• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged The election was stolen/rigged!

Obviously you understood the question, why can't you answer it?


Newt gingrich...what an ass.

careful Newt is lining up to be the first POTM (President of the Moon):D
Not that I oppose a lunar base but to complain about the country's debt and then call for spending billions for a base.......
h-y-p-o-c-r-i-t-e

He was an *** in the 80's and cemented the fact this past year. He had competition mind you. Rick Santorum and Herman Cain proved to not only be said posterior appendages but to also manage to breath while having their heads in that warm, moist, and odorous place.

One laugh riot to me was Gingrich opining on the sanctity of marriage.
 
You can, no doubt, give us a citation where Obama admitted this.

The Anointed One Trained at Alinsky's Industrial Areas Foundation, Obama taught workshops on the Alinsky method. In 1985 he began a four-year stint as a community organizer in Chicago, working for an Alinskyite group called the Developing Communities Project. Later, he worked with the infamous ACORN and its offshoot Project Vote , creations of the Alinsky network.
 
In which case, wasn't the assasination of JFK a good thing then? One less evil, lying, stealing cheater to deal with.

JFK was good and bad. His sexual indiscretions notwithstanding, he nearly got us into a nuclear war, but his ideas on taxes were sound. The aftermath of his assassination is an important reminder as to how easily it is to brainwash the public via a compliant news media -- a situation that is far worse today (Obamaworship) than it was then.
 
There's also freedom to ignore shrill harpies.
Its in the CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS :D
Generally, Robert, Canadians laugh at people like you, Bachman, and Coulter.

Most of the world does too. Sucks to be you.

/QUOTE]

Same to you.
 
I don't think so, Robert. They just aren't interested in listening to the screeching harpie.

Freedom is great, Robert. The ability to go where you want, and do what you want to do.

Can you go to Cuba?


No need to. We now have Obamacare. Congratulations, suckers.
 
Still seems that no-one has stepped forward to say that they voted Romney in these districts.

I'd call the matter closed.
 
Voter Fraud Reports Pouring In

Signs That Voter Fraud Is Wildly Out Of Control And The Election Was A Sham

"These problems first emerged in a number of swing states during early voting. In many of the most important swing states it was being reported that Romney voters were claiming that when they tried to cast votes for Romney that the voting machines changed their votes to Obama instead. The following is one example of this from Ohio…"

'I don’t know if it happened to anybody else or not, but this is the first time in all the years that we voted that this has ever happened to me,' said Marion, Ohio, voter Joan Stevens.
Stevens said that when she voted, it took her three tries before the machine accepted her choice to vote for Romney.
...

Edited by LashL: 
Snipped for compliance with Rule 4. Do not copy and paste lengthy tracts of text available elsewhere. Instead, quote a short passage with a link to the source.


http://marketdailynews.com/2012/11/...ng-mitt-romney-votes-into-barack-obama-votes/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Signs That Voter Fraud Is Wildly Out Of Control And The Election Was A Sham

"These problems first emerged in a number of swing states during early voting. In many of the most important swing states it was being reported that Romney voters were claiming that when they tried to cast votes for Romney that the voting machines changed their votes to Obama instead. The following is one example of this from Ohio…"

'I don’t know if it happened to anybody else or not, but this is the first time in all the years that we voted that this has ever happened to me,' said Marion, Ohio, voter Joan Stevens.
Stevens said that when she voted, it took her three tries before the machine accepted her choice to vote for Romney.
...

http://marketdailynews.com/2012/11/...ng-mitt-romney-votes-into-barack-obama-votes/

So just rinse, lather, repeat then? All you've done is retread the same fact free claims you made at the start. You really need to understand RP that repetition is not a substitute for evidence.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Signs That Voter Fraud Is Wildly Out Of Control And The Election Was A Sham

"These problems first emerged in a number of swing states during early voting. In many of the most important swing states it was being reported that Romney voters were claiming that when they tried to cast votes for Romney that the voting machines changed their votes to Obama instead. The following is one example of this from Ohio…"

'I don’t know if it happened to anybody else or not, but this is the first time in all the years that we voted that this has ever happened to me,' said Marion, Ohio, voter Joan Stevens.
Stevens said that when she voted, it took her three tries before the machine accepted her choice to vote for Romney.

...

http://marketdailynews.com/2012/11/...ng-mitt-romney-votes-into-barack-obama-votes/

Baloney.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"These problems..."

Malfunctioning voting machines. Asked and answered. You cherry-pick only those that malfunctioned in favor of Obama.

"Over in Pennsylvania..."

Ashcroft again. Asked and answered. Ashcroft is no credible, for the reasons already given.

"According to the head of the Republican Party of Maine..."

...who is widely considered a crackpot even by his own party. No one else remembers seeing these alleged hordes of "black people," nor can the claimant provide any evidence for bussed-in voters.
 
“Everybody has a right to vote, but nobody in town knows anyone who’s black,” Webster said.

Looks like he suddenly remembered that he knew black people.

“There’s nothing about me that would be discriminatory,” he said. “I know black people. I play basketball every Sunday with a black guy. He’s a great friend of mine. Nobody would ever accuse me of suggesting anything.”

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83967.html#ixzz2CUv6Iymp

Yes, Robert. Fleets of buses full of black people from the secret black people repository.

Voting machines switching to Romney or Obama, depending on your political flavour.

Obama has won. End of.
 
Yes, Robert. Fleets of buses full of black people from the secret black people repository.

That's the kind of story that make Maine Republicans do a collective facepalm every time time Webster opens his mouth, and probably why he won't survive much longer as that state's party chairman.

The problem with these conspiracy theories is that in order to include all the required elements (voter fraud, white supremacy) the plot has to be pretty silly. Here's what went on in the back room, according to Webster.

Tom: Okay, so we're going to flood the Maine electoral districts with a huge number of undocumented voters favorable to our candidate.
Dick: Won't the local precinct workers get suspicious when a huge number of undocumented voters arriving at the same time?
Tom: No, because if one person can bluff his way past the Maine poll workers, then fifty people should be fifty times more likely to do that.
Harry: And just to make sure they pass unnoticed among the population, let's be sure they're all a different color than everyone else in Maine.
Tom: Oh, good thinking!

I know know what's sillier: Webster's claims, or Robert's suggestion that we should believe them.
 
Signs That Voter Fraud Is Wildly Out Of Control And The Election Was A Sham

"These problems first emerged in a number of swing states during early voting. In many of the most important swing states it was being reported that Romney voters were claiming that when they tried to cast votes for Romney that the voting machines changed their votes to Obama instead. The following is one example of this from Ohio…"

'I don’t know if it happened to anybody else or not, but this is the first time in all the years that we voted that this has ever happened to me,' said Marion, Ohio, voter Joan Stevens.
Stevens said that when she voted, it took her three tries before the machine accepted her choice to vote for Romney.

...

Looks like problems with touch screen calibration, not voter fraud. How sad for you to not know the difference. The simpl fact that it was easily discovered shows it would not be effective for fraud.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There's also freedom to ignore shrill harpies.
Its in the CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS :D
Generally, Robert, Canadians laugh at people like you, Bachman, and Coulter.

Most of the world does too. Sucks to be you.

/QUOTE]

Same to you.

Nice "come-back".

You seem to miss the point....people are not laughing at jaydeehess, but there are laughing AT YOU.
 
QUOTE=jaydeehess;8776487]There's also freedom to ignore shrill harpies.
Its in the CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS :D
Generally, Robert, Canadians laugh at people like you, Bachman, and Coulter.

Most of the world does too. Sucks to be you.

/QUOTE]

Same to you.

Might have had more oomph if you had used the quote function properly, not to mention that according to your take on world events it does not suck to be me. After all the world is apparently going down the political tracks that I prefer, as opposed to yours, my country has not been as affected by the world financial crisis as yours, I applaud and enjoy the benefits of Canada's universal medical care, I don't mind paying the taxes I pay, Canada still uses paper ballots and thus NEVER has the problems of mis-calibrated voting machines that your country adopted, in Canada the religious bent of any candidate for any office is of practically no interest to the voting public, and I do not see eeeveel plots taking place on every street corner.

Nope doesn't suck to be me.
 
Last edited:
Looks like problems with touch screen calibration, not voter fraud. How sad for you to not know the difference. The simpl fact that it was easily discovered shows it would not be effective for fraud.

That and other glaring problems with that article have been pointed out to Robert who it seems, cannot fathom the responses he has gotten to it.

Word salad techno-babble is a definitive indication that the person being quoted has no idea what they are talking about. Not that this would stop Robert from believeing in it.
 
Apparently Webster and Robert have never filled out an on-line poll. There are no 'default' answers to posed questions and if one fails to make a selection that becomes obvious as one gets the reminder that one must choose/make a selection when you try to submit it.

At work, for our health benefits insurance (private, not gov't, not everything is covered by the gov't) we filled out a health questionaire and if you skipped a question it would indeed ask you to please answer question number x
For instance when I missed the selection which would indicate that I have or have not ever been diagnosed with a heart condition it did not 'default' to 'yes' or 'no'.

In some cases a default can be used though. For instance in our local Bass fishing tournament the 'default' ranking of the teams is by team number after which they are ranked by weight of catch. Obviously team #1 is in deafult first place as the boats leave the dock but there are only one way that this team could 'win' without catching more weight in fish than the other teams. That being the case in which no one catchs ANY fish.

That however is a contest whereas a vote is actually a poll with a binary answer and its not a recorded vote (the name of the person is not attached to the data created when they vote) therefore no default need be ascribed. Instead when a new vote is made that data is simply added to the database. A "default" as described in the above article by a person who's words prove him to be ignorant in such matters, is ridiculous.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom