Which god myths do you find uncertainty about regarding the myth aspect?
What point are you even making here? Who cares about a debate over the supernatural being outside the realm of reality or whatever it is you are on about apologizing for faith based (i.e. evidence-less) beliefs.
That gobbledygook did not answer my very straight forward questions so I'll take this as you can neither define a god that isn't a myth nor do you know of any gods described by believers through history that there is any evidence are not myths.
I'm not sure what your position is here. Are you claiming there was some health benefit in the Jewish dietary restrictions? Because avoiding trichinosis was a pretty minor benefit consider all one needed was to ban undercooked pork. And, yes, the apology of some benefit bestowed by a god on its people has pretty much been debunked by the science 2,000 years later.
Who cares that someone pretends the 'single god' myth is superior to a 'multiple gods' myth? It doesn't make either belief less of a myth.
Sometimes people are tired of providing the evidence (or, more often, pointing out the lack of evidence) the tenth time someone arrives and makes a claim that's been comprehensively dealt with many times before.
Can you give an example? That doesn't sound like this place at all; I've certainly never been 'controlled' as far as I can recall. More likely, on any particular topic one or two people have specific knowledge or an interest, and tend to be the ones following most closely and posting replies first. If they're covering the main points, there's not much left for others to do except to agree.
