Atheism Plus/Free Thought Blogs (FTB)

Status
Not open for further replies.
In his latest video Thunderf00t makes the claim that the Internet is playing a significant role in furthering the goals of atheists. I offer the following: Mormon Church Admitting the Internet is Hurting Retention of members

also promotes lots of woo too. more new age and conspiracy than religion but still. seems loads round here are taking to nwo cts and new age spirituality, mixed with bad enviroment science.

all the hippy stuff is the future worry imo.

lxxx
 
Are you engaging in ad hominem? IOW: conservapedia is suspect therefore the proposition (my proposition) is false? The key here is the proposition. If you are challenging the proposition on the basis of the credibility of conservapedia I will find another but your logic is fallacious.
Conservapedia is not a source I would rely for anything, especially not an unbiased account of a sequence of events involving Richard Dawkins and other prominent atheists. I don't believe it is ad hominem to question its veracity. It is not something you can use to bolster your proposition.

Do you need me to find another source?
Not really. I'm fully aware of the sequence of events, and I think it's pushing it to claim that A+ was started by Rebecca, which was the original statement to which I responded. A+ was just as much a result of Boobquake, for which Jen McCreight was also responsible, which was a year before Elevatorgate.
 
Conservapedia is not a source I would rely for anything, especially not an unbiased account of a sequence of events involving Richard Dawkins and other prominent atheists. I don't believe it is ad hominem to question its veracity. It is not something you can use to bolster your proposition.
So if conservapedia says 1+1=2 then they are wrong? BTW: The source wasn't provided for "proof" of anything. It simply documented the events.

Not really. I'm fully aware of the sequence of events, and I think it's pushing it to claim that A+ was started by Rebecca, which was the original statement to which I responded. A+ was just as much a result of Boobquake, for which Jen McCreight was also responsible, which was a year before Elevatorgate.
In this video the nexus is made quite clear.

Please to provide a similar nexus for boobquake?
 
Last edited:
So if conservapedia says 1+1=2 then they are wrong? BTW: The source wasn't provided for "proof" of anything. It simply documented the events.
ETA: It does nothing of the sort.


In this video the nexus is made quite clear.
ETA: I haven't watched it, I rarely have the time or inclination to watch videos, especially (no idea if it's the case here) stream of consciousness rants. Has someone taken the time to write it down?

Please to provide a similar nexus for boobquake?

How about this?
 
Last edited:
Are you engaging in ad hominem? IOW: conservapedia is suspect therefore the proposition (my proposition) is false? The key here is the proposition. If you are challenging the proposition on the basis of the credibility of conservapedia I will find another but your logic is fallacious.

Do you need me to find another source?

Out of curiosity, how often do you use Conservapedia?
 
Out of curiosity, how often do you use Conservapedia?
Never have. I've no problem using it if the events documented are sourced. To simply dismiss any and everything from any source is intellectually lazy at best and downright dishonest at worst.
 
Never have. I've no problem using it if the events documented are sourced. To simply dismiss any and everything from any source is intellectually lazy at best and downright dishonest at worst.

Really? Would you quote The Onion as the source for anything?
 
ETA: I haven't watched it, I rarely have the time or inclination to watch videos, especially (no idea if it's the case here) stream of consciousness rants. Has someone taken the time to write it down?
Yeah, because you can waste hours with me arguing back and forth gainsaying but you can't take 7 minutes (length of video) out of your time to watch it.

Unlike you I wasn't too damn lazy to check your source. Okay, how about it? I don't see a nexus there. I see something that is at best tangential. Where as EG has a clear nexus.

Okay, now to prove my claim that you will give up your time to gain say but you won't watch the damn video. I'm estimating that it would take you between 1 - 2 minutes to for every post you respond with. That's 3 - 7 responses. Let's see if your time is so valuable that you give up before then.

Ball is in your court, go...
 
Never have. I've no problem using it if the events documented are sourced. To simply dismiss any and everything from any source is intellectually lazy at best and downright dishonest at worst.

It is possible to find a diamond in an outhouse but most prefer jewelry stores.
 
Really? Would you quote The Onion as the source for anything?
The onion doesn't claim to be a legitimate source of anything. So how about we get back to the topic. I realize that you would like to take the thread off topic but that's really poor form.
 
It is possible to find a diamond in an outhouse but most prefer jewelry stores.
Agreed. But if I find a diamond in an outhouse that won't make it worthless, right?

Now, can we get back on topic?

ETA:

RandFan said:
Do you need me to find another source?
I never insisted on the source. So this browbeating is a waste of everyone's time and again, it's OT, am I right?
 
Last edited:
Yeah, because you can waste hours with me arguing back and forth gainsaying but you can't take 7 minutes (length of video) out of your time to watch it.
I happen to be watching TV at the moment, as well as posting here.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/blaghag...-club-why-its-time-for-a-new-wave-of-atheism/Unlike you I wasn't too damn lazy to check your source. Okay, how about it? I don't see a nexus there. I see something that is at best tangential. Where as EG has a clear nexus.

I'm not sure what you mean by a nexus. However, it seems pretty clear to me that it was Boobquake that Jennifer herself cites as the event that led to A+.

Boobquake made me wake up. What I originally envisioned as an empowering event about supporting women’s freedoms and calling out dangerous superstitious thinking devolved into “Show us your tits!” I received sexual invitations from strangers around the country. When I appeared or spoke at atheist events, there was always a flood of comments about my chest and appearance. I’ve been repeatedly told I can never speak out against people objectifying or sexually harassing me because a joke about my boobs was eternal “consent.”
So I started speaking up about dirty issues like feminism and diversity and social justice because I thought messages like “please stop sexually harassing me” would be simple for skeptics and rationalists.
...

Okay, now to prove my claim that you will give up your time to gain say but you won't watch the damn video. I'm estimating that it would take you between 1 - 2 minutes to for every post you respond with. That's 3 - 7 responses. Let's see if your time is so valuable that you give up before then.

Ball is in your court, go...
Trying to guilt me into watching a video? Sorry, I really don't need to, since it's clear that Rebecca, and particularly Elevatorgate, are not the prime causes (clearly they are related, and I'm not denying that) of A+.
 
Trying to guilt me into watching a video?
I'm not trying to guilt you into anything. I'm trying to demonstrate that your claim of not wanting to watch the video because you don't have the time is silly. This is the 2nd post since I asked you to watch the video. That's 2 - 4 minutes.

Keep going.

I happen to be watching TV at the moment...
I never demanded that you watch it immediately. But nice job of moving the goal posts.

Still OT.
 
Last edited:
I'm not trying to guilt you into anything. I'm trying to demonstrate that your claim of not wanting to watch the video because you don't have the time is silly. This is the 2nd post since I asked you to watch the video. That's 2 - 4 minutes.

Keep going.

I never demanded that you watch it immediately. But nice job of moving the goal posts.

Still OT.

If the video is so short, then it should not be too difficult for you to precis the argument for the benefit of not just me, but everyone else reading the thread, now and in the future (when the video might no longer be available).
 
As I already said, I'm pretty familiar with that. What's the argument that it is responsible for A+, and Boobquake isn't? Just to make it plain, Boobquake took place in April 2010, and Jennifer McCreight spoke about it at TAM8 in July 2010. The elevator incident didn't happen until June 2011.
I disagree that boobquake had much of any cause and effect. But fine, let's make Boobquake a precursor.

But the video I posted makes a cause and effect argument that I think most honest people would find compelling.
 
If the video is so short, then it should not be too difficult for you to precis the argument for the benefit of not just me, but everyone else reading the thread, now and in the future (when the video might no longer be available).
I'll make you a deal. You watch the video and I'll take the time to transcribe the entire video. That will take me a lot longer than 7 minutes.

Fair?

3rd post 3 - 6 minutes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom