• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

$1M Controlled Demolition Challenge?

Clayton Moore said:
Do you have any math to support your lie?
Click to expand...
Don't have a lie, you have the lie. A big delusional claim not supported with math, physics and science. You have failed to make a point.

911 truth can't find the studies done. You spread fantasy, and claim the WTC can't collapse. 911 truth proved wrong on 911.

You will present no math, no paper to back your claim. What will you do with your failed claims? Nothing, you have no evidence. Please prove your claim with a model, computer model, a paper, some differential equations, or something more than silly claims.
 
Last edited:
Clayton Moore said:
That's the point. Nobody can do it since it never happened.
Click to expand...

The challenge was for anyone to show that the buildings could be collapsed in the same fashion as seen on 9/11 using the various truther contended methods. Certainly you can demonstrate that it could be done with explosives and still satify the conditions that existed on 9/11, right?
 
beachnut said:
Don't have a lie, you have the lie. A big delusional claim not supported with math, physics and science. You have failed to make a point.

911 truth can't find the studies done. You spread fantasy, and claim the WTC can't collapse. 911 truth proved wrong on 911.

You will present no math, no paper to back your claim. What will you do with your failed claims? Nothing, you have no evidence. Please prove your claim with a model, computer model, a paper, some differential equations, or something more than silly claims.
Click to expand...

They didn't collapse they were blown up. The entire world knows.


1x = top third of each tower.
2x = middle third of each tower.
3x = bottom third of each tower.

1x cannot demolish 2x.
Nor can 1x demolish 2x and 3x.

Create accurate as possible model of one of the towers.
Freeze the program.
Remove entire floors 71, 72, 73.
Restart the program.

Would floors 74-110 demolish floors 1-70?

No.
 
Clayton Moore said:
1x = top third of each tower.
2x = middle third of each tower.
3x = bottom third of each tower.

1x cannot demolish 2x.
Nor can 1x demolish 2x and 3x.

Create accurate as possible model of one of the towers.
Freeze the program.
Remove entire floors 71, 72, 73.
Restart the program.

Would floors 74-110 demolish floors 1-70?

No.
Click to expand...

Oh dear. Not even wrong.
 
Clayton Moore said:
They didn't collapse they were blown up. The entire world knows.


1x = top third of each tower.
2x = middle third of each tower.
3x = bottom third of each tower.

1x cannot demolish 2x.
Nor can 1x demolish 2x and 3x.

Create accurate as possible model of one of the towers.
Freeze the program.
Remove entire floors 71, 72, 73.
Restart the program.

Would floors 74-110 demolish floors 1-70?

No.
Click to expand...

Post from pure incredulity.

Removing floors isn't the same as having an airplane crash into the buildings, initiating fires, and cause the weakening of the steel. They are two extremely separate scenarios.

That being said, I do believe that even your model would cause the demolition of the rest of the towers.

Please provide something or anything to back this up. I know you are trying to get someone to create this program, but can you provide any numbers to back this up?
 
plague311 said:
Removing floors isn't the same as having an airplane crash into the buildings, initiating fires, and cause the weakening of the steel. They are two extremely separate scenarios.
Click to expand...

That never seems to occur to truthers.


Please provide something or anything to back this up. I know you are trying to get someone to create this program, but can you provide any numbers to back this up?
Click to expand...

Yes, Clayton, show us the physics of your claim. How would you judge if a computer model was accurate? What training have you had in this field?
 
Clayton Moore said:
They didn't collapse they were blown up. The entire world knows.


1x = top third of each tower.
2x = middle third of each tower.
3x = bottom third of each tower.

1x cannot demolish 2x.
Nor can 1x demolish 2x and 3x.

Create accurate as possible model of one of the towers.
Freeze the program.
Remove entire floors 71, 72, 73.
Restart the program.

Would floors 74-110 demolish floors 1-70?

No.
Click to expand...

This is groundbreaking work. You need to submit this rigorous analysis to an engineering journal right away. Gravitational collapse: Just say no!
 
Clayton Moore said:
They didn't collapse they were blown up. The entire world knows.


1x = top third of each tower.
2x = middle third of each tower.
3x = bottom third of each tower.

1x cannot demolish 2x.
Nor can 1x demolish 2x and 3x.

Create accurate as possible model of one of the towers.
Freeze the program.
Remove entire floors 71, 72, 73.
Restart the program.

Would floors 74-110 demolish floors 1-70?

No.
Click to expand...

They certainly demolished 73, then 74-110+73 demolished 72 and so on.
 
Clayton Moore said:
They didn't collapse they were blown up. The entire world knows.


1x = top third of each tower.
2x = middle third of each tower.
3x = bottom third of each tower.

1x cannot demolish 2x.
Nor can 1x demolish 2x and 3x.

Create accurate as possible model of one of the towers.
Freeze the program.
Remove entire floors 71, 72, 73.
Restart the program.

Would floors 74-110 demolish floors 1-70?

No.
Click to expand...
It is cool, you are serious, but you can't prove the towers were blown up. No thermite product found on the steel, no blast effects on the steel. You have no evidence for your fantasy lie.

911 truth math? Where is your model? I have the WTC towers, real full scale models. They collapsed due to fires after 10 terrorists took over two jets, not to hijack, but use as kinetic energy weapons - physics kind of thing. Like 911 truth, the terrorists had no clue the towers would fail under fire, but then, they can't do the math either.

You truther math has failed. When will you attempt a real model, with real math to show us all how the towers can't fall.

How much can single WTC tower floor hold before it fails - in pounds if you can do the math.
 
plague311 said:
Post from pure incredulity.

Removing floors isn't the same as having an airplane crash into the buildings, initiating fires, and cause the weakening of the steel. They are two extremely separate scenarios.

That being said, I do believe that even your model would cause the demolition of the rest of the towers.
Click to expand...

The above is why I am the Big "incredibly smart" Dog here by an incredibly wide margin.

Removing the three floors would a be much WORSE scenario than an airplane crash into the buildings, initiating fires, and causing the weakening of the steel.

Yet plague311 inferred the opposite.
 
Clayton Moore said:
The above is why I am the Big "incredibly smart" Dog here by an incredibly wide margin.

Removing the three floors would a be much WORSE scenario than an airplane crash into the buildings, initiating fires, and causing the weakening of the steel.

Yet plague311 inferred the opposite.
Click to expand...
You proved you are unable to present evidence to support your fantasy.
 
Last edited:
Clayton Moore said:
I am the Big "incredibly smart" Dog here by an incredibly wide margin.
Click to expand...

Indeed. You are, if anything, doubly incredible.

BTW, 74-110 wouldn't need to drop a distance of three stories to cause a collapse from 70 to the ground, if that's what you meant. More like 18".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom