• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Believer vs. Believer

Does capitalizing Aphrodite change the validity of assuming a female love-goddes with that nomenclature exists?
Aphrodite didn't define itself with proper relevance to the opposites. So how could you ask such a senseless question?
 
More important, does it make Odin more assumable if you capitalize it?:rolleyes:
Your incapability of incorporating Revelation 22:13, which I specifically mentioned, into the works is a sign of you being totally unprepared for following arguments made of formal logic. Such a deficiency is the main "pillar" of strong atheism.
 
Quote:
God defines himself as
I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.

No, a human being wrote that.
What do you relate the negative to? Did I say "God defined himself by writing that...?"

This is another example of the contradictory nature of positive atheism that God likes to make fun of.

Btw, that definition couldn't be John's own idea, because the odds against it are just too big.
 
Your incapability of incorporating Revelation 22:13, which I specifically mentioned, into the works is a sign of you being totally unprepared for following arguments made of formal logic. Such a deficiency is the main "pillar" of strong atheism.

But as far as Odin is concerned, the Christian bible is just so much bloviating by an upstart false religion. Why are you so unprepared to discuss Odin intelligently? Are you actually atheistic towards Odin? I see what you meant when you were denigrating atheists, you were referring to yourself.
 
Quote:
God defines himself as
I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.


What do you relate the negative to? Did I say "God defined himself by writing that...?"

This is another example of the contradictory nature of positive atheism that God likes to make fun of.
No, god(s) don't make fun of anyone, people do. You might want to actually think about it.

Btw, that definition couldn't be John's own idea, because the odds against it are just too big.
So do you understand that words attributed to made up god(s) are actually the words of the people who make them up? If not, why not?
 
Seeing as how god doesn't exist I feel I can write the word in any way I choose.
Of course you can. I mean, you looked inside the closet, under your bed... No God. Why would you be different from those people who write email to their friends that they will be late, because they can't find their Car Keys.

You can chose any illogical way to express yourself. But you can't force anyone to pay attention to your ways and means. That's why there is atheism and theism.
 
No, god(s) don't make fun of anyone, people do. You might want to actually think about it.
Really? That's mighty observant of someone who asserts the hard way that deities don't exist. I mean, is there any end to the procession of the contradictions that positive atheism can herd together?
So do you understand that words attributed to made up god(s) are actually the words of the people who make them up? If not, why not?
I told you didn't I?
Btw, that definition couldn't be John's own idea, because the odds against it are just too big.
 
Epix, what is "inherited theism?" Searching for the phrase doesn't reveal any specific meaning, other than the religion of one's parents. What does the phrase mean to you? Please give me an example or two of inherited theism, and an example or two of theism that is not inherited (and that therefore it appears you're in favor of).

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
Of course you can.I mean, you looked inside the closet, under your bed... No God. Why would you be different from those people who write email to their friends that they will be late, because they can't find their Car Keys.

You can chose any illogical way to express yourself. But you can't force anyone to pay attention to your ways and means. That's why there is atheism and theism.

I've done far more searching than that, Your condescension is noted however.

It's the religious that dogmatically force their world views on others not I.

The reason for atheism is simply the denial of the claims that god's exist.

And lastly pay attention to what?
 
Really? That's mighty observant of someone who asserts the hard way that deities don't exist. I mean, is there any end to the procession of the contradictions that positive atheism can herd together?

I told you didn't I?

What? It's easy to know that all gods are inventions of mankind. How can there be any contradiction in not believing in imaginary beings? You really must try and learn that your misguided opinions are not facts. Could you explain, in English please, what this thread is about?
 
Epix, can you please state what your thread is about in one complete sentence?

The thread seems interesting, buyt I cannot make heads, or tails of it.
 
Really? That's mighty observant of someone who asserts the hard way that deities don't exist. I mean, is there any end to the procession of the contradictions that positive atheism can herd together?
There seems to be no end to the contradictions that all the man made religions and made up gods can get up to. Is that what you meant?

I told you didn't I?
You just haven't told me which made up god(s) you subscribe to and which you are atheistic about. Will you be honest enough to do so?
 
Having read several entire books on the subject of Godel's Incompleteness Theorem...
If you read it, you noticed the idea that no one thought of before: the assigning of numbers to logical formulas. Of course, there was a number assignment done to words before, such as the common binary substitute,

absence = 1
presence = 0

closed = 1
opened = 0

or any opposites such as those below:

I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.
Revelation

But GODel, (I can also mutilate other personal nouns when I feel like it) came with his own numbering system (a numerology for the lay) that involved natural numbers that he assigned to various logical formulas. It was like the Bible. There was no system of numbering and then came the Geneva Bible, and you can now assign numbers to the opposites

I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.
Revelation 22:13

So what?

Well, remember once again who was GODel.

A typical character of a genius is that it extends beyond his period. Kurt Godel was not an exception. His letters to his mother show his tendency to search for explanations of seemingly random coincidences.
http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/82/1/012008
 
If you read it, you noticed the idea that no one thought of before: the assigning of numbers to logical formulas. Of course, there was a number assignment done to words before, such as the common binary substitute,

absence = 1
presence = 0

closed = 1
opened = 0

or any opposites such as those below:

I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.
Revelation

But GODel, (I can also mutilate other personal nouns when I feel like it) came with his own numbering system (a numerology for the lay) that involved natural numbers that he assigned to various logical formulas. It was like the Bible. There was no system of numbering and then came the Geneva Bible, and you can now assign numbers to the opposites

I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.
Revelation 22:13

So what?

Well, remember once again who was GODel.


http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/82/1/012008

So that's a no to making sense then?
 
Your incapability of incorporating Revelation 22:13, which I specifically mentioned, into the works is a sign of you being totally unprepared for following arguments made of formal logic. Such a deficiency is the main "pillar" of strong atheism.

Do you feel that your inability to form coherent sentences and your total lack of logic stems from your atheism about Odin? Or is it more because of Athena? Which of your other deficiencies can you trace directly to your atheism about various God(s) and which ones in particular?
 

Back
Top Bottom