JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
Robert Prey said:
"I haven't seen a single piece of evidence that would refute the Warren Commission's conclusion of Lee Harvey Oswald firing all of the shots from behind..." --

Gary Mack in the documentary 'Inside the Target Car."


No, Gary, you haven't since like the WC, you never bothered to even consider the large blow-out wound in the back of K's head observed by scores of on the scene witnesses indicating a fatal shot from the front.
Click to expand...

Again with the fantasy world?
 
E. Howard Hunt confession. Barr McClellan: How LBJ killed JFK

Tomtomkent said:
We only have evidence for Oswald. Any more, or different shooters are possible, but are not plausible with out evidence to support them. There is evidence that suggests the possibility, but little more in real terms.
Click to expand...
We have a hospital bed confession from E. Howard Hunt to his son St. John, that he was involved in "the Big Event" which involved a French gunman on the Grassy Knoll, and the operation was headed by JBJ.

There is also a book by Barr McClellan, who was an attorney for the firm that represented LBJ called "How LBJ Killed JFK".

What more do you need to be skepical of the official story?
 
Last edited:
Frishman said:
We have a hospital bed confession from E. Howard Hunt to his son St. John, that he was involved in "the Big Event" which involved a French gunman on the Grassy Knoll, and the operation was headed by JBJ.

There is also a book by Barr McClellan, who was an attorney for the firm that represented LBJ called "How LBJ Killed JFK".

What more do you need to be skepical of the official story?
Click to expand...
Evidence.
 
LSSBB said:
Evidence.
Click to expand...
No one should have to spoon feed you. Open your eyes and ears. You can start by listening to Hunt's confession and reading Barr's book. This forum is for skeptics and critical thinkers, and that takes work. Evidence is not going to get into your brain by osmosis. Don't be a lazy gullible Truster.
 
Last edited:
Frishman said:
No one should have to spoon feed you. Open your eyes and ears. You can start by listening to Hunt's confession and reading Barr's book. This forum is for skeptics and critical thinkers, and that takes work. Evidence is not going to get into your brain by osmosis. Don't be a lazy gullible Truster.
Click to expand...

I've done research, and followed the debate for years. I haven't seen any evidence, unless you have something new and groundbreaking.

Condescention ain't gonna win you any points.
 
Tomtomkent said:
Why would he bother to look at something that did not exhist and for which you have failed to provide any valid evidence?

No fringe reset for your unfounded fantasy.
Click to expand...

40 plus on the scene medical witnesses is nothing less than a slam dunk.
Especially when compared to zero on the scene medical witnesses who claim to have observed a dime size enty wound in the back of K's head.
No contest.
 
Robert Prey said:
40 plus on the scene medical witnesses is nothing less than a slam dunk.
Especially when compared to zero on the scene medical witnesses who claim to have observed a dime size enty wound in the back of K's head.
No contest.
Click to expand...


And still no plausible shots from anywhere except LHO's rifle. Why do you bother?
 
Frishman said:
No one should have to spoon feed you. Open your eyes and ears. You can start by listening to Hunt's confession and reading Barr's book. This forum is for skeptics and critical thinkers, and that takes work. Evidence is not going to get into your brain by osmosis. Don't be a lazy gullible Truster.
Click to expand...

You don't have evidence, you have nonsense. Are you hiding your evidence in Al Gore's lock box? Where is it?
 
Robert Prey said:
40 plus on the scene medical witnesses is nothing less than a slam dunk.
Especially when compared to zero on the scene medical witnesses who claim to have observed a dime size enty wound in the back of K's head.
No contest.
Click to expand...
No, you didn't have 40 medical witnesses months ago, and you still don't now. So no slam dunk for you.

We're still waiting for your narrative of what you believe happened that day in Dallas. Who did it, why they did it, who was behind it, and where they fired from. With evidence of course.

I know I won't be holding my breath waiting for you to finally reveal your full list of 40 medical witnesses, nor your comprehensive and fact based narrative.
 
Robert Prey said:
40 plus on the scene medical witnesses is nothing less than a slam dunk.
Click to expand...

But you have not produced 40 plus medical witnesses.

You have not produced ANY medical witnesses who have been shown to reliably support your claims. Every quote you have provided has been shown not to with stand scrutiny. You have NEVER named 40 MEDICAL witnesses. You even argued that your list of 40 plus WITNESSES was a different list as less than 30 were in a medical profession.

So how about you quit yammering about how something you have not and can not produce is a theoretical slam dunk.

Or name 40 medical witnesses who have not already been discounted.
 
Echo Chamber

"What is the explanation for all those people who ran towards the grassy knoll?"

Dealey Plaza is an echo chamber which resulted in some people looking up at the 6th floor of the Texas School Book Depository, while others thought the shots came from the grassy knoll. The testimony of those who heard shots coming from the TSBD and saw a man matching Oswald's description at the 6th floor window was validated by the mass of evidence demonstrating Oswald's guilt.
 
Tomtomkent said:
But you have not produced 40 plus medical witnesses.

You have not produced ANY medical witnesses who have been shown to reliably support your claims. Every quote you have provided has been shown not to with stand scrutiny. You have NEVER named 40 MEDICAL witnesses. You even argued that your list of 40 plus WITNESSES was a different list as less than 30 were in a medical profession.

So how about you quit yammering about how something you have not and can not produce is a theoretical slam dunk.

Or name 40 medical witnesses who have not already been discounted.
Click to expand...

'Thou shalt not bear false witness." -- God
 
Robert Prey said:
'Thou shalt not bear false witness." -- God
Click to expand...

Either quote the post in which you name more than 40 medical witnesses that have notbeen dismissed by due scrutiny to prove anybody other than you is baring false witness, or explain what relevance or authority god has on the issue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom