• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Honor killing in Pakistan

'Allowed'?! That IS their culture. You make it sound like it was a conscious decision on the part of all males to become sexists a few years ago.

Rewind our culture 1000 years; were we being deliberately sexist in our treatment of women or was it just the cultural norm? Are you seriously suggesting that every male was deliberately sexist?

No one is saying you're incorrect in much what you type; the wiggle is what to do to bring about change, since a number of us have witnessed change in less time than might be imagined.
 
There's your quote from the perspective of a culture that believes killing a female child is the only way to maintain family honour.

I merely used the Chinese as an example of a large, powerful nation that wouldn't have too much trouble 'policing the world' if they wanted to. The question I'm raising is not why they would do it, but what if they DID do it - what would give them the right to do so?

That is a fail as female nudity is not on the same level as killing them in the name of a misplaced honour.

If you are such the expert, why do they not kill the rapists sibling, the one who really has shamed the family by being a incestuous rapist?
 
When I started in police work back in the late 60s, working predominantly in a lower-middle-class neighborhood full of industrial workers, domestic assaults and abuse were very, very common.
The scenario was so similar as to be almost comical; Friday night hubby would take his paycheck to the bar, get snortin' drunk, then come home and the inevitable fight with the wife would end up with the house torn up and the lady of the house at least beaten up and sometimes hospitalized.
This was so common that during a trip to the local supermarket on Monday you'd see a large percentage of the checkout ladies sporting fresh makeup to cover black eyes and bruises.
It was unusual to go a weekend without a report, and the vast majority of these incidents are not reported.
The women never prosecuted. Not during the 10 years I was on that department. Not one. I had women who were hospitalized, who suffered detached retinas, broken jaws, teeth knocked out....
We had a mandatory three-day "cooling off" period back then before warrants could be applied for.
You'd call the woman on the third day.... They were no longer interested in prosecution. Hubby was the only support for the family. He'd apologized. He'd bought gifts. He'd promised not to do it again....
All those tired old things you see them putting into the plot-lines of SVU....All dead-on true.
Homicides were not uncommon.

Then, in the late 70s, the domestic-abuse laws were (finally) changed. Now, if there is even the slightest evidence of an assault, the husband is arrested. And it's a serious charge; not a "common assault" such as used to be the case.
There are ongoing consequences.
As a result, the level of domestic violence has considerably dropped off, and though it's still a problem, it seems to us in police work that this notion that it's unacceptable behavior is becoming common knowledge in the communities.
One can only hope....
I can't speak as to how deeply this sort of behavior is part and parcel of human nature and a by-product of the way domestic situations are structured and societal pressures and all that...
I have read enough to know that spousal abuse, spousal murder, psychological abuses, and all those related things are common all over the world.
I listened to an NPR segment on the problem in Japanese society... Apparently very bad, with the women up until recent times virtually powerless.
Likewise in various Latin countries; Brazil being singled out in several articles with an extremely high homicide rate and until recently almost no prosecution for homicides committed "in the heat of passion".
There may be human societies free of this; I don't know.
The anthropologist Marvin Harris speculated that domestic abuse started once we moved into discrete housing; where things could be done behind closed doors rather than in front of the whole tribe....
 
Last edited:
Actually working for me, with me, and around me are:

Three Iraqis (one muslim, 2 assyrian)

2 Pakistani muslims

2 Indian hindis

1 Indian muslim

Syrian assyrian

A number of catholic Mexicans

3 pentecostal Mexicans.

I've worked with, for and around a number of different Middle-Eastern (and beyond) cultures for nearly 40 years; my MIL worked and lived in Kuwait and Saudi for a number of years and I'm friends with her friends as it were.

I am sadly only bi-lingual in Spanish.

Resume's resume so to speak.

You may now continue with your regularly scheduled imagined superiority.

Imagined superiority? You're the one suggesting that all people of a certain culture are sexists by choice, and that they should adhere to your values.

Let's just say that in the last 4 years I have spent nearly 2 in Afghanistan, and leave it there.

I speak a tiny amount of Pashto, but have always spoken to the Afghan males through an interpreter, as these people do not speak a single word of English. They are so far removed from what we would consider society, they would not even recognise a can of coke. These are some of the most hospitable people I have met, and they would go hungry in order to feed me and my group to ensure their reputation.

These same people who have absolutely no ill-will towards Westerners, opened fire on an American patrol. Luckily, nobody was killed, and an extremely tense situation was avoided. Why did these people open fire on the Americans? Because one of the soldiers copped a mouthful of dust and turned his head and spat. Just as they were passing the village mosque. He didn't spit ON it, he accidentally spat in that direction. Honour demanded that he be killed for that insult. It was certainly nothing personal, and nothing to do with race, etc. That is simply their way of life.

The same person who would leave himself hungry to feed me, as a matter of honour, pride and reputation treated his wife like a servant. Are you, Mr "I'm Absolutely Qualified To Judge An Entire Culture Based on Meeting Some Immigrants, and Knowing a Friend of a Friend Who Once Spent a Year in the Middle East" seriously going to tell me this man - and many, many like him - was deliberately being sexist for kicks, and it was nothing to do with the culture he was raised in?
 
Imagined superiority? You're the one suggesting that all people of a certain culture are sexists by choice, and that they should adhere to your values.

Let's just say that in the last 4 years I have spent nearly 2 in Afghanistan, and leave it there.

I speak a tiny amount of Pashto, but have always spoken to the Afghan males through an interpreter, as these people do not speak a single word of English. They are so far removed from what we would consider society, they would not even recognise a can of coke. These are some of the most hospitable people I have met, and they would go hungry in order to feed me and my group to ensure their reputation.

These same people who have absolutely no ill-will towards Westerners, opened fire on an American patrol. Luckily, nobody was killed, and an extremely tense situation was avoided. Why did these people open fire on the Americans? Because one of the soldiers copped a mouthful of dust and turned his head and spat. Just as they were passing the village mosque. He didn't spit ON it, he accidentally spat in that direction. Honour demanded that he be killed for that insult. It was certainly nothing personal, and nothing to do with race, etc. That is simply their way of life.

The same person who would leave himself hungry to feed me, as a matter of honour, pride and reputation treated his wife like a servant. Are you, Mr "I'm Absolutely Qualified To Judge An Entire Culture Based on Meeting Some Immigrants, and Knowing a Friend of a Friend Who Once Spent a Year in the Middle East" seriously going to tell me this man - and many, many like him - was deliberately being sexist for kicks, and it was nothing to do with the culture he was raised in?

Who said for kicks? But it is indeed by choice because I've witnessed that choice changing.

It seems to me that perhaps you're more interested in being right on the internet than much of anything else.

But again, I'm biased in favor of not honor murdering.

I'll leave it to Mr. Right on the Internet to correct any gross errors I may have typed.
 
That is a fail as female nudity is not on the same level as killing them in the name of a misplaced honour.

Oh god, you really don't get it do you?! Of course it isn't to US! How do you think one of these guys would react if his daughter walked down the main village street in a bikini?!

If you are such the expert, why do they not kill the rapists sibling, the one who really has shamed the family by being a incestuous rapist?

You. Have. Got. To. Be. Kidding. Me.

Because it's not his fault! The daughter was probably leading him on, but that's by the by. She has to die, because she is no longer pure; no man will touch her, and is therefore a HUGE source of shame and dishonour! His culture demands she be killed!
 
Who said for kicks? But it is indeed by choice because I've witnessed that choice changing.

It seems to me that perhaps you're more interested in being right on the internet than much of anything else.

But again, I'm biased in favor of not honor murdering.

I'll leave it to Mr. Right on the Internet to correct any gross errors I may have typed.

I am also against Honour Killing.

Ah, so it's Ad Homs and a bit of poisoning the well instead of addressing any of the points I made? Suit yourself.
 
Oh god, you really don't get it do you?! Of course it isn't to US! How do you think one of these guys would react if his daughter walked down the main village street in a bikini?!



You. Have. Got. To. Be. Kidding. Me.

Because it's not his fault! The daughter was probably leading him on, but that's by the by. She has to die, because she is no longer pure; no man will touch her, and is therefore a HUGE source of shame and dishonour! His culture demands she be killed!

Yeh, right :rolleyes:

I don't care that you were given a free lunch and so you now defend their culture as if you are the only one who really understands it.
 
I am also against Honour Killing.

Ah, so it's Ad Homs and a bit of poisoning the well instead of addressing any of the points I made? Suit yourself.

I agree with some of your points.

I don't agree when you stomp your feet and insist I agree because you know all sides of the equation, because you don't.
 
Yeh, right :rolleyes:

I don't care that you were given a free lunch and so you now defend their culture as if you are the only one who really understands it.

Oh dear god... You cannot be serious. I have had free lunches in Kosovo, Bosnia and Afghanistan, for varying reasons. The point - which you simply cannot see - is not that I ate free, but the emphasis these people place on honour and reputation.

I despair that I had to even explain that.
 
I agree with some of your points.

I don't agree when you stomp your feet and insist I agree because you know all sides of the equation, because you don't.

I wasn't stomping my feet. I'm pointing out to you that in my experience actually among these type of cultures, there is no such thing as 'sexism' by choice. It is absolutely culturally second nature.

I'm not about to get into a pissing contest over it.
 
Not the greatest source, this is an issue world wide, but it stems mainly from the Middle East

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honor_killing#South_Asia

Honor killings are directed mostly against women and girls and are most prevalent in Middle Eastern and South Asian Islamic cultures.

It really is about power and honour

"A complicated issue that cuts deep into the history of Arab society. .. What the men of the family, clan, or tribe seek control of in a patrilineal society is reproductive power. Women for the tribe were considered a factory for making men. The honour killing is not a means to control sexual power or behavior. What's behind it is the issue of fertility, or reproductive power."

"The right to life of women in Pakistan is conditional on their obeying social norms and traditions."

"... the predominantly Kurdish area of Turkey, has so far shown that little if any social stigma is attached to honor killing. It also comments that the practice is not related to a feudal societal structure, "there are also perpetrators who are well-educated university graduates. Of all those surveyed, 60 percent are either high school or university graduates or at the very least, literate."

It is purely about the culture system and honour and there appears to be no economic or religious belief reason behind it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Izzat_(honor)

"Izzat (Hindi-Urdu Farsi: इज़्ज़त or عزت) refers to the concept of honor prevalent in the culture of North India and Pakistan.[1] It applies universally across religions (Hindu, Muslim and Sikh), communities and genders.[2][3][4] Maintaining the reputation of oneself and one's family (especially women) is part of the concept of izzat, as is the obligatory taking of revenge when one's izzat has been violated."

Oh dear god... You cannot be serious. I have had free lunches in Kosovo, Bosnia and Afghanistan, for varying reasons. The point - which you simply cannot see - is not that I ate free, but the emphasis these people place on honour and reputation.

I despair that I had to even explain that.

I despair that you have not read the research into the topic I did at the very start of this thread. I understand izzat and I have enjoyed middle eastern people's great hospitality. I have also cringed at the way the women are sometimes treated by the men.

I despair that you are presently arguing from a point where you think you are the only one who gets this.
 
Well when you write-off an entire culture incorrectly based on limited experience, in order to prove your point, you didn't leave me much of a choice.

Again, your opinion is yours.

Have a good time thinking you're right on the internet.

ETA:

Just a wiggle about "writing off an entire culture," because frankly the comment pisses me off; I'm commenting on observations I've made. You have no frikken clue about the cultures I associate with, break bread with, drink with; how *********** dare you assume anything based on an internet conversation in which you claim a correspondent is lacking understanding. I understand quite a bit, and I experience quite a bit and my Iraqi, Pakistani, Mexican and other friends and coworkers are fine fellows, with some odd quirks and a few rather noxious beliefs.

I would imagine they think the same about me.
 
Last edited:
I despair that you have not read the research into the topic I did at the very start of this thread. I understand izzat and I have enjoyed middle eastern people's great hospitality. I have also cringed at the way the women are sometimes treated by the men.

I despair that you are presently arguing from a point where you think you are the only one who gets this.

Then going by your replies above I can only conclude that you're exercising an ill-judged sense of humour; trolling; or back-pedalling.
 
Well when you write-off an entire culture incorrectly based on limited experience, in order to prove your point, you didn't leave me much of a choice.

That is an interesting point.

If we right off the honour killings, domestic violence, lack of education for women and inequality between the sexes, are we righting off the whole culture?
 

Back
Top Bottom