Would you shoot a Big Foot?

I agree ~ WP ~ Part of my deal with the BF thing over on the old forum was being too nice, i didn't want to argue cause at the time i seen that was not working at all, and fighting does no good on and internet forum. So i listened very carefully but suspiciously to those that had reported seeing this thing. I guess it's just like real life huh ! if you hang with people that do certain things you to will start doing the same.


Tim
 
William Parcher said:
There should be no expectation of honesty in the world of Bigfoot.

If I hung around Bigfoot believers I would almost certainly start to lie myself.

"Yes, I believe you saw something." (A total lie)
"Yes, I think you are being honest." (A total lie)
"Yes, I think you should look into this further." (A total lie)
"Yes, there are rational reasons to think that Bigfoot is out there." (A total lie)

I could see myself saying these things to a Bigfoot believer under certain circumstances. Certain circumstances.
Click to expand...

Agreed. And that's why there is no need to get all excited about shooting someone in a suit @ Area X. The whole thing is a total lie.
 
I would definitely shoot a Bigfoot were I to see one while carrying a gun (two situations that are both extremely unlikely). But I'd only shoot off a tiny piece the Bigfoot didn't need to survive, so I could bring it down to some lab and have the DNA tested. I'd aim for the derriere, seeing as based on photographic evidence no Bigfoot sports one that appears (ahem) "functional" in any real-world digestive capacity.
 
clayflingythingy said:
The whole thing is a total lie.
Click to expand...

Called the "big lie" (a lie that would be so huge and obvious that the teller would never tell it because it would never work as a lie) and coming from beloved and trusted people. These people wouldn't lie. Look at them and their backgrounds. Some are devout Christians. Bipto spent many years pondering and wracking his brain over the question of Bigfoot. Do you think that guy is going to throw everything away by knowingly telling a big lie? Of course not, and that is why we all know that Bigfoot must really be at Area X. It must be true. All those people can't be liars together.

At least one of them would have broken from the group and publicly announced that it's a big lie. Right? Right?

What are the odds of nobody in TBRC wanting to remove themselves from the stench of lies? See, there's another case where the odds are in favor of Bigfoot.

You can't have thousands of people seeing Bigfoot over many decades without at least one being real. And you can't have a group of folks working Area X without at least one of them confessing that a lie is in progress.
 
Since various governmental agencies have done things as looney as setting aside monies to prepare for UFO visitations....Has no one petitioned the government to have Bigfoot placed on the endangered species list?
I mean, there must be fewer of them than bald eagles, and if you shoot an eagle you get in a whole heap o' trouble.....
 
One of the best indications that the TBRC doesn't believe their own Bigfoot habituation tall tale is that they have not involved the government and prominent scientists to properly document this new species.

By not involving real people* they let us all know that this is nothing more than more of the same from Bigfootery.


* You know what I mean. People who aren't already Bigfooters.
 
More than once I've challenged 'footers to do just what you suggest, Bikewer. That's actually how things get done. The USFWS is more often than not forced into action on the ESA when they've been sued by advocacy groups like the Sierra Club. I've explained that you can't on the one hand castigate an agency like the USFWS for not "promoting bigfoot conservation" and on the other never let them know that you feel that way.

There's a very good reason that no state or federal agency is considering conservation legislation aimed at bigfoot: no one is asking them to.

If I was a "knower" - one of those folks 100% convinced in the reality of bigfoots - and I was convinced that bigfoots truly need our protection, I'd be badgering my elected officials to do something about it.

(Elton John/Bernie Taupin tip o' the hat: "If I was a knower, huh, but then again, sculpt.")
 
The Shrike said:
More than once I've challenged 'footers to do just what you suggest, Bikewer. That's actually how things get done. The USFWS is more often than not forced into action on the ESA when they've been sued by advocacy groups like the Sierra Club. I've explained that you can't on the one hand castigate an agency like the USFWS for not "promoting bigfoot conservation" and on the other never let them know that you feel that way.

There's a very good reason that no state or federal agency is considering conservation legislation aimed at bigfoot: no one is asking them to.

If I was a "knower" - one of those folks 100% convinced in the reality of bigfoots - and I was convinced that bigfoots truly need our protection, I'd be badgering my elected officials to do something about it.

(Elton John/Bernie Taupin tip o' the hat: "If I was a knower, huh, but then again, sculpt.")
Click to expand...

So you would use, let's say, $61000, to lobby regulators and lawmakers. But would that get us any boobage?*

*boobage: exposed female mammary glands; a must-have feature of films designed to sell to the 18-55 year old, mouth-breathing demographic.
 
Last edited:
The question of the day is: Would it buy you any side-boobage? Patty is sporting side-boobage, but I have not seen a test proposed to emulate this.
 
Bipto, can you tell us more about these booms your group has heard and how you have investigated them ?
Thanks
 
Drewbot said:
The question of the day is: Would it buy you any side-boobage? Patty is sporting side-boobage, but I have not seen a test proposed to emulate this.
Click to expand...

You would have to ask CBengalensis about that. You can prolly reach him at the BFF.
As an aside, how would it feel if you were bob heironimus and knew that bleevers had been lusting after you for forty years...that's probably what made him go public!!
 
This could be a Vortex Zone.The booms are part of the vortex and Bigfoot is too. Have you noticed that there are no Bigfoot habituation sites just outside of Urea X? The Bigfoot action is right inside the area. This strongly suggests paranormal activity right there inside the vortex.

Pay particular attention to the fact that nobody has proven a lack of paranormal activity at Urea X. No proof of that.
 
We can put a man on the moon but they cannot prove that those booms aren't related to Bigfoot.
 
Not unless I was shooting with a camera. I don't touch firearms because I am not trained or licensed in their use, but even I were I still wouldn't shoot a Bigfoot with a gun since Bigfoot doesn't exist so it's either a bear or some idiot in a suit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom