JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, and lest we forget any number of witnesses can be proven wrong by physical evidence. Except in Roberts pretend version of a theoretical court room. 40 witnesses claiming what they thought they remembered seeing remain trumped by photographic, autopsy, filmed and forensic evidence robert has failed to discredit to anybodies satisfaction but his own in 200 pages.
 
What is the explanation for all those people who ran towards the grassy knoll?
To catch the shooter of course, it makes sense that random people who had just seen the Presidents head blown off to run in the direction of the person with the gun to stop him.
Surely someone desperate enough to shoot a President would not have to bottle to shoot a random person trying to stop him. :rolleyes:
 
What is the explanation for all those people who ran towards the grassy knoll?

One of the biggest problems the British army had in Northern Ireland when under fire in urban areas was figuring out where the shots were coming from.

Reports from gunshots echo off buildings, streets, road signs etc. such that their apparent origin changes depending on your relative location.

The fact that some people thought the shots were coming from somewhere else is to be expected.
 
Oh, and lest we forget any number of witnesses can be proven wrong by physical evidence. Except in Roberts pretend version of a theoretical court room. 40 witnesses claiming what they thought they remembered seeing remain trumped by photographic, autopsy, filmed and forensic evidence

Not a scintilla of which shows a dime sized entry wound in the back of the head. Dishonesty is shameful.
 
Either quote the post in which you name more than 40 medical witnesses that have notbeen dismissed by due scrutiny to prove anybody other than you is baring false witness, or explain what relevance or authority god has on the issue.

God knows who is lying. Be not deceived. God is not mocked.
 
God knows who is lying.

Does he indeed? Should the chap exist no doubt he is fully aware of who is claiming to have more than 40 Medical Witnesses, how many witnesses have been produced, how few support your claims under due scrutiny, and who is not able to post a list of more than 40 names of medical professionals he wishes to alledge support his claims.

So do the rest of us.
 
Not a scintilla of which shows a dime sized entry wound in the back of the head. Dishonesty is shameful.

As has been discussed at length several of the available pieces of evidence (including those supplied by witnesses whose testimony you have tried to misrepresent to suit your chosen fantasy) do indeed support, and indeed prove, such an entry wound.

Might I reccomend you refamiliarise yourself with some of the posts in this thread that corrected you on what the medical testimony actually means, the autopsy photographs and the Z film, all of which support the findings of the WC?

Or is this another attempt of a fringe reset where you will once again try and pretend that a hole the size of a dime is not a "large" wound in terms of holes in a head? Where you can once again refuse to tell us what medical terminology should be used to describe the wounds in the WC because you will look no further than your favourite CT?

Once again: No fringe reset for you. This ground has been covered and you remain wring until you are able to actually produce any evidence.
 
'Thou shalt not bear false witness." -- God

God knows who is lying. Be not deceived. God is not mocked.

Do you really think Bible preaching is going to sway your long-time critics in a skeptics forum? I agree it's a little more dignified than trying to fend off your critics with lunchmeat, but telling us that God will punish us unless we believe your nonsense has got to be the lamest, most desperate act ever.
 
Do you really think Bible preaching is going to sway your long-time critics in a skeptics forum? I agree it's a little more dignified than trying to fend off your critics with lunchmeat, but telling us that God will punish us unless we believe your nonsense has got to be the lamest, most desperate act ever.

Gods opinion is pretty much off topic. If Robert wants I am sure he could open a thread in the Religion sector of the forum. I for one would be amused to know how Robert can know gods opinion on who is lying or not.
 
40 plus on the scene medical witnesses is nothing less than a slam dunk.
Especially when compared to zero on the scene medical witnesses who claim to have observed a dime size enty wound in the back of K's head.
No contest.


Either quote the post in which you name more than 40 medical witnesses that have notbeen dismissed by due scrutiny to prove anybody other than you is baring false witness, or explain what relevance or authority god has on the issue.

Yes, please do that, Robert Prey.
I've asked for this repeatedly to no avail, but hope springs eternal.
 
The Rydberg Drawing

Here then, is the entire basis for the Warren Commission's one lone nut from the back conclusion. Not allowed to actually see any autopsy photos, the entire Warren Report rests upon drawings by Medical Illustrator Harold Rydberg, based on nothing but the alleged recollections of autopsy doctors Humes and Boswell who were not even present when Rydberg made the drawings.

picture.php



But there isn't a single critic on this board who can name a single on the scene witness who can confirm the accuracy of this drawing as to the entrance wound in the head. Not Tomtom, not Jay Utah. No one. Thus, the score remains 40 medical witnesses to zero, plus several more non-medical witnesses to the shooting as well.
 
Last edited:
Here then, is the entire basis for the Warren Commission's one lone nut from the back conclusion. Not allowed to actually see any autopsy photos, the entire report rests upon drawings by Medical Illustrator Harold Rydberg.

<snip>

But there isn't a single critic on this board who can name a single on the scene witness who can confirm the accuracy of this drawing as to the entrance wound in the head:

So you're going to continue to run away from defending your 40-ish medical-ish witness-ish claim?
 
We have a hospital bed confession from E. Howard Hunt to his son St. John, that he was involved in "the Big Event" which involved a French gunman on the Grassy Knoll, and the operation was headed by JBJ.

There is also a book by Barr McClellan, who was an attorney for the firm that represented LBJ called "How LBJ Killed JFK".

What more do you need to be skepical of the official story?

Cool story guy.

Too bad the Hunt kid didn't get a better deal.
 
God knows who is lying. Be not deceived. God is not mocked.

Take it to the religion forum please. This has nothing to do with the topic of the thread. Anyway, your god will be miffed at you for telling porkies about JFK's assassination.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom