JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
Robert Prey said:
A hack NYT reporter from the most discredited, biased newspaper in the country presents slanderous hearsay about a dead man who cannot respond nor sue. No need to respond to such an obvious attempt to discredit another anti WC witness I merely point out the fact that his observations of those original pics are consistent with 40 plus medical witnesses, particularly all of the Parkland doctors and the point out his live interview on TMWKK shoiwing a rational man, not a bit senile, who served in the State Dept.and US Information Agency under six Presidents. That would be enough to overcome any cowardly NYT weasel who would attempt to slander a dead man.
Click to expand...


One point at a time or no response from me.
You should know the rules. You invented them.

Hank
 
Last edited:
Tomtomkent said:
Yes they wereauthenticated as being of JFK.
If you ave any objective evdence they contain anything else provide it now.

Otherwise any observations to the contrary are innacurate.,

You are the only one who seems unable to live with this.

By the way you have yet to provide posts where I declare myself victorious or call myself a scholar. Perhaps it would be wise to admit subjective statements are faliable and of limited value.
Click to expand...

Be careful what you post. Someone with Roberts selective quoting skills(?) might do something dishonest like...

Tomtomkent said:
I declare myself victorious ... call myself a scholar.
Click to expand...
;)
 
JayUtah said:
Somehow.
Click to expand...

Boy does Robert suck at making up fake quotes

Robert seems to think no one actually reads the thread or that all previous posts are magically unavailable for viewing

KNOCK, KNOCK Robert we can see what you doing on this thread

lol
 
Originally Posted by Robert Prey View Post
The autopsy x-rays and photos were never authenticated and specifically contrary to the observations of all the Parkland doctors and many others. Live with it.


Tomtomkent said:
Yes they wereauthenticated as being of JFK.
If you ave any objective evdence they contain anything else provide it now.

Otherwise any observations to the contrary are innacurate.,

You are the only one who seems unable to live with this.

By the way you have yet to provide posts where I declare myself victorious or call myself a scholar. Perhaps it would be wise to admit subjective statements are faliable and of limited value.
Click to expand...


* The HSCA admitted the following about the photographs:

- They are generally of rather poor photographic quality.

- Some of them were taken in such a manner that it is nearly impossible to anatomically orient the direction of view.

- In many of them, scaler references are entirely lacking, or, when present, are positioned in such a manner that it is difficult or impossible to obtain accurate measurements of critical features from anatomical landmarks.

- Not one of them contains information identifying the victim, such as his name, the autopsy case number, and the date and place of the examination.

7 HSCA 46
 
Robert Prey said:
Originally Posted by Robert Prey View Post
The autopsy x-rays and photos were never authenticated and specifically contrary to the observations of all the Parkland doctors and many others. Live with it.





* The HSCA admitted the following about the photographs:

- They are generally of rather poor photographic quality.

- Some of them were taken in such a manner that it is nearly impossible to anatomically orient the direction of view.

- In many of them, scaler references are entirely lacking, or, when present, are positioned in such a manner that it is difficult or impossible to obtain accurate measurements of critical features from anatomical landmarks.

- Not one of them contains information identifying the victim, such as his name, the autopsy case number, and the date and place of the examination.

7 HSCA 46
Click to expand...

The question of quality is unimportant.

The HSCA concluded the man inthe photograph was JFK. They authenticated the photos. Black and white and colour rolls.
573 1.The individual shown in tthe autopsy photographs is John F. Kennedy.
Click to expand...

If you think the details are poor does not matter, If they would be accepted in court does not matter. The fact is they were authenticated. As you must know if you read the HSCA appendicies. So why claim otherwise and cherrry pick the lines that suit you?
 
jargon buster said:
Lol..don't you know the answer to that yet? :)
Click to expand...



Now he knows we don't trust anything he says or posts so he KNOWS his lies and misrepresentations will be picked up, but then he is a troll and that is what trolls do.

Does anyone actually think Robert is here to have a meaningful discussion?

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert with your last post Jesus was so hurt by your sins he is considering having a homo erotic interlude with Satan....and its all YOUR fault, lol
 
Last edited:
Tomtomkent said:
The question of quality is unimportant.

The HSCA concluded the man inthe photograph was JFK. They authenticated the photos. Black and white and colour rolls.
Click to expand...

But I just proved that the HSCA stated they were not in any way authenticated. Moreover, the Report went on to state:

"In fact, under ordinary circumstances, the defense could raise some reasonable and perhaps sustainable objections to an attempt to introduce such poorly made and documented photographs as evidence in a murder trial. Furthermore, even the prosecution might have second thoughts about using certain of these photographs since they are more confusing than informative."

7 HSCA 46

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol7/html/HSCA_Vol7_0028b.htm

You say the very opposite of what the Report says. And Jay says it's all irrelevant, which goes to prove the adage, that a man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still. There is just no way to make a person remove his head from the sand or from the brainwash in his head, if he refuses to cooperate.
 
Does anyone actually think Robert is here to have a meaningful discussion?
Click to expand...
I dont think there is, yet some people actually keep responding to him with positive and well thought out posts.

And please stop saying its for the benefit of lurkers, that doest really wash anymore, not in reference to Robert.
 
There is just no way to make a person remove his head from the sand or from the brainwash in his head, if he refuses to cooperate.
Click to expand...

Go on guys, hes given you this on a plate so he can accuse you of ad hominem.
Go for it, its what he craves. ;)
 
jargon buster said:
Go on guys, hes given you this on a plate so he can accuse you of ad hominem.
Go for it, its what he craves. ;)
Click to expand...
Naaa, he gets enough attention as it is. We can't just give him everything he wants! I still don't have any yellow cards on my rap sheet, and I'd prefer to save the rant that will earn me my first flag for someone more deserving than Mr. Prey ;)
 
Robert Prey said:
You say the very opposite of what the Report says. And Jay says it's all irrelevant, which goes to prove the adage, that a man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still. There is just no way to make a person remove his head from the sand or from the brainwash in his head, if he refuses to cooperate.
Click to expand...

The very opposite to what the reports says?

Please, hilight where the text I quoted differs from that in the appendix of the HSA report.

It was a direct quote.

Regardless of other issues with the quality for trial the photographs were authenticated as being of John F Kennedy. The HSCA confirmed their content as authentic.

Jay is allowed his own opinion.

Please remove your head from the sand and concede the plain fact the photos were indeed authenticated. Your side issues do no alter this. Your opinion of them do not alter this. We have documentary evidence that has been provided by the photos were authenticated.

I don't give half a hoot where you want to move the goal posts too, what you now wish you mean, or who would or would not argue against their use in court. They were authenticated and you were wrong and remain wrong to claim otherwise.
 
573 1. The individual shown in the autopsy photographs is John F Kennedy.

Which part of that authentication did I misquote as an exact opposite Robert?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom