Merged No Planer calls for scientific study / Missiles of 9/11

[tsig]

It's not a question of speed, the feather is not big enough to cut a car in half. It would have to be either a very small car or a very large feather.

Either way, the answer would be: Pretty durn fast.

All we have to do is coat that feather in sol-gel nano thermite and that car is sliced and diced.

 

[tsig]

Any idea how fast a feather would need to travel to cut a car in half?

.

The air speed velocity of an unladen swallow.

 

[LSSBB]

Funding, of course is where the project will fail. In the unlikely event that this guy isn't blowing smoke from the get-go, this test is going to cost a lot of money. I don't think the couple of hundred or so remaining truthers are going to be able to find that much under the cushions of the couches in their moms' basements.

All the big truther money is behind Gage. I don't think those Promethean Genesis folks or Hollywood Truthers are no-planers (well, who knows with Charlie Sheen).

 

[yankee451]

But there were planes. They have records right back to the manufacturers.

All the Airports they landed at have flight records, all the Pilots have records of the aircraft in their logbooks. All the service companies that worked on them have records, all the parts suppliers have records.
If there's one thing you can be sure of it is that the Civil Airline industry has comprehensive records of everything that is done to any aircraft and all the parts ever used on them.
So, we know the aircraft existed up until 911.
All the passengers and crew that were on them that day are also missing.

If the aircraft didn't crash as seen on 911, where did they go? Where are all the people?

All of this is very interesting, but the damage indicates something else caused it. The 9/11 Crash Test Project will clear it up for all those who are still confused about all the implications.

 

[TheRedWorm]

All of this is very interesting, but the damage indicates something else caused it. The 9/11 Crash Test Project will clear it up for all those who are still confused about all the implications.

And when it fails, will you admit you were wrong?

 

[LSSBB]

All of this is very interesting, but the damage indicates something else caused it. The 9/11 Crash Test Project will clear it up for all those who are still confused about all the implications.

No, the damage was shaped like the planes that went into the buildings. It indicates therefore that planes went into the buildings.

 

[dafydd]

And when it fails, will you admit you were wrong?

No. he won't. I hope the test goes out live.

 

[Spanx]

All of this is very interesting, but the damage indicates something else caused it. The 9/11 Crash Test Project will clear it up for all those who are still confused about all the implications.

What could make a hole like that ?

http://i.bnet.com/blogs/wtc-plane-c...-620x348.jpg?tag=siu-container;attachment_614

Let us know when your ready and perhaps we could get started.

Perhaps we could start with what plane model hit the building, then we can get some exact measurements rather than your approx measurements.

 

[Ape of Good Hope]

All of this is very interesting, but the damage indicates something else caused it.

Something that you can't provide any evidence of.

The 9/11 Crash Test Project will clear it up for all those who are still confused about all the implications.

No it won't. You'll still insist it was missiles.

 

[TheRedWorm]

No. he won't. I hope the test goes out live.

I doubt he'll ever get the money or materials to do the test in the first place. That's why truther 'models' invariably end up as cardboard boxes or plastic trays or lemons or some ****.

 

[dafydd]

That's why truther 'models' invariably end up as cardboard boxes or plastic trays or lemons or some ****.

How very appropriate for cartoon physics.

 

[CORed]

the other bit of physics he seems quite oblivious to is the fact that the wing isn't flying along all on its lonesome - it's attached quite solidly to a rather weighty tube.

Which makes his proposed rocket sled test worthless (besides 767 wings don't exactly grow on trees and that nobody's going to offer one up to be destroyed without wanting a lot of money in return).

Besides, the question (if there ever was one) of whether a jet airliner moving at sufficient speed would go through the perimeter columns was answered on 9/11/2001, twice. The planes did go through the building walls. The no-planer notion that the entire crash events were somehow faked (videos, eyewitnesses, radar data, holes in the buildings, plane parts and dead plane passengers inside the buildings) is more unbelievable by several orders of magnitude than the notion that the planes did penetrate the buildings.

 

[CORed]

The contents do not add density to said tube. Back to the drawing board for you.

You don't actually know what density is, do you?

Hint: It has a precise mathematical definition.

 

[dafydd]

You don't actually know what density is, do you?

Obviously not. It's back to the factory that makes the drawing boards for yankee451.

 

[DGM]

The air speed velocity of an unladen swallow.

African or European?

 

[beachnut]

Anti-vision, Anti-science fantasy fails

All of this is very interesting, but the damage indicates something else caused it. The 9/11 Crash Test Project will clear it up for all those who are still confused about all the implications.

You mean blind people?
Or people who can't do RADAR because they can't comprehend simple technology, or things like electromagnetic radiation. Got Science?
You got woo.

Visual proof of 175

No missiles. Only flight 175.
Where are the passengers in your fantasy?

You mistake me for someone who cares ...

RADAR proof
http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/foia/9_11/Flight_Path_Study_UA175.pdf

 

[dafydd]

African or European?

With or without a coconut tied to its leg?

 

[Animal]

All of this is very interesting, but the damage indicates something else caused it. The 9/11 Crash Test Project will clear it up for all those who are still confused about all the implications.

That is a lot of money to spend to "unconfuse" a couple hundred troofers.

 

[dafydd]

That is a lot of money to spend to "unconfuse" a couple hundred troofers.

How much do egg cartons and cardboard boxes cost? Anyway, they'd only get confused by something else almost immediately.

 

[CORed]

Is this a fancy way of saying you don't have a leg to stand on?

No. It's a fancy way of saying you don't have a leg to stand on.