• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Youtube truther comments

This thread is useless. It is a well known fact that youtube is a nest of disinformation agents.
Most truthers on youtube are only posing as truthers.
 
Starving for Truth said:
In fact, here exposedeceivers (webmaster of takeourworldback.com), gets himself exposed as a disinfo agent:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cddIgb1nGJ8
Click to expand...

What I find interesting is, the amount of likes on this link is not far off the same as the link for ae911 in post one.

Could this be an indication to the amount of truthers world wide ?

I took this comment from the ae911 board yesterday.

HurburBurbur
This video had half a million views in only about a month when released well over a year ago, then Youtube stopped showing the true numbers. That's how scared those f****** are. Send this video link to your friends. It's one of the best eye-openers out there.

That is not far off 17000 per day in the first month:D the likes and views are listed below, I guess they will be lucky to get 100 views a day bearing in mind the view counts are going up due to jrefers reading the comments.

986021 views
9691 likes
 
Apparently femr2 is a moon-landing denier, here's a comment he left on a Alex Jones video about Buzz Aldrin:

femr2 said:
Should have pressed him on the radiation belt Alex. One step at a time. Yes, he's a dangerous figure to 'attack', but to get the simplwe answers, you have to repeat the simple questions over and over again...

Why did the astronauts not fry going through the radiation belt...?

If there is a simple answer, let's hear it...
Click to expand...

ROFL

http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=BAwTxwhfHq0&page=1
 
LSSBB said:
They applied Savitzky-Golay smoothing to the radiation. :D
Click to expand...

What's also funny is, why would femr want the space travel expert ALEX JONES to ask Buzz Aldrin about the "physical impossibility" of penetrating the radiation belt?!

Hello-oo, McFly!! Anybody home??
 
I got a gem today. A comment on my upload of of BBC Conspiracy Road Trip 9/11. Referring to the thermite test where the guy piles the thermite on top of a beam and lights it;

********. These "experts" are hired to confuse the situation. EXAMPLE With Thermite - LESS IS MORE. What you saw was a MOUND of thermite. It burned through itself. When using thermite, you "coat the steel", like you would if you were using paint. You basically Paint the Thermite on IN LIQUID FORM, it will dry, and then you ignite it. So, if you were putting thermite on the side of a steel frame, would it be in a "mound". NO.
Click to expand...

To which I replied, and pointed out, that thermite 'burning through itself' is how thermite us supposed to work, and that his idea of 'more is less' is absolutely ridiculous. To which he responded...

LOL - you don't throw it on steel in a MOUND like an anthill. If you put on a thin layer, more thermite can react with the oxygen in the air (a mound will have less outside surface area in contact with the air). With a thinner layer, all of the thermite reacts with the air. In a mound, only the stuff on top is truly activated, and thus uses a lot of it's energy to burn through the "mound". Now, YOU go learn something.
Click to expand...

Apparently thermite needs air to work. I find it incredible this guy claims (in other comments) that he's 'well researched' and tells everyone else they need to learn their facts, and yet he doesn't even know the basics of how his 'thermite' actually functions.. Can youtube truthers getting any more retarded?
 
cjnewson88 said:
I got a gem today. A comment on my upload of of BBC Conspiracy Road Trip 9/11. Referring to the thermite test where the guy piles the thermite on top of a beam and lights it;



To which I replied, and pointed out, that thermite 'burning through itself' is how thermite us supposed to work, and that his idea of 'more is less' is absolutely ridiculous. To which he responded...



Apparently thermite needs air to work. I find it incredible this guy claims (in other comments) that he's 'well researched' and tells everyone else they need to learn their facts, and yet he doesn't even know the basics of how his 'thermite' actually functions.. Can youtube truthers getting any more retarded?
Click to expand...


LMAO :D

Linky?
 
cjnewson88 said:
Apparently thermite needs air to work. I find it incredible this guy claims (in other comments) that he's 'well researched' and tells everyone else they need to learn their facts, and yet he doesn't even know the basics of how his 'thermite' actually functions.. Can youtube truthers [get] any more retarded?
Click to expand...

They sure can! It's like prime numbers... No matter how large, there's an infinite supply of even larger.
 
cjnewson88 said:
I got a gem today. A comment on my upload of of BBC Conspiracy Road Trip 9/11. Referring to the thermite test where the guy piles the thermite on top of a beam and lights it;



To which I replied, and pointed out, that thermite 'burning through itself' is how thermite us supposed to work, and that his idea of 'more is less' is absolutely ridiculous. To which he responded...



Apparently thermite needs air to work. I find it incredible this guy claims (in other comments) that he's 'well researched' and tells everyone else they need to learn their facts, and yet he doesn't even know the basics of how his 'thermite' actually functions.. Can youtube truthers getting any more retarded?
Click to expand...

My only experience with thermite, was in the army with a few thermite grenades... its pretty much just a heap.
 
Chris Sarns - truther turned hoaxer

I don't know if Chris Sarns still posts here, but now that 9/11 truth is currently overshadowed by the Newtown shooting conspiracies, he's quite busy on youtube researching the "Sandy Hook conspiracy".

If you google keywords like "chrissarns sandy hook hoax site:youtube.com" , or "chrissarns newtown conspiracy proof site:youtube.com", there'll be dozens of results. Of course, he's just "asking questions"...:D

Youtube is like a digital fingerprint of stupidity. Most truthers have a youtube account, since it's the information central.

Notice his comment on a video titled the "The Sandy Hoax continues.."
chrissarns 1 month ago said:
Excellent catch. Can you make a slow [with stops] pan down so we can see everything clearly please? This is fine for the choir but it's the "skeptics" that need to be convinced. The shorter and clearer the video evidence, the better. Less is more.

Thank you
Click to expand...

:homersimp
 
Last edited:
He's Lying.

Painting on NANO-thermite is the preferred method. If it's wet, then he's right, once it dries, it will cut through the metal like butter. This thermite mixture used is not NANO-thermite, it's a mixture like what you could make in your garage. NANO-THERMITE acts on a molecular level. It would be interesting to see what the screening process was to pick who went on this show (same goes for how they picked their "experts").
Click to expand...
Yeah man, it's a molecular what you can make - in your garage! Chemistry? Who needs chemistry?
 
Oystein said:
They YT comment sections are socially dysfunctional areas. Hit and run, people hiding behind anonymous screen names, no moderation whatsoever, all-out insultfests.

The total lack of social control and moderation, along with the limit to 255 characters and a prohibition on URLs, ensure that extreme behaviour emerges, which is probably in no way representative of anything in the real world - not even of the actual participants.
Click to expand...

Yes. The limit on comment length in particular makes it difficult to make anything remotely resembling a rational argument. On those occasions when I am unable to resist the temptation to respond to some piece of stupidity or other, I suspect that I frequently end up looking just as dumb as the truthers, chemtrailers or racists that I respond to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom