor Mrs. Mariani doesn't know who her real friends are, and is being exploited by the usual sleazy characters. This really angers me. I'd like to find out more about this Vince Gillespie.
Click to expand...

Any luck? I tried removing CT cesspools from the search results and it's like when Bugs Bunny cut the mad scientist's monster's hair. Turned out he was all hair.

ETA: Turns out that wan't Bugs Bunny. Now I have to go dig it up... maybe that was Cousin Itt
 
Last edited:
LSSBB said:
Any luck? I tried removing CT cesspools from the search results and it's like when Bugs Bunny cut the mad scientist's monster's hair. Turned out he was all hair.
Click to expand...

Tell me about it. Just try to look up any legitimate information about the Kennedy assassination without wading through tons of manure.
 
Originally Posted by Redwood
Barrett and Bollyn are scum. I'm trying to get info about Mariani's lawsuit, but google searches get buried in 9-11 conspiracist links.

It seems that poor Mrs. Mariani doesn't know who her real friends are, and is being exploited by the usual sleazy characters. This really angers me. I'd like to find out more about this Vince Gillespie.
Click to expand...


LSSBB said:
Any luck? I tried removing CT cesspools from the search results and it's like when Bugs Bunny cut the mad scientist's monster's hair. Turned out he was all hair.

ETA: Turns out that wan't Bugs Bunny. Now I have to go dig it up... maybe that was Cousin Itt
Click to expand...

It's like searching for gold coins at the bottom of a septic tank.
 
LSSBB said:
Any luck? I tried removing CT cesspools from the search results and it's like when Bugs Bunny cut the mad scientist's monster's hair. Turned out he was all hair.

ETA: Turns out that wan't Bugs Bunny. Now I have to go dig it up... maybe that was Cousin Itt
Click to expand...

Now you have me wondering. I do remember a Bugs Bunny episode that there was a bad 'guy' that was all hair.

This might be the best part of this thread. Finding this episode. :p

How 'politically incorrect" is this?

(not the one we're looking for)
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
The latest:

New studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.
Click to expand...

http://therebel.org/resistance/6660...theorists-sane-government-dupes-crazy-hostile

Needless to say, that's not what the article headline says, and Barrett doesn't link to it, but you can see it here.

You can download the article at the link. Here's the headline to the abstract:

“What about building 7?” A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories
Click to expand...

I haven't had a chance to read the article yet.
 
I read the article. Barrett completely misrepresents it.

The main point of the article is that conspiracists spend more time attacking the "official theory" rather than provide one of their own.

Conventionalists (the term used in the article) spend more time attacking the arguments of the conspiracists than expounding upon the conventional explanation. Pariunt montes, nascitur mus ridiculus.
 
Redwood said:
I read the article. Barrett completely misrepresents it.

The main point of the article is that conspiracists spend more time attacking the "official theory" rather than provide one of their own.

Conventionalists (the term used in the article) spend more time attacking the arguments of the conspiracists than expounding upon the conventional explanation. Pariunt montes, nascitur mus ridiculus.
Click to expand...

Barrett is an idiot. The study was done of comments on news articles. Barrett seems to imply there are more who are conspiracy nuts, than those who think the nuts are nuts. lol

Is Barrett voting on sanity by the numbers of nuts are more than the number of sane? Making nuts sane, and the sane are nuts?
 
Barrett being a bias hypocrite and making up stories again? Who'd have thought..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom