trustbutverify
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 5, 2007
- Messages
- 10,544
you have tried to make this nonsense claim before.
it is a totally subjective opinion.
nothing more.
Because Jref is no place to express subjective opinions.
you have tried to make this nonsense claim before.
it is a totally subjective opinion.
nothing more.
Took barely 40 minutes for Palestinians to break the cease fire and fire more rockets.
NO NO NO! You have it all wrong!
[qimg]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/24320839/Jref/ceasefire.jpg[/qimg]
Jebus, that's a dumb headline. Is it real? Looks kinda iffy.
Jebus, that's a dumb headline. Is it real? Looks kinda iffy.
It's real and its taken from an article from July 25, 1981. Sadly, just as appropriate today as it was then.

I sure hope the guy that put that together got sacked. It does show a certain bias quite clearly, though.
It's also a totally subjective opinion that genocide is bad. The very notion of bad is subjective.
I'm fine with such subjectivity. You are too, if you're honest with yourself, unless it gets in the way of your play attempts at moral relativism.
I'm not sure I understand the objection.
I sure hope the guy that put that together got sacked. It does show a certain bias quite clearly, though.
No, it's not as simple as that. Such an analysis pretends that the past doesn't exist.
Hamas, a useful enemy to Israel and the US, is just the latest manifestation of Palestinian resistance to Israel's Zionist genocide, which has been going on for decades. The two "sides" have never been equal.
Because Jref is no place to express subjective opinions.
No, it's not as simple as that. Such an analysis pretends that the past doesn't exist.
Hamas, a useful enemy to Israel and the US, is just the latest manifestation of Palestinian resistance to Israel's Zionist genocide, which has been going on for decades. The two "sides" have never been equal.
Look at ww2, where the Nazi Party was utterly broken by the allies, yet we haven't had a more extreme version of the nazis emerge raring for Round 3.
How is genocide a matter of moral relativity? Most societies throughout human history agree that killing is wrong, and even more so that mass killing is wrong. It is clear that some societies choose to be subjective in their application of this moral principle, but the immorality of killing an entire segment of the human species has never been seen as something which is subjective. Unfortunately, the attention given to the said subject is subjective within most societies.
The very notion of bad is subjective..
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/2638950ad5937ba3d5.jpg[/qimg]
I'm not sure I understand the objection.
history, man...history.
By this logic, the United States went to war with Japan unprovoked.On the chance that you are: A "truce" normally implies that folks have stopped shooting at each other. However, when the Palestinians resumed rocket attacks, instead of saying "Palestinians break truce" the headline instead implies that the truce will only be broken when Israel fires back (bad Israelis - breaking truces!!).