Merged No Planer calls for scientific study / Missiles of 9/11

[yankee451]

In case you've missed it:



Yo.

Ask him what that means, yes, or no?

 

[yankee451]

But cj is, as is SUS and many others.



Yes, yes I have. It's rubbish. So what?

What did you think was rubbish?

 

[TJM]

Ask him what that means, yes, or no?

Don't you know?

 

[yankee451]

How about you sus, can the wing cut the car in half?

 

[yankee451]

Don't you know?

no, does that mean he think's it's a distraction from his real meaning or does he mean "no way in h#%^ a jet's wing can cut a car in half at any speed"?

If there is a speed he thinks it IS possible, ask him what that is.

 

[TJM]

What did you think was rubbish?

The entire content. Kudos to your graphics guy though, one of the better illustrated truther pile of **** I've seen in a while.

 

[Sam.I.Am]

I absolutely want you to perform your crash test though.

And don't bother with small scale testing to see if the results are even close to the expected outcome. Specifically don't bother spending any money to buy a case of soda pop, a roll of duct tape, a sledgehammer handle and a 12 lb sledgehammer.

And really don't hit your car (not your neighbors car or your parents car but your own car) on one side repeatedly with the real sledgehammer while recording the dents and then do the same with a makeshift hammer using the handle, duct tape and empty soda cans and then use a few unopened soda cans to simulate your hollow aluminum tube theory.

Go full scale first... totally. Don't forget to document it from start to finish on youtube it to prove all of us wrong.

I. Dare. You.

 

[yankee451]

The entire content. Kudos to your graphics guy though, one of the better illustrated truther pile of **** I've seen in a while.

So you think not only can the wing cut a car in half, it can also cut 37 wood stoves in half too?

You must be a pilot too.

 

[yankee451]

And don't bother with small scale testing to see if the results are even close to the expected outcome. Specifically don't bother spending any money to buy a case of soda pop, a roll of duct tape, a sledgehammer handle and a 12 lb sledgehammer.

And really don't hit your car (not your neighbors car or your parents car but your own car) on one side repeatedly with the real sledgehammer while recording the dents and then do the same with a makeshift hammer using the handle, duct tape and empty soda cans and then use a few unopened soda cans to simulate your hollow aluminum tube theory.

Go full scale first... totally. Don't forget to document it from start to finish on youtube it to prove all of us wrong.

I. Dare. You.

Thank you for your kind words.

The video is an introduction to a peace project - a crash test. It is an experiment the results of which are not yet known because the project has just begun. The entire project will be open to public scrutiny as a condition of its funding. The only people making money will be those who provide services such as building the steel columns and mounting the rocket sleds. All of this will be done open to review and documented as part of the documentary.

Instead of hanging around with your charming friends, you could have watched the video and perused the FAQ.

 

[yankee451]

Every pilot out there, tell me how many cars your jet wing can cut in half?

Wood stoves?

Pelicans?

 

[TJM]

So you think not only can the wing cut a car in half, it can also cut 37 wood stoves in half too?

Not cut in half, but I'd say a it'd probably obliterate the car, your 37 wood stoves and itself if it achieved the velocity observed regarding the 9/11 aircraft.

You must be a pilot too.

Guess again.

 

[Ape of Good Hope]

Every pilot out there, tell me how many cars your jet wing can cut in half?

Wood stoves?

Pelicans?

Hatstand?

Paris?

John Lennon?

Taj Mahal?


Free association trolling may be fun, but it's not providing us with any evidence of your missiles.

At some point we're really going to need to see evidence of missiles.

 

[beachnut]

Video, RADAR, Physics, 451 unable to refute with evidence.

Thank you for your kind words.

The video is an introduction to a peace project - a crash test. It is an experiment the results of which are not yet known because the project has just begun. The entire project will be open to public scrutiny as a condition of its funding. The only people making money will be those who provide services such as building the steel columns and mounting the rocket sleds. All of this will be done open to review and documented as part of the documentary.

Instead of hanging around with your charming friends, you could have watched the video and perused the FAQ.

Your video is filled with lies and nonsense. Feel free to take any of the main points and prove them. Your claim is easy to refute, but you ignore the evidence.

Every pilot out there, tell me how many cars your jet wing can cut in half?

Wood stoves?

Pelicans?

LOL, and you said it first, and these are them; idiotic questions. Smoke screen to cover you when you ignore the evidence.

Is this your best?

No evidence, just BS about BS.

Your old wood stove failed physics. wow

It matches your comments on the MIT paper, nonsense.

http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Chapter-IV-Aircraft-Impact.pdf
No wonder you make up new stupid question, you can't do the physics.

The math shows 767 can break into the WTC, as seen on these videos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGR0Gw4c5M4
Then the RADAR
http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/foia/9_11/Flight_Path_Study_UA175.pdf
Destroys you claim - proves 175 did it.

 

[TJM]

Hatstand?

Paris?

John Lennon?

Taj Mahal?


Free association trolling may be fun, but it's not providing us with any evidence of your missiles.

At some point we're really going to need to see evidence of missiles.

Is this the missile thread?

Damn. I thought it was the other one,

Now I'll have to pry the Cessna wing from my Civic...

 

[abaddon]

What an idiotic video. That's 11 minutes of my life wasted on a load of hogwash that I won't be getting back.

 

[TJM]

Your video is filled with lies and nonsense. Feel free to take any of the main points and prove them. Your claim is easy to refute, but you ignore the evidence.

LOL, and you said it first, and these are them; idiotic questions. Smoke screen to cover you when you ignore the evidence.

Is this your best?

No evidence, just BS about BS.

Your old wood stove failed physics. wow

It matches your comments on the MIT paper, nonsense.

http://yankee451.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Chapter-IV-Aircraft-Impact.pdf
No wonder you make up new stupid question, you can't do the physics.

The math shows 767 can break into the WTC, as seen on these videos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGR0Gw4c5M4
Then the RADAR
http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/foia/9_11/Flight_Path_Study_UA175.pdf
Destroys you claim - proves 175 did it.

Beachy defies ignore.

 

[TJM]

What an idiotic video. That's 11 minutes of my life wasted on a load of hogwash that I won't be getting back.

But if you donate, a no-planer gets his wings (that can't cut through steel, let alone an argument).

 

[Ape of Good Hope]

Is this the missile thread?
Damn. I thought it was the other one,

Now I'll have to pry the Cessna wing from my Civic...

I doubt it matters at this point, his primary goal is to drive traffic to his youtube video and website.

Anything we type is just noise


ETA - over at Icke's, "moving finger" has sussed him:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1061296755&postcount=88

 

[Starving for Truth]

The official videos of the cartoon planes approaching the towers prove that the planes were fake.

The planes can be seen flying with a constant velocity, in other words (dv/dt)=0. If we apply Newton, then we have F=m*(dv/dt)=0! This is physically impossible! The cartoon planes could be seen flying at 500 mph! Clearly a plane moving that fast must have a non-zero force!

And the government and mainstream media want us to believe that the 500 mph "plane" didn't exert ANY force at all at that velocity!?!?

So the fact that the planes pictured in the videos are moving at a constant velocity proves that they didn't move at all, they were fake.

 

[dafydd]

The official videos of the cartoon planes approaching the towers prove that the planes were fake.

The planes can be seen flying with a constant velocity, in other words (dv/dt)=0. If we apply Newton, then we have F=m*(dv/dt)=0! This is physically impossible! The cartoon planes could be seen flying at 500 mph! Clearly a plane moving that fast must have a non-zero force!

And the government and mainstream media want us to believe that the 500 mph "plane" didn't exert ANY force at all at that velocity!?!?

So the fact that the planes pictured in the videos are moving at a constant velocity proves that they didn't move at all, they were fake.

No, no and no yet again. You know nothing about the calculus or physics. A lot of planes fly with a constant velocity. So if you see a plane flying overhead with a constant velocity that means that it isn't moving. Your trolling is entertaining, keep it up.